Growth Impairment Caused by Raw Linseed Consumption: Can Trypsin Inhibitors Be Harmful for Health?
- 161 Downloads
Linseed (Linun usitatissimum L.) is an important oilseed whose nutritional value can be impaired due to presence of antinutritional factors and low protein digestibility. Protein fractions from raw linseed meal were extracted, isolated and analyzed in vitro and in vivo. Globulins, the major protein fraction of linseed, showed low in vitro susceptibility to trypsin and chymotrypsin, but its in vivo digestibility was 93.2 %. Albumin fraction had high trypsin inhibition activity (5250 Inhibition Units g−1) and presented low molecular mass protein bands, similar to known trypsin inhibitors. Raw linseed consumption caused negative effects on rat growth and reduction of intestinal villi. Results indicate that raw linseed meal must not be used as an exclusive source of protein regardless of the major proteins have high digestibility; digestive enzymes inhibitors in raw linseed probably reduces the protein utilization.
KeywordsLinseed Trypsin inhibitors Globulins Albumins Antinutritional factors Protein digestibility
Group I – casein group
Group II – raw linseed group
Human salivary amylase
Net protein ratio
Protein efficiency ratio
Sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
Our sincere acknowledgements to Maurício Pereira de Sales, a great researcher and professor (in memoriam). The authors also gratefully acknowledge Ana Heloneida A. Morais and Adriana F. Uchôa for fruitful discussions and generous help. This work was supported by the Brazilian agencies FINEP, CNPq, CAPES and BNB-FUNDECI.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
- 1.Bhatty RS (1995) Nutrient composition of whole linseed and linseed meal. In: Cunnane SC, Thompson LU (eds) Linseed in human nutrition. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
- 5.Shewry PR (1995) Plant storage proteins. Biol Rev 70:375–426Google Scholar
- 6.Vassel B, Nesbitt LL (1945) The nitrogenous constituents of flaxseed. J Biol Chem 159:571–584Google Scholar
- 7.Holm H, Hanssen LE, Krogdahl A, Florholmen J (1988) High and low inhibitor soybean meals affect human duodenal proteinase activity differently - in vivo comparison with bovine serum-albumin. J Nutr 118:515–520Google Scholar
- 8.Liener IE (1994) Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34:31–67. doi: 10.1080/10408399409527649
- 10.Alzueta C, Ortiz LT, Rebole A, Rodriguez ML, Centeno C, Trevino J (2002) Effects of removal of mucilage and enzyme or sepiolite supplement on the nutrient digestibility and metabolyzable energy of a diet containing linseed in broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 97:169–181. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00030-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lorenc-Kubis I, Kowalska JB, Pochroń Zuzło A, Wilusz T (2001) Isolation and amino acid sequence of a serine proteinase inhibitor from common flax (Linum usitatissimum) seeds. Chembiochem 2:41–51. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20010105)2:1<45::AID-CBIC45>3.0.CO;2-# CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Xavier-Filho J, Campos FAP, Ary MB, Silva CP, Carvalho MMM, Macedo MLR, Lemos FJA, Grant G (1989) Poor correlation between the levels of proteinase-inhibitors found in seeds of different cultivars of cowpea (Vigna-Unguiculata) and the resistance susceptibility to predation by Callosobruchusmaculatus. J Agric Food Chem 37:1139–1143. doi: 10.1021/jf00088a071
- 17.Reeves PG (1997) Components of the AIN-93 diets as improvements in the AIN-76A diet. J Nutr 127(5, Suppl):838S–841SGoogle Scholar
- 18.AOAC (1984) Official methods for analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 14th edn. AOAC International, Arlington, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pellet PR, Young VL (1980) Nutritional evaluation of protein foods. Food Nutr Bull 4:154Google Scholar
- 21.Deshpande SS, Nielsen SS (1987) In vitro enzymatic-hydrolysis of phaseolin, the major storage protein of Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Food Sci 52:1326–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14074.x
- 22.Liener IE, Thompson RM (1980) In vitro and in vivo studies on the digestibility of the major storage protein of the navy bean (Phaseolusvulgaris). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 30:13–25Google Scholar
- 23.Agudelo RA, Alarcon OM, Fliedel G (1998) Effect of cooking on the protein digestibility of sorghum. Arch Latinoam Nutr 48:47–51Google Scholar
- 24.Araújo AH, Cardoso PCB, Pereira RA, Lima LM, Oliveira AS, Miranda MRA, Xavier-Filho J, Sales MP (2002) In vitro digestibility of globulins from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and xerophitic algaroba (Prosopis juliflora) seeds by mammalian digestive proteinases: a comparative study. Food Chem 78:143–147. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00021-5
- 25.Lima LM, Araujo AH, Oliveira AS, Pereira RA, Miranda MRA, Sales MP (2004) Comparative digestibility and the inhibition of mammalian digestive enzymes from mature and immature cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) seeds. Food Control 15:107–110. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00021-5
- 26.Shashikala M, Prakash J (1995) In vitro digestibility of proteins in black gram (Phaseolus mungo) and green gram (Phaseolus radiatus) papads. Nahrung 39:42–47. doi: 10.1002/food.19950390105
- 29.Cruz ACB, Massena FS, Migliolo L, Macedo LLP, Monteiro NKV, Oliveira AS, Macedo FP, Uchoa AF, Grossi-De-Sá MF, Vasconcelos IM, Murad AM, Franco OL, Santos EA (2013) Bioinsecticidal activity of a novel Kunitz trypsin inhibitor from Catanduva (Piptadenia moniliformis) seeds. Plant Phys Biochem 70:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Liener IE (1985) The nutritional significance of naturally occurring toxins in plant foodstuffs. Toxicon 23:544Google Scholar