Genetic Diversity for Seed Mineral Composition in the Wild Legume Teramnus labialis
- 136 Downloads
Teramnus labialis (L.) Spreng. is a wild, tropical legume whose seeds are collected and used as a food source by tribal populations. In order to assess the potential of this legume to provide dietary minerals for humans, fourteen diverse accessions were grown under controlled, nutrient-replete conditions and seeds were harvested for mineral analysis. The germplasm originated from Indonesia, Africa, the Caribbean, and South America. Seed concentrations of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sodium (Na), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) were found to fall within the range of published values for several cultivated grain legumes, while calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) were higher in T. labialis seeds. Mineral concentrations across the diverse accessions showed ranges of 1.3- to 2.3-fold for the macronutrient minerals (Ca, Mg, P, K) and 1.8- to 15.9-fold for the micronutrient minerals (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Na). The existing genetic diversity in this wild legume, especially for the essential minerals Ca and Mg, could be exploited to develop T. labialis as a new cultivated legume for tropical regions of the world.
KeywordsCalcium Germplasm Magnesium Seed minerals Wild legume
This work was funded in part by funds from USDA-ARS under Agreement No. 58-6250-6-001. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Department of Agriculture, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. The author wishes to thank Brad Morris (USDA-ARS, Griffin, Georgia USA) and Theodore Hymowitz (University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois USA) for providing the germplasm used in this study.
- 2.Grusak MA (2005) Legumes: types and nutritional value. In: Allen L, Prentice A (eds) Encyclopedia of human nutrition, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York, pp 120–125Google Scholar
- 3.Rodrigues BF, Torne SG (1991) A chemical study of seeds in three Canavalia species. Trop Sci 31:101–103Google Scholar
- 4.Mohan VR, Janardhanan K (1995) Chemical determination of nutritional and antinutritional properties in tribal pulses. J Food Science Technol 32:465–469Google Scholar
- 9.Grusak MA, Cakmak I (2005) Methods to improve the crop-delivery of minerals to humans and livestock. In: Broadley MR, White PJ (eds) Plant nutritional genomics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 265–286Google Scholar
- 13.Funes F, Perez C (1976) Agronomical studies on perennial soybean. I. Comparison between Glycine wightii and Teramnus labialis under cutting and grazing conditions. Cuban J Agric Sci 10:199–209Google Scholar
- 14.Rika IK, Mendra IK, Gusti Oka M, Oka Nurjaya MG (1991) Forage species for coconut plantations in Bali. In: Shelton HM, Stür WW (eds) Forages for plantation crops. ACIAR Proceedings No.32. Canberra: ACIAR, pp 41–44Google Scholar
- 15.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2007) USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 20. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page, http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata
- 16.Beebe S, Gonzalez AV, Rengifo J (2000) Research on trace minerals in the common bean. Food Nutr Bull 21:387–391Google Scholar
- 17.Raboy V, Dickinson DB, Below FE (1984) Variation in seed total phosphorus, phytic acid, zinc, calcium, magnesium, and protein among lines of Glycine max and G. soja. Crop Sci 24:431–434Google Scholar