Abstract
We present a way to create entangled states of two superconducting transmon qutrits based on circuit QED. Here, a qutrit refers to a three-level quantum system. Since only resonant interaction is employed, the entanglement creation can be completed within a short time. The degree of entanglement for the prepared entangled state can be controlled by varying the weight factors of the initial state of one qutrit, which allows the prepared entangled state to change from a partially entangled state to a maximally entangled state. Because a single cavity is used, only resonant interaction is employed, and none of identical qutrit–cavity coupling constant, measurement, and auxiliary qutrit is needed, this proposal is easy to implement in experiments. The proposal is quite general and can be applied to prepare a two-qutrit partially or maximally entangled state with two natural or artificial atoms of a ladder-type level structure, coupled to an optical or microwave cavity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shor, P.W.: In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Santa Fe (1994)
Ekert, A.K.: Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991)
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crepeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
Schumacher, B.: Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996)
Buzek, V., Hillery, M.: Quantum copying: beyond the no-cloning theorem. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844 (1996)
You, J.Q., Tsai, J.S., Nori, F.: Controllable manipulation of macroscopic quantum states in coupled charge qubits. Phys. Rev. B 68, 024510 (2003)
Wei, L.F., Liu, Y.X., Nori, F.: Testing Bell’s inequality in constantly coupled Josephson circuits by effective single-qubit operations. Phys. Rev. B 72, 104516 (2005)
Wei, L.F., Liu, Y.X., Nori, F.: Generation and control of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 246803 (2006)
Wei, L.F., Liu, Y.X., Storcz, M.J., Nori, F.: Macroscopic Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen pairs in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. A 73, 052307 (2006)
Yang, C.P., Chu, S.I., Han, S.: Possible realization of entanglement, logical gates, and quantum-information transfer with superconducting-quantum-interference-device qubits in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042311 (2003)
You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Quantum information processing with superconducting qubits in a microwave field. Phys. Rev. B 68, 064509 (2003)
Blais, A., Huang, R.S., Wallraff, A., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: an architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004)
You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Superconducting circuits and quantum information. Phys. Today 58, 42 (2005)
Clarke, J., Wilhelm, F.K.: Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031 (2008)
You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature 474, 589 (2011)
Xiang, Z.L., Ashhab, S., You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Hybrid quantum circuits: superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013)
Gu, X., Kockum, A.F., Miranowicz, A., Liu, Y.X., Nori, F.: Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits. Phys. Rep. 718–719, 1–102 (2017)
Blais, A., van den Maassen, B.A., Zagoskin, A.M.: Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 127901 (2003)
Zhu, S.L., Wang, Z.D., Zanardi, P.: Geometric quantum computation and multiqubit entanglement with superconducting qubits inside a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 100502 (2005)
Feng, W., Wang, P., Ding, X., Xu, L., Li, X.Q.: Generating and stabilizing the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state in circuit QED: joint measurement, Zeno effect, and feedback. Phys. Rev. A 83, 042313 (2011)
Aldana, S., Wang, Y.D., Bruder, C.: Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger generation protocol for N superconducting transmon qubits capacitively coupled to a quantum bus. Phys. Rev. B 84, 134519 (2011)
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zheng, S.B., Nori, F.: Entangling superconducting qubits in a multi-cavity system. New J. Phys. 18, 013025 (2016)
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zheng, S.B., Han, S.: Generating entanglement between microwave photons and qubits in multiple cavities coupled by a superconducting qutrit. Phys. Rev. A 87, 022320 (2013)
Fedorov, A., Steffen, L., Baur, M., da Silva, M.P., Wallraff, A.: Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits. Nature 481, 170 (2012)
Leek, P.J., Filipp, S., Maurer, P., Baur, M., Bianchetti, R., Fink, J.M., Göppl, M., Steffen, L., Wallraff, A.: Using sideband transitions for two-qubit operations in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. B 79, 180511(R) (2009)
DiCarlo, L., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M., Bishop, L.S., Johnson, B.R., Schuster, D.I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 460, 240 (2009)
Ansmann, M., Wang, H., Bialczak, R.C., Hofheinz, M., Lucero, E., Neeley, M., O’Connell, A.D., Sank, D., Weides, M., Wenner, J., Cleland, A.N., Martinis, J.M.: Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461, 504 (2009)
Chow, J.M., DiCarlo, L., Gambetta, J.M., Nunnenkamp, A., Bishop, L.S., Frunzio, L., Devoret, M.H., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Detecting highly entangled states with a joint qubit readout. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062325 (2010)
DiCarlo, L., Reed, M.D., Sun, L., Johnson, B.R., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M., Frunzio, L., Girvin, S.M., Devoret, M.H., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit. Nature 467, 574 (2010)
Song, C., et al.: 10-Qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting circuit. arXiv:1703.10302
Barends, R., et al.: Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance. Nature 508, 500 (2014)
Cirac, J.I., Zoller, P.: Preparation of macroscopic superpositions in many-atom systems. Phys. Rev. A 50, 2799(R) (1994)
Gerry, C.C.: Preparation of multiatom entangled states through dispersive atom-cavity-field interactions. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2857 (1996)
Zheng, S.B.: One-step synthesis of multiatom Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230404 (2001)
Zheng, S.B.: Quantum-information processing and multiatom-entanglement engineering with a thermal cavity. Phys. Rev. A 66, 060303 (2002)
Duan, L.M., Kimble, H.: Efficient engineering of multiatom entanglement through single-photon detections. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 253601 (2003)
Wang, X., Feng, M., Sanders, B.C.: Multipartite entangled states in coupled quantum dots and cavity QED. Phys. Rev. A 67, 022302 (2003)
Yang, W., Xu, Z., Feng, M., Du, J.: Entanglement of separate nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to a whispering-gallery mode cavity. New J. Phys. 12, 113039 (2010)
Chen, Q., Yang, W., Feng, M., Du, J.: Entangling separate nitrogen-vacancy centers in a scalable fashion via coupling to microtoroidal resonators. Phys. Rev. A 83, 054305 (2011)
Koch, J., et al.: Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007)
Yu, Y., Han, S.: Private communication
Neeley, M., et al.: Process tomography of quantum memory in a Josephson-phase qubit coupled to a two-level state. Nat. Phys. 4, 523 (2008)
Zagoskin, A.M., Ashhab, S., Johansson, J.R., Nori, F.: Quantum two-level systems in Josephson junctions as naturally formed qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 077001 (2006)
Leek, P.J., et al.: Using sideband transitions for two-qubit operations in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. B 79, 180511(R) (2009)
Strand, J.D., et al.: First-order sideband transitions with flux-driven asymmetric transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. B 87, 220505(R) (2013)
Xiang, Z.L., Lü, X.Y., Li, T.F., You, J.Q., Nori, F.: Hybrid quantum circuit consisting of a superconducting flux qubit coupled to a spin ensemble and a transmission-line resonator. Phys. Rev. B 87, 144516 (2013)
Neumann, P., Kolesov, R., Jacques, V., Beck, J., Tisler, J., Batalov, A., Rogers, L., Manson, N.B., Balasubramanian, G., Jelezko, F., Wrachtrup, J.: Excited-state spectroscopy of single NV defects in diamond using optically detected magnetic resonance. New J. Phys. 11, 013017 (2009)
Pradhan, P., Anantram, M.P., Wang, K.L.: Quantum computation by optically coupled steady atoms/quantum-dots inside a quantum electro-dynamic cavity. arXiv:quant-ph/0002006
Yang, C.P., Su, Q.P., Zheng, S.B., Nori, F., Han, S.: Entangling two oscillators with arbitrary asymmetric initial states. Phys. Rev. A 95, 052341 (2017)
DiCarlo, L., et al.: Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit. Nature 467, 574 (2010)
Baur, M., Filipp, S., Bianchetti, R., Fink, J.M., Göppl, M., Steffen, L., Leek, P.J., Blais, A., Wallraff, A.: Measurement of Autler–Townes and mollow transitions in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 243602 (2009)
Rigetti, C., et al.: Superconducting qubit in waveguide cavity with coherence time approaching 0.1 ms. Phys. Rev. B 86, 100506(R) (2012)
Chang, J.B., et al.: Improved superconducting qubit coherence using titanium nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 012602 (2013)
Chow, J.M., et al.: Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric. Nat. Commun. 5, 4015 (2014)
Peterer, M.J., et al.: Coherence and decay of higher energy levels of a superconducting transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 010501 (2015)
You, J.Q., et al.: Low-decoherence flux qubit. Phys. Rev. B 75, 140515(R) (2007)
Sank, D., et al.: Measurement-induced state transitions in a superconducting qubit: beyond the rotating wave approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190503 (2016)
Chen, W., Bennett, D.A., Patel, V., Lukens, J.E.: Substrate and process dependent losses in superconducting thin film resonators. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 075013 (2008)
Leek, P.J., Baur, M., Fink, J.M., Bianchetti, R., Steffen, L., Filipp, S., Wallraff, A.: Cavity quantum electrodynamics with separate photon storage and qubit readout modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100504 (2010)
Yang, C.P., Chu, S.I., Han, S.: Quantum information transfer and entanglement with SQUID qubits in cavity QED: a dark-state scheme with tolerance for nonuniform device parameter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 117902 (2004)
Yang, C.P., Han, S.: n-Qubit-controlled phase gate with superconducting quantum-interference devices coupled to a resonator. Phys. Rev. A 72, 032311 (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under Grant No. 2015J01020, the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. LZ13A040002, the NKRDP of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301802), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. (11074062, 11374083, 11774076).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
We here give a derivation on the state transformations induced by the application of the pulses, for the operations of steps 1, 5, and 9 described above.
For step 1: A microwave pulse of {\(\omega _{10},-\pi /2,\pi /\left( 4 {{\varOmega }}_{10}\right) \)} and then a microwave pulse of {\(\omega _{21},-\pi /2,\pi /\left( 2{{\varOmega }}_{21}\right) \)} were applied to qutrit 2 (Fig. 2a). The first pulse results in \(\left| 0\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left( \left| 0\right\rangle _{2}+\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\right) /\sqrt{2}\) according to Eq. (2), while the second pulse leads to \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\) according to Eq. (3). After the two pulses, we thus have the state transformations:
where the first transformation is obtained after applying the first pulse, while the second transformation is achieved after applying the second pulse. Note that the state \(\left| 0\right\rangle _{2}\) remains unchanged during the second pulse because the pulse is highly detuned (or decoupled) from the \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\) transition of qutrit 2.
For step 5: The microwave pulses of {\(\omega _{10},-\pi /2,\pi /\left( 2 {{\varOmega }}_{10}\right) \)}, {\(\omega _{21},\pi /2,\pi /\left( 4 {{\varOmega }}_{21}\right) \)}, {\(\omega _{10},\pi /2,3\pi /\left( 4 {{\varOmega }}_{10}\right) \)}, and then {\(\omega _{21},\pi /2,\pi /\left( 2{{\varOmega }}_{21}\right) \)} were applied to qutrit 2 in turn (Fig. 2d). According to Eqs. (2) and (3), the first pulse results in \( \left| 0\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left| 1\right\rangle _{2},\) the second pulse results in \(\left( \left| 1\right\rangle _{2}+\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\right) /\sqrt{2}\rightarrow \left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\) and \(\left( -\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}+\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\right) /\sqrt{2}\rightarrow \left| 2\right\rangle _{2},\) the third pulse results in \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left( \left| 0\right\rangle _{2}-\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\right) / \sqrt{2}\) but nothing to the state \(\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\), and the last pulse leads to \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow -\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\) and \(\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \left| 1\right\rangle _{2}.\) Based on these results, we can obtain the following state transformations:
where the first, second, third, and last transformations are obtained after applying the first, second, third, and the last pulses, respectively.
For step 9: A microwave pulse of {\(\omega _{21},\pi /2,\pi /\left( 2{{\varOmega }}_{21}\right) \)} and then a microwave pulse of {\(\omega _{10},\pi /2,\pi /\left( 4{{\varOmega }}_{10}\right) \)} were applied to qutrit 2 (Fig. 2a). The first pulse results in \(\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \) \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\) and \(\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\rightarrow \) \(-\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}\), while the second pulse leads to \(\left( \left| 0\right\rangle _{2}+\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\right) /\sqrt{2}\rightarrow \) \(\left| 0\right\rangle _{2}\) and \(\left( -\left| 0\right\rangle _{2}+\left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\right) /\sqrt{2}\rightarrow \left| 1\right\rangle _{2}\) but nothing to the state \(\left| 2\right\rangle _{2}.\) Based on these results, one can have the following state transformations:
where the first transformation is obtained after the first pulse, while the second transformation is achieved after the second pulse.
Note that the p1, p2, p3, and p4 above represent the first, second, third, and fourth pulses, respectively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, XM., Zheng, ZF., Lu, DM. et al. Circuit QED: generation of two-transmon-qutrit entangled states via resonant interaction. Quantum Inf Process 17, 99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1861-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1861-6