Quantum discord of ensemble of quantum states
- 256 Downloads
We highlight an information-theoretic meaning of quantum discord as the gap between the accessible information and the Holevo bound in the framework of ensemble of quantum states. This complementary relationship implies that a large amount of preexisting arguments about the evaluation of quantum discord can be directly applied to the accessible information and vice versa. For an ensemble of two pure qubit states, we show that one can avoid the optimization problem with the help of the Koashi–Winter relation. Further, for the general case (two mixed qubit states), we recover the main results presented by Fuchs and Caves (Phys Rev Lett 73:3047, 1994), but totally from the perspective of quantum discord. Following this line of thought, we also investigate the geometric discord as an indicator of quantumness of ensembles in detail. Finally, we give an example to elucidate the difference between quantum discord and geometric discord with respect to optimal measurement strategies.
KeywordsQuantum ensembles Quantum discord Geometric discord Classically accessible information
Y. Yao wishes to thank Prof. Shunlong Luo for his helpful comments and valuable suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11121403, 10935010 and 11074261) and the National 973 Program (Grant Nos. 2012CB922104 and 2014CB921402).
- 7.Fuchs, C.A.: Just Two Nonorthogonal Quantum States. arXiv:9810032
- 9.Fuchs, C.A.: Distinguishability and accessible information in quantum theory. Ph.D. thesis, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 1996. arXiv:9601020
- 11.Fuchs, C.A., Sasaki, M.: The quantumness of a set of quantum states. arXiv:0302108
- 23.Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
- 31.Levitin, L.B.: Optimal quantum measurements for two pure and mixed states. In: Belavkin, V.P., Hirota, O., Hudson, R.L. (eds.) Quantum Communications and Measurement. Plenum Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar