We examine coherent processes in a two-state quantum system that is strongly coupled to a mesoscopic spin bath and weakly coupled to other environmental degrees of freedom. Our analysis is specifically aimed at understanding the quantum dynamics of solid-state quantum bits such as electron spins in semiconductor structures and superconducting islands. The role of mesoscopic degrees of freedom with long correlation times (local degrees of freedom such as nuclear spins and charge traps) in qubit-related dephasing is discussed in terms of a quasi-static bath. A mathematical framework simultaneously describing coupling to the slow mesoscopic bath and a Markovian environment is developed and the dephasing and decoherence properties of the total system are investigated. The model is applied to several specific examples with direct relevance to current experiments. Comparisons to experiments suggests that such quasi-static degrees of freedom play an important role in current qubit implementations. Several methods of mitigating the bath-induced error are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loss D., DiVincenzo D. (1998). Phys. Rev. A 57:120
Imamoglu A., Awschalom D.D., Burkard G., DiVincenzo D.P., Loss D., Sherwin M., Small A. (1999). Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:4204
Merkulov I.A., Efros A.L., Rosen M. (2002). Phys. Rev. B 65:205309
Khaetskii A.V., Loss D., Glazman L. (2002). Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:186802, URL http://publish.aps.org/abstract/prl/v88/p186802.
Taylor J.M., Marcus C.M., Lukin M.D. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:206803
Johnson A.C., Petta J., Taylor J.M., Lukin M.D., Marcus C.M., Hanson M.P., Gossard A.C. (2005). Nature 435:925
F. H. L. Koppens, J. A. Folk, J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L. H. Willems van , I. T. Vink, H.-P. Tranitz, W. Wegscheider, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Science p. 1113719 (2005), URL http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1113719v2.
Petta J.R., Johnson A.C., Taylor J.M., Laird E., Yacoby A., Lukin M.D., Marcus C.M. (2005). Science 309:2180
de Sousa R., Das Sarma S. (2003). Phys. Rev. B 67:033301
Coish W.A., Loss D. (2004). Phys. Rev. B 70:195340
Elzerman J.M., Hanson R., van Beveren L.H.W., Witkamp B., Vandersypen L.M.K., Kouwenhoven L.P. (2004). Nature 430:431
Fujisawa T., Tokura Y., Hirayama Y. (2001). Phys. Rev. B. (Rapid Comm.) 63:081304
Golovach V.N., Khaetskii A., Loss D. (2004). Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:016601
Hanson R., Witkamp B., Vandersypen L.M.K., van Beveren L.H.W., Elzerman J.M., Kouwenhoven L.P. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:196802
Vion D., Aassime A., Cottet A., Joyez P., Pothier H., Urbina C., Esteve D., Devorett M. (2002). Science 296:886
Pashkin A., Yamamoto T., Astafiev O., Nakamura Y., Averin D., Tsai J. (2003). Nature 421:823
Chiorescu I., Nakamura Y., Harmans C., Mooij J. (2003). Science 299:1869
Martinis J., Nam S., Aumentado J., Urbina C. (2002). Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:117901
Simmonds R., Lang K.M., Hite D.A., Nam S., Pappas D.P., Martinis J.M. (2004). Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:077003
Makhlin Y., Shnirman A. (2004). Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:178301
Falci G., D’Arrigo A., Mastellone A., Paladino E. (2005). Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:167002
Stamp P. (2003). The Physics of Communication. World Scientific, New Jersey, chap. 3, pp. 39–82.
Taylor J.M., Imamoglu A., Lukin M.D. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:246802
Weissman M.B. (1988). Rev. Mod. Phys. 60:537
D. Klauser, W. A. Coish, and D. Loss, e-print: cond-mat/0510177 (2005).
Coish W.A., Loss D. (2005). Phys. Rev. B 72:125337
X. Hu and S. D. Sarma, e-print: cond-mat/0507725 (2005).
Zurek W.H. (1981). Phys. Rev. D 24:1516
Prokof’ev N.V., Stamp P.C.E. (2000). Reports Prog Phys 63:669
Rose G., Smirnov A.Y. (2001). J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 13:11027
Zanardi P., Rasetti M. (1997). Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:3306
Viola L., Lloyd S. (1998). Phys. Rev. A 58:2733
The breakdown of the two-level approximation in superconductor-based qubit designs has already been explored in great detail (Burkard et al. Phys. Rev B. 69, 064503 (2004)) and we instead focus on other sources of error due to local spins, charge traps, etc.
Feynman R.P., Vernon F.L. (1963). Ann. Phys. 24:118
Magnus W. (1954). Commun. Pure Appl. Math 7:649
Cottet A., et al. (2001). Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, p. 111
G. Giedke, J. M. Taylor, D. D’Alessandro, M. D. Lukin, and A. Imamoglu, e-print: quantph/ 0508144 (2005).
J. M. Taylor, J. Petta, A. C. Johnson, A. Yacoby, C. M. Marcus, and M. D. Lukin, (in preparation) (2006).
de Sousa R., Das Sarma S. (2003). Phys. Rev. B 68:115322
W. Yao, R.-B. Liu, and L. J. Sham, e-print: cond-mat/0508441 (2005).
Deng C., Hu X. (2005). Phys. Rev. B 72:165333
Paget D. (1982). Phys. Rev. B 25:4444
G. Teklemariam, E. M. Fortunato, C. C. Lopez, J. Emerson, J. P. Paz, T. F. Havel, and D. G. Cory, e-print: quant-ph/0303115 (2003).
For an arbitrary, quasi-static bath (i.e., not necessary a spin-bath) with a density matrix that is diagonal in the eigenbasis of \(\hat{A}_z\), \(\Phi_{\rm FID} = e^{-i \delta t} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d \Lambda \rho(\Lambda) e^{-i \Lambda t}\), demonstrating that Φ FID is exactly the inverse Fourier transform of the bath degree of freedom in this case.
By assuming the bath density matrix is diagonal in the \(\hat{A}_z\) eigenbasis, the result derived (Eqn. 40) in fact is generally true for any bath that is non-singular (ρ sym (ω ≥ Ω) not singular) and satisfies u ≥ 0, not just a spin-bath. However, the spin-bath provides a natural case for \([\hat{H}_B,\hat{A}_z] \simeq 0\), as mentioned in the text.
Well-separated singularities in ρsym can be treated as additional stationary phase integral terms, and for each, corresponding oscillations at the resonance with different time-scales u j will emerge.
Gardiner C.W. (1985). Handbook of stochastic methods. Spinger, Berlin, 2nd ed.
Mehring M. (1976). High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy in Solids. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Paget D., Lampel G., Sapoval B., Safarov V. (1977). Phys. Rev. B 15:5780
Waugh J., Huber L., Haeberlen U. (1968). Phys. Rev. Lett. 20:180
Kautz R., Martinis J. (1990). Phys. Rev. B 42:9903
Galperin Y.M., Gurevich V.L. (1991). Phys. Rev. B 43:12900
Caldeira A.O., Leggett A.J. (1983). Ann. Phys. 149:347
Chattah A.K., lvarez G.A., Levstein P.R., Cucchietti F.M., Pastawski H.M., Raya J., Hirschinger J. (2003). J. Chem. Phys. 119:7943
Danieli E.P., Pastawski H.M., Álvarez G.A. (2005). Chem. Phys. Lett. 402:88
Facchi P., Tasaki S., Pascazio S., Nakazato H., Tokuse A., Lidar D. (2005). Phys. Rev. A 71:022302
Imamolgu A., Knill E., Tian L., Zoller P. (2003). Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:017402
Arecchi F.T., Courtens E., Gilmore R., Thomas H. (1972). Phys. Rev. A 6:2211, URL http://80-link.aps.org.ezp1.harvard.edu/abstract/PRA/v6/p2211.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to Anton Zeilinger, whose work has inspired exploration of quantum phenomenon in many avenues of physics and beyond.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, J.M., Lukin, M.D. Dephasing of Quantum Bits by a Quasi-Static Mesoscopic Environment. Quantum Inf Process 5, 503–536 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0036-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0036-z