Public Choice

, 149:337 | Cite as

Does terror increase aid?

Open Access


This article investigates empirically whether, and in what ways, donors in the Development Assistance Committee respond to transnational terrorist incidents and the onset of the War on Terror by changing aid effort and aid allocation. First, an analysis of 22 donor countries shows that aid effort increased during the War on Terror period, but did not respond to the actual number of terror events. Second, using aid allocation equations, we find that countries where terror originates are not more likely to receive aid as a consequence, but if they are selected, they receive larger amounts of aid. Our results imply that politicians may still have to learn from economic research. To the extent that development aid can effectively combat terror across the world, as recent research suggests it does, politicians would be well-advised to target aid to those countries where terrorist groups exist in abundance.


Foreign aid Transnational terrorism War on Terror and aid DAC donors Heckman selection model 

JEL Classification



  1. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abadie, A. (2006). Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. American Economic Review, 96(2), 50–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AusAID (2003). Counter-terrorism and Australian aid. Canberra: AusAID Public Affairs Group. Accessed May 15, 2011.
  5. Azam, J.-P., & Delacroix, A. (2006). Aid and the delegated fight against terrorism. Review of Development Economics, 10(2), 330–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azam, J.-P., & Thelen, V. (2008). The roles of foreign aid and education in the War on Terror. Public Choice, 135(3–4), 375–397. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azam, J.-P., & Thelen, V. (2010). Foreign aid vs. military intervention in the War on Terror. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(2), 237–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azam, J.-P., & Thelen, V. (2011). Where to spend foreign aid to counter terrorism. Paper presented at the EPCS, Rennes, 2011. Google Scholar
  9. Bandyopadhyay, S., Sandler, T., & Younas, J. (2011). Foreign aid as counterterrorism policy. Oxford Economic Papers, 63(3), 423–447. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bapat, N. A. (2011). Transnational terrorism, US military aid, and the incentive to misrepresent. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 303–318. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbieri, K., Keshk, O., & Pollins, B. (2008). Correlates of war project trade data set codebook, Version 2.0. Ohio: The Ohio State University. Accessed October 15, 2010.
  12. Bertoli, S., Cornia, G. A., & Manaresi, F. (2008). Aid effort and its determinants: A comparison of the Italian performance with other OECD donors (Working paper 11/2008). Florence: Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Universita’ degli Studi di Firenze. Google Scholar
  13. Blomberg, S. B., Gaibulloev, K., & Sandler, T. (this issue). Terrorist group survival: ideology, tactics, and base of operations. Public Choice. doi: 10.1007/s11127-011-9837-4.
  14. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. BP (2010). BP statistical review of world energy. Accessed December 3, 2010.
  16. Campos, N., & Gassebner, M. (2009). International terrorism, political instability and the escalation effect (CEPR Discussion Paper 7226). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Google Scholar
  17. Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101. Google Scholar
  18. Council of the European Union (2004). EU–US Declaration on Combating Terrorism. Dromoland Castle, 26 June 2004, 10760/04 (Presse 205). Available at: Accessed May 2011.
  19. DFA (2001). EU development ministers respond to humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. Press releases. Department of Foreign Affairs. Accessed May 27, 2011.
  20. Doucouliagos, H., & Paldam, M. (2008). Aid effectiveness on growth: a meta study. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(1), 1–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dreher, A., & Fuchs, A. (2011a). Does terror increase aid? (Discussion Paper). Goettingen: Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity and Growth’ No. 86. Google Scholar
  22. Dreher, A., & Fuchs, A. (2011b). Rogue aid? The determinants of China’s aid allocation (Discussion Paper). Goettingen: Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity and Growth’ No. 93. Google Scholar
  23. Dreher, A., Thiele, R., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2008). Does aid for education educate children? Evidence from panel data. World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 291–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. EM-DAT (2010). The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. Louvain: Université Catholique de Louvain. Accessed October 4, 2010.
  25. Fleck, R. K., & Kilby, C. (2010). Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 185–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freedom House (2009). Freedom in the World 2009. Washington: Freedom House. Accessed February 12, 2011. Google Scholar
  27. Gassebner, M., Jong-A-Pin, R., & Mierau, J. (2008). Terrorism and electoral accountability: one strike, you’re out! Economics Letters, 100(1), 126–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gassebner, M., Jong-A-Pin, R., & Mierau, J. (2012, forthcoming). Terrorism and cabinet duration. International Economic Review. Google Scholar
  29. Humphreys, M. (2005). Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution: uncovering the mechanisms. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 508–537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilby, C. (2009). The political economy of conditionality: an empirical analysis of World Bank loan disbursements. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 51–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilby, C. (2011). Informal influence in the Asian Development Bank. Review of International Organizations 3–4, 223–257. Google Scholar
  32. Kilby, C., & Dreher, A. (2010). The impact of aid on growth revisited: do donor motives matter? Economics Letters, 107(3), 338–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krueger, A. B., & Maleckova, J. (2003). Education, poverty and terrorism: is there a causal connection? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 119–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mickolus, E. F. (1980). Transnational Terrorism. Westport: Greenwood Press. Google Scholar
  35. Mickolus, E. F., Sandler, T., Murdock, J. M., & Flemming, P. A. (2009). International terrorism: attributes of terrorist events, 1968–2008 (ITERATE 5). Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software, Inc. Google Scholar
  36. Moss, T. J., Standley, S., & Roodman, D. (2005). The Global War on Terror and U.S. development assistance: USAID allocation by country, 1998–2005 (CGD Working Paper 62). Washington: Center for Global Development. Google Scholar
  37. Neumayer, E. (2002). Is good governance rewarded? A cross-national analysis of debt forgiveness. World Development, 30(6), 913–930. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. OECD DAC (2003). A development co-operation lens on terrorism prevention: key entry points for action. DAC Guidelines and Reference Series. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Assistance Committee. Google Scholar
  39. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. Google Scholar
  40. Round, J. I., & Odedokun, M. (2004). Aid effort and its determinants. International Review of Economics & Finance, 13(3), 293–309. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharma, S., Davis, Z., & Findley, M. (2009). Deadly gift? The effect of foreign aid on terrorism (Mimeo). Provo: Brigham Young University. Google Scholar
  42. Shugart, W.F. II (2011). Terrorism in rational choice perspective. In C. J. Coyne (Ed.), The handbook of the political economy of war (pp. 126–153). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  43. taz (2001). Das Ende der Almosen. die tageszeitung. 18 October 2001. Google Scholar
  44. Union of International Associations (1984–2007). Yearbook of international organizations. Munich: Saur. Google Scholar
  45. Voeten, E., & Merdzanovic, A. (2009). United Nations General Assembly Voting Data. UNF:3:Hpf6qOkDdzzvXF9m66yLTg==V1 [Version]. Accessed October 12, 2010.
  46. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woods, N. (2005). The shifting politics of foreign aid. International Affairs, 81(2), 393–409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young, J. K., & Findley, M. G. (this issue). Can peace be bought? A sectoral-level analysis of aid’s influence on transnational terrorism. Public Choice. doi: 10.1007/s11127-011-9875-y.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alfred-Weber-Institute for Economics, Faculty of Economic SciencesHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.University of GoettingenGoettingenGermany
  3. 3.CESifoMunichGermany
  4. 4.IZABonnGermany
  5. 5.KOF Swiss Economic InstituteZurichSwitzerland
  6. 6.Faculty of Economic SciencesGeorg-August University GoettingenGoettingenGermany
  7. 7.Alfred-Weber-Institute for EconomicsHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations