Public Choice

, Volume 151, Issue 3–4, pp 807–810 | Cite as

Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki: Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2010. xv + 414 pages. USD 40.00 (cloth)
  • Paul H. Edelman
Book Review


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balinski, M., & Young, H. P. (2001). Fair representation, meeting the ideal of one man, one vote (2nd ed.). Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar
  2. Edelman, P. H. (2011). The institutional dimension of election design. Public Choice. doi: 10.1007/s11127-011-9794-y. Google Scholar
  3. Felsenthal, D., & Machover, M. (2008). The majority judgment voting procedure: a critical evaluation. Homo Oeconomicus, 25(3–4), 319–334. Google Scholar
  4. Galton, F. (1907). One vote, one value. Nature, 75(1948), 414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Zahid, M. A. (2009). Majority judgment theory and paradoxical results (Working paper). Tilburg University, Netherlands. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and the Law SchoolVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations