The evolution of sharing rules in rent seeking contests: Incentives crowd out cooperation
- 284 Downloads
Modern societies are characterized by competing organizations that rely predominantly on incentive schemes to align the behavior of their members with the organizations’ objectives. This study contributes to explaining why in so many cases incentive schemes have gradually crowded out cooperation as an organization device. Our explanation does not draw on free-riding, the obvious Achilles’ heel of cooperation, but relies completely on fundamental group contest mechanisms. By investigating a canonical rent seeking model and adopting an evolutionary perspective, the analysis identifies shortcomings in previous results, sets the record straight, and explains why the process of incentivizing organizations is protracted.
KeywordsGroup contests Rent-seeking Sharing rules Cooperation Incentives Evolution
JEL ClassificationD72 D74 M52
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baik, K. H., & Lee, D. Do rent-seeking groups announce their sharing rules? Economic Inquiry (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00280.x/pdf) (Forthcoming)
- Congleton, R. D., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. (Eds.) (2008). 40 years of research on rent seeking, vols. 1&2. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar
- Gächter, S., Kessler, E., & Königstein, M. (2009). Performance incentives and the dynamics of voluntary cooperation, http://www.vwa.unisg.ch/org/vwa/web.nsf/1176ad62df2ddb13c12568f000482b94/2ddd2b2a959a4296c125744a0034d626/$FILE/GaechterKesslerKoenigstein_12-02-09.pdf.
- Konrad, K. A. (2009). Strategy and dynamics in contests. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Nitzan, S., & Ueda, K. (2010). Prize sharing in collective contests. http://www.biu.ac.il/soc/ec/wp/2010-08.pdf
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
- Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of rent–seeking society (pp. 97–112). College Station: Taxas A&M University Press. Reprinted in Congleton et al. (2008). Google Scholar