Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 147, Issue 3–4, pp 481–496 | Cite as

Why Muslims like democracy yet have so little of it

  • Robbert Maseland
  • André van Hoorn
Open Access
Article

Abstract

This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive attitudes towards it in the Muslim world. It argues that this democracy paradox is understandable from the perspective of the principle of diminishing marginal utility: people value highly that of which they have little. This reasoning implies, however, that surveys like the World Values Surveys (WVS) elicit circumstance-driven marginal preferences rather than culturally determined attitudinal traits. Empirical evidence showing that individuals living in undemocratic societies have much more favorable inclinations towards democracy supports our argument.

Keywords

Culture Attitudes Marginal preferences Measurement Outcomes 

References

  1. Anckar, D. (2002). Why are small island states democracies? The Round Table, 365(1), 375–390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(1), 1–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), S158–S183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760–781. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 91(2), 67–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratton, M. (2003). Briefing: Islam, democracy, and public opinion in Africa. African Affairs, 102(408), 493–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clague, C., Gleason, S., & Knack, S. (2001). Determinants of lasting democracy in poor countries: Culture, development, and institutions. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social. Science, 573(1), 16–41. Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., McIntyre, C., Bauer-Kaase, P., & Kaase, M. (1999). The effect of economic priorities on the measurement of value change. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 637–647. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duch, R. M., & Taylor, M. A. (1993). Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 747–779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, G. S., & Gang, I. N. (2007). Understanding the development of fundamentalism. Public Choice, 132(3–4), 257–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Values Study Group & World Values Survey Association (2006). European and World Values Surveys four-wave integrated data file, 1981–2004. Available from http://www.jdsurvey.net.
  12. Evans, G., & Rose, P. (2007). Support for democracy in Malawi: does schooling matter? World Development, 35(5), 904–919. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fish, M. S. (2002). Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics, 55(1), 4–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  15. Glaeser, E., Ponzetto, G., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Why does democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12(2), 77–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glahe, F., & Vorhies, F. (1989). Religion, liberty and economic development: An empirical investigation. Public Choice, 62(3), 201–215. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hadenius, A. (1992). Democracy and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman, S. R. (2004). Islam and democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 37(6), 652–676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage. Google Scholar
  20. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar
  21. Huntington, S. P. (1984). Will more countries be democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations. Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
  24. Iannaccone, L. R. (1988). A formal model of church and sect. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S1), S241–S268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iannaccone, L. R. (1992a). Sacrifice and stigma: Reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 271–291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iannaccone, L. R. (1992b). Religious markets and the economics of religion. Social Compass, 39(1), 123–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Iannaccone, L. R., & Berman, E. (2006). Religious extremism: The good, the bad, and the deadly. Public Choice, 128(1–2), 109–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Inglehart, R. (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1289–1319 (Controversy with S. C. Flanagan). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R. (1988). The renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1203–1230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135, 63–70. Google Scholar
  33. Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Welzel, C. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1(3–4), 321–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jamal, A., & Tessler, M. (2008). The democracy barometers: attitudes in the Arab world. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 97–110. Google Scholar
  35. Kamens, D. (1988). Education and democracy: a comparative institutional analysis. Sociology and Education, 61(2), 114–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karatnycky, A. (2002). Muslim countries and the democracy gap. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 99–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  38. Kuran, T. (2003). The Islamic commercial crisis: institutional roots of economic underdevelopment in the Middle East. Journal of Economic History, 63(2), 414–447. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuran, T. (2009). Explaining the economic trajectories of civilizations: the systemic approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71(3), 593–605. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., Justensen, M. K., & Klemmensen, R. (2006). The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice, 128(1), 289–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. (2009). Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: a note on the Hofstede-GLOBE debate. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 527–532. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, A. (2010, forthcoming). Values and marginal preferences in international Business. Journal of International Business Studies. Google Scholar
  44. McCleary, R., & Barro, R. (2006). Religion and economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 49–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Midlarsky, M. I. (1998). Democracy and Islam: implications for civilizational conflict and the democratic peace. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 485–511. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Minkenberg, M. (2007). Democracy and religion: theoretical and empirical observations on the relationship between Christianity, Islam and liberal democracy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 887–909. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mogahed, D. (2006). Special report: Muslim world, Islam and democracy. Washington DC: Gallup Poll Consulting University Press. Google Scholar
  48. Moulton, B. R. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phelps, E. S. (2006). Economic culture and economic performance: What light is shed on the continent’s problem? Paper presented at he Conference of CESifo and Center on Capitalism and Society on “Perspectives on the Performance of the Continent’s Economies”, Venice, 21–22 July 2006. Google Scholar
  50. Rose, R. (2002). How Muslims view democracy. Journal of Democracy, 13(4), 102–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ross, M. L. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rowley, C. K., & Smith, N. (2009). Islam’s democracy paradox: Muslims claim to like democracy, so why do they have so little? Public Choice, 139(3), 273–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shafiq, M. N. (2009). Do education and income affect support for democracy in Muslim countries? Evidence from the Pew Global Attitudes Project. Economics of Education Review, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071. Google Scholar
  54. The Conference Board & Groningen Growth and Development Centre (2008). Total Economy Database. January 2008. Google Scholar
  55. Weil, D. N. (2009). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson/Wesley. Google Scholar
  56. Weiner, M. (1987). Empirical democratic theory. In M. Weiner & E. Özbudun (Eds.), Competitive elections in developing countries (pp. 3–34). Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for International Economics, Business & ManagementUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations