Public Choice

, 141:467 | Cite as

War and peace—cyclical phenomena?

  • Adam Knut Sture Jacobsson


This paper demonstrates how the analysis can differ dramatically between two common static modeling approaches to conflict. The first approach uses a one-period setup and associates positive arms investments with conflict. The second approach has two periods, where arming decisions are taken in the first period, and the decision on whether to go to war is taken separately in the second. Building on the latter approach, I introduce a repeated game protocol with myopic players. Under these circumstances countries may end up in cycles of war and peace. This result offers a novel explanation for a common pattern in history.


Appropriative competition Armed conflict Cyclical behavior 

JEL Classification

D74 C72 


  1. Alesina, A., & Spolaore, E. (2005). War, peace and the size of countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1333–1354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bester, H., & Wärneryd, K. (2006). Conflict and the Social Contract. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(2), 231–249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brito, D., & Intriligator, M. (1985). Conflict, war, and redistribution. The American Political Science Review, 79, 943–957. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edgeworth, F. (1925). Papers relating to political economy, 1. London: Macmillan and Co. Google Scholar
  5. Garfinkel, M. R., & Skaperdas, S. (Eds.) (1996). The political economy of conflict and appropriation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  6. Glicksberg, I. (1952). A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem. In Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. Providence: Am. Math. Soc. Google Scholar
  7. Grossman, H. (1991). A general equilibrium model of insurrection. American Economic Review, 81(4), 912–921. Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, H., & Kim, M. (1995). Swords or plowshares? A theory of the security of claims to property. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1275–1288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausken, K. (2000). Cooperation and between-group competition. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42, 417–425. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hausken, K. (2005). Production and conflict models versus rent-seeking models. Public Choice, 123, 59–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hess, G., & Orphanides, A. (2001). War and democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 776–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirshleifer, J. (1991). The paradox of power. Economics and Politics, 3(3), 177–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirshleifer, J. (1995). Anarchy and its breakdown. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 26–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirshleifer, J. (1999). There are many evolutionary pathways to cooperation. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1, 73–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirshleifer, J. (2000). The macrotechnology of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(6), 773–792. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirshleifer, J., & Martinez Coll, J. (1988). What strategies can support the evolutionary emergence of cooperation? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 367–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy, P. (1989). The rise and fall of the great powers. Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. London: Fontana. Google Scholar
  18. Martinez Coll, J., & Hirshleifer, J. (1991). The limits of reciprocity. Rationality and Society, 3, 35–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maxwell, J., & Reuveny, R. (2005). Continuing conflict. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 30–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neary, H. (1997). A comparison of rent-seeking models and economic models of conflict. Public Choice, 93, 373–388. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reuveny, R., & Maxwell, J. (2001). Conflict and renewable resources. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(6), 719–742. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson, L. (1939). Generalized foreign politics. The British Journal of Psychology, Monograph Supplement, II, 23. Google Scholar
  23. Skaperdas, S. (1992). Cooperation, conflict, and power in the absence of property rights. American Economic Review, 82(4), 720–739. Google Scholar
  24. Skaperdas, S. (1996). Contest success functions. Economic Theory, 7(2), 283–290. Google Scholar
  25. Skaperdas, S., & Syropoulos, C. (1996). Can the shadow of the future harm cooperation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 29, 355–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sokolski, H. D. (Ed.) (2004). Getting MAD: nuclear mutual assured destruction, its origins and practice. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. Google Scholar
  27. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent seeking society, Texas A&M University Economics Series. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. Google Scholar
  28. Wärneryd, K. (1993). Anarchy, uncertainty, and the emergence of property rights. Economics and Politics, 5(1), 1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations