Public Choice

, Volume 130, Issue 3–4, pp 437–456 | Cite as

Why party and how much? The Soviet State and the party finance

Original Article


Archival data on annual budgets of the Communist party shed light on how this cornerstone Soviet institution was maintained and on the party-state relationships in a one-party polity. The party depended on subsidies from the state budget until the mid-1950s and became largely self-financed afterwards. The costs of maintaining the party were significant compared to other branches of government. We consider three models of the party – “party-agent”, “party-ruler” and “party-political club” – to study the evolution of the party’s institutional role and find that by the 1950s, the party transforms from an economic agent of the state into an increasingly autonomous institution.


Soviet Union One-party regime Public finance Institutions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldrich, J. (1995). Why parties? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G.M., & Boettke, P.J. (1997). Soviet venality: a rent-seeking model of the communist state. Public Choice, 93(1–2), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archives of the Soviet Communist Party and Soviet State [ASCP], Microfilm Collection, Hoover Institution Archives.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, A. (1969). National income accounting in the USSR. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corp.Google Scholar
  6. Belova, E., & Gregory, P. (2002). Dictator, loyal, and opportunistic agents. Public Choice, 113(3–4), 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belova, E. (2001). Economic crime and punishment. In P. Gregory (Ed.), Behind the Façade of the Stalinist Economy (pp. 131–58). Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bergson, A. (1961). The real national income of Soviet Russia since 1928. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Birman, I. (1980). The financial crisis in the USSR. Soviet Studies, (32), 84–105.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrero, M. (2001). Political exchange in mass party Regimes and the transition from socialism. Economic Systems, 25(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gershenson, D., & Grossman, H. (2001). Cooption and repression in the Soviet Union. Economics and Politics, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gomulka, S., & Schaffer, M. (1990). A new method of long-run growth accounting with applications to the Soviet economy 1928–87 and the US economy 1949–78. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, CEP, Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
  13. Gregory, P., & Harrison, M. (2005). Allocation under dictatorship: research in Stalin’s archives. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 721–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregory, P., & Stuart, R. (2001). Russian and Soviet economic performance and structure. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Gregory, P., & Tikhonov, A. (2000). Central planning and unintended consequences: creating the Soviet financial system, 1930–1939. Journal of Economic History, 60(4), 1017–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory, P. (2004). The political economy of Stalinism. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grossman, G. (1986). Inflationary, political, and social implications of the current economic slowdown. In Höhmann, H. Nove, A. & Vogel, H. (Eds.), Economics and Politics in the USSR: Problems of Interdependence (pp. 172–197). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Harrison, M., & Kim, B.Y. (2006). Corruption and growth in a partially centralized economy. Journal of Economic History, (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Hoover, D., Rice, J., Wu, C., & Yang, L.P. (1998). Nonparametric smoothing estimates of time-varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Biometrika, 85(4), 809–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hough, J., & Fainsod, M. (1979). How the Soviet Union is governed. Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hough, J. (1990). The logic of collective action and the pattern of revolutionary behavior. Journal of Soviet Nationalities, 1(2), 34–65.Google Scholar
  22. Lazarev, V., & Gregory, P. (2002). The wheels of a command economy: allocating Soviet vehicles. Economic History Review, 15(2), 342–348.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarev, V., & Gregory, P. (2003). Commissars and cars: a case in the political economy of dictatorship. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazarev, V. (2004). Promotion contracts in a hierarchy and stability of a non-democratic regime. Yale University, Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper Series, 882.Google Scholar
  25. Lazarev, V. (2005). Economics of one-party state: promotion contracts and support for the Soviet regime. Comparative Economic Studies, 47(2), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, H.Y. (1991). From revolutionary cadres to party technocrats in socialist China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lewin, M., & Elliot, G. (2005). The Soviet century. London: New York: VersoGoogle Scholar
  28. McGuire, M., & Olson, M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: the invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 72–96.Google Scholar
  29. Popov, V. (2006, January). Life cycle of the centrally planned economy: why Soviet growth rates peaked in the 1950s. Paper Presented at the ASSA annual meetings, ACES panel, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. Schnytzer, A., & Sustersic, J. (1998). Why join the party in a one-party system? Popularity versus political exchange. Public Choice, 94, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taubman, W. (2003). Khrushchev: the man and his era. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Voslenskii, M.S. (1984). Nomenklatura: the Soviet ruling Class. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HoustonHoustonU.S.A

Personalised recommendations