Abstract
Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between the closeness of an election, the size of the electorate and voter turnout. It is often claimed that this relationship supports the rational voter hypothesis, with closeness and size proxying for the decisiveness of a vote. We offer a different interpretation. Larger communities are more heterogeneous than smaller ones, and turnouts are inversely related to the heterogeneity of a community. We present empirical support for this hypothesis using data for voter turnouts in Norwegian school language referendums. Community size is found to have a negative effect on voter turnouts, even after accounting for the probability of a single vote being decisive and the linguistic dimension of this heterogeneity. Our findings question the adequacy of the turnout regression in testing the rational voter hypothesis, as neither a positive correlation between closeness and turnout, nor a negative correlation between size and turnout can be exclusively attributed to instrumental voting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich, J.H. (1995). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, J.H. (1997). When is it rational to vote? In D.C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice, 373–390. Cambridge University Press.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243–1284.
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847–904.
Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N., & Nagaraja, H.N. (1992). A first course in order statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote? The merits and limits of rational choice theory. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Brennan, H.G., & Hamlin, A. (2000). Democratic devices and desires. Cambridge University Press.
Brennan, H.G., & Lomasky, L.E. (1997). Democracy and decision. Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J.M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor Paperbacks.
Campbell, D.E. (2005). Contextual influences on participation in local and school governance. In G.H. William (Ed.), Besieged: school boards and the future of education politics. Brookings Institution Press.
Costa, D.L., & Kahn, M.E. (2003a). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: an economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 103–111. Working paper, Harvard University.
Costa, D.L., & Kahn, M.E. (2003b). Cowards and heroes: group loyalty in the American civil war. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 519–548.
Dowding, K. (2005). Is it rational to vote? Five types of answer and a suggestion. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 442–459.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row, New York.
Edlin, A., Gelman, A., & Kaplan, N. (2005). Voting as a rational choice: the effect of preferences regarding the well-being of others. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Fiorina, M.P. (1976). The voting decision: instrumental and expressive aspects. Journal of Politics, 38, 390–413.
Goodin, R.E., & Roberts, K.W.S. (1975). The ethical voter. American Political Science Review, 69, 926–928.
Grofman, B. (1993). Is turnout the paradox that ate rational choice theory? In B. Grofman (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice, 93–103. University of Michigan Press.
Gumbel, E.J. (1958). Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press.
Kafoglis, M.Z., & Cebula, R.J. (1981). The Buchanan-Tullock model: some extensions. Public Choice, 36, 179–186.
Kirchgässner, G., & Schimmelpfennig, J. (1992). Closeness counts if it matters for electoral victory: some empirical results for the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany. Public Choice, 73, 283–299.
Kirchgässner, G., & Schulz, T. (2005). Expected closeness or mobilisation: why do voters go to the polls? Empirical results for Switzerland, 1981–1999. Working paper, University of St. Gallen.
Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge University Press.
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G.W. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 30–50.
La Ferrara, E. (2002). Inequality and group participation: theory and evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 235–273.
Leadbetter, M.R., Lindgren, G., & Rootzén, H. (1983). Extremes and related properties of random sequences and processes. Springer.
Lindert, P.H. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History, 33, 1–34.
Luttmer, E.F.P. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 500–528.
Matsusaka, J.G., & Palda, F. (1993). The Downsian voter meets the ecological fallacy. Public Choice, 77, 855–878.
Matsusaka, J.G., & Palda, F. (1999). Voter turnout: how much can we explain? Public Choice, 98, 431–446.
Miguel, E., & Gugerty, M.K. (2005, forthcoming). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics.
Mueller, D.C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press.
Oberholzer-Gee, F., & Waldfogel, J. (2005). Strength in numbers: group size and political mobilization. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 73–92.
Oliver, J.E. (2001). Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton University Press.
Owen, G., & Grofman, B. (1984). To vote or not to vote: the paradox of nonvoting. Public Choice, 42, 311–325.
Poterba, J.M. (1997). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 48–66.
Rallings, C., Temple, M., & Trasher, M. (1994). Community identity and participation in local democracy. The Commission for Local Democracy, Research Report No. 1, London.
Riker, W.H., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42.
Rose, L.E. (2002). Municipal size and local non-electoral participation: findings from Denmark, the Netherlands and Norway. Government and Policy, 20, 829–851.
Rosenstone, S.J., & Hansen, J.M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. MacMillan.
Rubenson, D. (2004). Community heterogeneity and political participation in American cities. Working paper, London School of Economics.
Schachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. American Economic Review, 89, 525–549.
Schuessler, A.A. (2000). A logic of expressive choice. Princeton University Press.
Søberg, M., & Tangerås, T.P. (2004). Rational voter turnout. Evidence from 232 Norwegian referendums. Working paper, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Stockholm.
Tullock, G. (1967). Towards a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Codes D70, D72, C16
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaniovski, S., Mueller, D.C. Community size, heterogeneity and voter turnouts. Public Choice 129, 399–415 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9063-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9063-7