Public Choice

, Volume 127, Issue 3–4, pp 251–265 | Cite as

An economic analysis of voting in Sweden

  • Henrik Jordahl


Using data from the Swedish Election Studies between 1985 and 1994 supplemented with time series on inflation and unemployment, I compare the impact of macro- and microeconomic variables on the individual vote. The principal finding is that macroeconomic variables influence the vote a bit more than microeconomic variables do. In consequence, both self-interest and public interest appear to be important explanations of economic voting in Sweden. Macroeconomic variables have, however, been much more influential in determining election outcomes. Since previous studies of economic voting have used cross-sectional data only, it is also worth noting that panel estimates indicate a much greater impact of macroeconomic variables on the individual vote than cross-sectional estimates do.


Panel Data Public Choice Macroeconomic Variable Left Wing Individual Vote 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alesina, A. & Spear, S. (1988). An overlapping generations model of electoral competition. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. (1997). Political Cycles and the Macro Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. (1995). Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C., Mendes, S., & Tverdova, Y. (2004). Endogenous economic voting: Evidence from the 1997 British election. Electoral Studies, 23, 683–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arulampalam, W., Booth, A., & Taylor, M. (2000). Unemployment persistence. Oxford Economic Papers, 52, 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro, R. (1973). The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice, 14, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, O. & Summers, L. (1986). Hysteresis and the European unemployment problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15–78.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsen, F. (2000). Unemployment, inflation and government popularity – are there partisan effects? Electoral Studies, 19, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cukierman, A. & Meltzer, A. (1986). A positive theory of discretionary policy, the cost of democratic government, and the benefits of a constitution. Economic Inquiry, 24, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorussen, H. & Taylor, M. (2002). Group economic voting: A comparison of the Netherlands and Germany, in: Dorussen H. & Taylor M. (eds), Economic Voting, London: Routledge (pp. 92–120).Google Scholar
  12. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Duch, R., Palmer, H., & Anderson, C. (2000). Heterogeneity in perceptions of national economic conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, B. (1979). Politometrics of government behavior in a democracy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuhrer, J. & Moore, G. (1995). Inflation persistence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodhart, C. & Bhansali, R. (1970). Political economy. Political Studies, 18, 43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington, J. (1992). The role of party reputation in the formation of policy. Journal of Public Economics 49, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hibbs, D. and Madsen, H. (1981). The impact of economic performance on electoral support in Sweden, 1967–1978. Scandinavian Political Studies, 4, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmberg, S. (1984). Väljare i förändring. Liber, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  22. Jackman, R., Layard, R., & Nickell, S. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Johansson, E. (2002). Intergovernmental grants as a tactical instrument: Empirical evidence from Swedish municipalities. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 883–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonung, L. & Wadensjö, E. (1979). The effect of unemployment, inflation and real income growth on government popularity in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, 349–353.Google Scholar
  25. Kinder, D. & Kiewiet, R. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinder, D. & Kiewiet, R. (1981). Sociotropic politics. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 129–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kramer, G. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review, 65, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laver, M. & Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lewin, L. (1991). Self-Interest and Public Interest in Western Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis-Beck, M. (1988). Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis-Beck, M. & Paldam, M. (2000). Economic voting: An introduction. Electoral Studies, 19, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis-Beck, M. & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindbeck, A. (1976). Stabilization policy in open economies with endogenous politicians. American Economic Review, 66, 1–19.Google Scholar
  34. Madsen, H. (1980). Electoral outcomes and macro-economic policies: The Scandinavian cases. in: Whiteley P. (ed), Models of Political Economy. London and Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Markus, G. (1988). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on the presidential vote: A pooled cross-sectional analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Markus, G. (1992). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on presidential voting: 1956–1988. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mueller, J. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 64, 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nadeau, R. A. & Lewis-Beck, M. (2001). National economic voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 63, 159–181.Google Scholar
  39. Nannestad, P. & Paldam, M. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice, 79, 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nannestad, P. & Paldam, M. (1995). It’s the government’s fault a cross-section study of economic voting in Denmark, 1990/3. European Journal of Political Research, 28, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nannestad, P. & Paldam, M. (1997a). From the pocketbook of the welfare man: A pooled cross-section study of economic voting in Denmark 1986–1992. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nannestad, P. & Paldam, M. (1997b). The Grievance asymmetry revisited: a micro study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986–1992. European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paldam, M. (1997). Political business sycles. in: Mueller, D. (ed.), Perspectives on public choice: a handbook. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (1990). Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. London: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Pettersson Lidbom, P. (2001). An empirical investigation of the strategic use of debt. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 570–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.Google Scholar
  47. Rogoff, K. & Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanders, D. (2000). The real economy and the perceived economy: How much do voters need to know? A study of British data, 1974–1997. Electoral Studies, 19, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Åkerman, J. (1946). Ekonomiskt Skeende Och Politiska Förändringar. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
  50. Åkerman, J. (1947). Political economic cycles. Kyklos, 1, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Ratio InstituteSweden

Personalised recommendations