Abstract
Most studies of committee agency in theU.S. House of Representatives consider theideological location of the committee’smedian with respect to some agent. Littlestudied, however, is the effect committeeagency may have on legislators seekingcommittee assignments. I show that whencommittees are agents to the party,legislators feel pressure to selectideological positions more proximate to theparty. They respond to this pressure byexhibiting voting behavior more similar tothe preferences of the party median. Committee assignments, then, are a means bywhich parties can influence the votingbehavior of their members.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, E.S. and Lapinski, J.S. (1997). Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science 41: 895–918.
Aldrich, J.A. and Rohde, D.W. (1995). Theories of the party in the legislature and the transition to Republican rule in the House. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Aldrich, J.A. and Rohde, D.W. (1998). Measuring conditional party government. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association.
Aldrich, J.H. and Rohde, D.W. (2001). The logic of conditional party government: Revisiting the electoral connection. In L.C. Dodd and B.I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered, seventh edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Alexander, D.S. (1916). History and procedure of the House of Representatives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. (1989). Electoral accountability and incumbency. In P.C. Ordeshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brady, D. and Bullock, C. (1980). Is there a conservative coalition in the House? Journal of Politics 42: 549–559.
Brady, D., Cooper, J. and Hurley, P. (1979). The decline of party voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–407.
Bullock, C.S., III. (1972). Freshman committee assignments and re-election in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 66: 996–1007.
Bullock, C.S., III (1973). Committee transfers in the United States House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 35: 85–120.
Bullock, C.S., III and Sprague, J. (1969). A research note on the committee reassignments of southern democratic congressmen. Journal of Politics 31: 493–512.
Cooper, J. and Brady, D.W. (1981). Institutional context and leadership style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn. American Political Science Review 75: 411–425.
Cox, G. and McCubbins, M.D. (1994). Bonding, structure, and the stability of political parties: Party government in the House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 215–231.
Cox, G. and McCubbins, M.D. (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cox, G.W. and McCubbins, M.D. (1991). On the decline of party voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 547–570.
Davidson, R.H. (1981). Subcommittee government: New channels for policymaking. In T.E. Mann and N. Ornstein (Eds.), The new Congress. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Deering, C.J. and Smith, S.S. (1997). Committees in Congress, 3rd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Dion, D. (1997). Turning the legislative thumbscrew: Minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Galloway, G.B. (1976). The history of the House of Representatives, 2nd edition. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company.
Gilligan, T. and Krehbiel, K. (1987). Collective decision-making and standing committees: An informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 287–335.
Gilligan, T. and Krehbiel, K. (1989). Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science 33: 459–490.
Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric analysis, 4th edition. New York: MacMillian.
Groseclose, T. and Stewart, C., III. (1998). The value of committee seats in the House, 1947–91. American Journal of Political Science 42: 453–474.
Hall, R.L. and Grofman, B. (1990). The committee assignment process and the conditional nature of committee bias. American Political Science Review 84: 1149–1166.
Jones, C.O. (1968). Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An essay on the limits of leadership in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 30: 617–646.
Kiewiet, D.R. and McCubbins, M.D. 1991. The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krehbiel, K. (1991). Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where’s the party? British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–266.
Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maltzman, F. (1997). Competing principles: Committees, parties, and the organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McCarty, N., Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Income redistribution and the realignment of American politics. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
Morton, R.B. (1999). Methods and models: A guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Munger, M. (1988). Allocation of desirable committee assignments: Extended queues versus committee expansion. American Journal of Political Science 32: 317–344.
Polsby, N.W., Gallagher, M. and Rundquist, B. (1969). The growth of seniority in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 63: 787–807.
Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–278.
Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. Journal of Politics 46: 1061–1079.
Rohde, D.W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform house. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rohde, D.W. (1994). Parties and committees in the House: Member motivations, issues, and institutional arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 341–359.
Schickler, E. and Rich, A. (1997). Controlling the floor: Parties as procedural coalitions in the House. American Journal of Political Science 41: 1340–1375.
Schickler, E. (2000). Institutional change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998. American Political Science Review 94: 269–288.
Sinclair, B. (1978). From party voting to regional fragmentation: The House of Representatives, (1933–1956). American Politics Quarterly 6: 125–147.
Sinclair, B. (1995). Legislators, leaders, and lawmaking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanthak, K. Exclusive Committee Assignments and Party Pressure in the U.S. House of Representatives. Public Choice 121, 391–412 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1685-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1685-z