Skip to main content
Log in

Exclusive Committee Assignments and Party Pressure in the U.S. House of Representatives

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies of committee agency in theU.S. House of Representatives consider theideological location of the committee’smedian with respect to some agent. Littlestudied, however, is the effect committeeagency may have on legislators seekingcommittee assignments. I show that whencommittees are agents to the party,legislators feel pressure to selectideological positions more proximate to theparty. They respond to this pressure byexhibiting voting behavior more similar tothe preferences of the party median. Committee assignments, then, are a means bywhich parties can influence the votingbehavior of their members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, E.S. and Lapinski, J.S. (1997). Demand-side theory and congressional committee composition: A constituency characteristics approach. American Journal of Political Science 41: 895–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J.A. and Rohde, D.W. (1995). Theories of the party in the legislature and the transition to Republican rule in the House. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Aldrich, J.A. and Rohde, D.W. (1998). Measuring conditional party government. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association.

  • Aldrich, J.H. and Rohde, D.W. (2001). The logic of conditional party government: Revisiting the electoral connection. In L.C. Dodd and B.I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered, seventh edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D.S. (1916). History and procedure of the House of Representatives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. (1989). Electoral accountability and incumbency. In P.C. Ordeshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. and Bullock, C. (1980). Is there a conservative coalition in the House? Journal of Politics 42: 549–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D., Cooper, J. and Hurley, P. (1979). The decline of party voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C.S., III. (1972). Freshman committee assignments and re-election in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 66: 996–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C.S., III (1973). Committee transfers in the United States House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 35: 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C.S., III and Sprague, J. (1969). A research note on the committee reassignments of southern democratic congressmen. Journal of Politics 31: 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. and Brady, D.W. (1981). Institutional context and leadership style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn. American Political Science Review 75: 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. and McCubbins, M.D. (1994). Bonding, structure, and the stability of political parties: Party government in the House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. and McCubbins, M.D. (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W. and McCubbins, M.D. (1991). On the decline of party voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 547–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R.H. (1981). Subcommittee government: New channels for policymaking. In T.E. Mann and N. Ornstein (Eds.), The new Congress. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deering, C.J. and Smith, S.S. (1997). Committees in Congress, 3rd edition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, D. (1997). Turning the legislative thumbscrew: Minority rights and procedural change in legislative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, G.B. (1976). The history of the House of Representatives, 2nd edition. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, T. and Krehbiel, K. (1987). Collective decision-making and standing committees: An informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 287–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, T. and Krehbiel, K. (1989). Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science 33: 459–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric analysis, 4th edition. New York: MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groseclose, T. and Stewart, C., III. (1998). The value of committee seats in the House, 1947–91. American Journal of Political Science 42: 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.L. and Grofman, B. (1990). The committee assignment process and the conditional nature of committee bias. American Political Science Review 84: 1149–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.O. (1968). Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An essay on the limits of leadership in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 30: 617–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D.R. and McCubbins, M.D. 1991. The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1991). Information and legislative organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where’s the party? British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, F. (1997). Competing principles: Committees, parties, and the organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Income redistribution and the realignment of American politics. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R.B. (1999). Methods and models: A guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, M. (1988). Allocation of desirable committee assignments: Extended queues versus committee expansion. American Journal of Political Science 32: 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N.W., Gallagher, M. and Rundquist, B. (1969). The growth of seniority in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 63: 787–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1984). The polarization of American politics. Journal of Politics 46: 1061–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, D.W. (1991). Parties and leaders in the postreform house. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, D.W. (1994). Parties and committees in the House: Member motivations, issues, and institutional arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickler, E. and Rich, A. (1997). Controlling the floor: Parties as procedural coalitions in the House. American Journal of Political Science 41: 1340–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickler, E. (2000). Institutional change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998. American Political Science Review 94: 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, B. (1978). From party voting to regional fragmentation: The House of Representatives, (1933–1956). American Politics Quarterly 6: 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, B. (1995). Legislators, leaders, and lawmaking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanthak, K. Exclusive Committee Assignments and Party Pressure in the U.S. House of Representatives. Public Choice 121, 391–412 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1685-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-004-1685-z

Keywords

Navigation