Advertisement

Listening to the Patient Perspective: Psychiatric Inpatients’ Attitudes Towards Physical Restraint

  • Yaniv Spinzy
  • Saed Maree
  • Aviv Segev
  • Gadi Cohen-Rappaport
Original Paper
  • 213 Downloads

Abstract

When other options fail, physical restraint is used in inpatient psychiatric units as a means to control violent behavior of agitated inpatients and to prevent them from harm. The professional and social discourse regarding the use of restrictive measures and the absence of the inpatients’ attitudes towards these measures is notable. Our research therefore tries to fill this gap by interviewing inpatients about these issues. To assess the subjective experience and attitudes of inpatients who have undergone physical restraint. Forty inpatients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders were interviewed by way of a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were conducted via use of SPSS statistical software. 1.Inpatients reported that physical restraint evoked an experience of loneliness (77.5%) and loss of autonomy (82.5%). 2.Staff visits during times of physical restraint were reported as beneficial according to 73.6% of the inpatients interviewed. 3.Two thirds of the inpatients viewed the use of physical restraints as justified when an inpatient was dangerous. 4.Two thirds of the inpatients regarded physical restraint as the most aversive experience of their hospitalization. Our pilot study explored the subjective experience and attitudes of psychiatric inpatients towards the use of physical restraint. Inpatients viewed physical restraint as a practice that was sometimes justified but at the same time evoked negative subjective feelings. We conclude that listening to inpatients’ perspectives can help caregivers to evaluate these measures.

Keywords

Patient perspective Physical restraint Psychosis Closed door unit 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Yaniv Spinzy declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Mr. Saed Maree (saedma@clalit.org.il) declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Dr. Aviv Segev (aviv@segev.name) declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Dr. Gadi Cohen-Rappaport (gadicr@gmail.com) declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. Seclusion and restraint: the psychiatric uses. Task Force Report 22. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huf G, Coutinho E, Adams C. Physical restraints versus seclusion room for management of people with acute aggression or agitation due to psychotic illness (TREC-SAVE): a randomized trial. Psychol Med. 2012;42(11):2265–73.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712000372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Owen C, Tarantello C, Jones M, Tennnant C. Violence and aggression in psychiatric units. Psychiatr Serv. 1998;49:1452–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tardiff K. The current state of psychiatry in the treatment of violent patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(6):493–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chow E, Desai H, Bury AS, Roy R, Bassett AS, Collins EJ. The effects of clozapine on aggression: a randomized controlled study. 149th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; May 4–9, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whittington R. An evaluation of staff training in psychological techniques for the management of patient aggression. J Clin Nurs. 1996;5(4):257–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gutheil TG. Legal issues in psychiatry. In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, editors. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. Sixth. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 2747–66.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisher WA. Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. Am J Psychiatr. 1994;151(11):1584–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerlock A, Solomon HC. Factors associated with the seclusion of psychiatric patients. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 1983;21(2):46–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nijman HL, Merckelbach HL, Allertz WF, a Campo JM. Prevention of aggressive incidents on a closed psychiatric ward. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(5):694–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mason T. Seclusion theory reviewed - a benevolent or malevolent intervention? Med Sci Law. 1993;33(2):95–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sailas EES, Fenton M. Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1:CD001163.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001163.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Way BB, Banks SM. Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990;41(1):75–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown JS, Tooke SK. On the seclusion of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(5):711–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aschen SR. Restraints: does position make a difference? Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1995;16(1):87–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holmes D, Kennedy SL, Perron A. The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient’s perspective. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004;25(6):559–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meehan T, Vermeer C, Windsor C. Patient’s perception of seclusion: a qualitative investigation. Adv Nurse. 2000;31:370–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Happell B, Harrow A. Nurses’ attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010;19:162–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication April/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaniv Spinzy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saed Maree
    • 1
  • Aviv Segev
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gadi Cohen-Rappaport
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Shalvata Mental Health CenterHod HasharonIsrael
  2. 2.Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Beer Yaakov-Ness Ziona Mental Health CenterBeer YaakovIsrael

Personalised recommendations