Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

The New York State Collaborative Care Initiative: 2012–2014

  • Lloyd I. Sederer
  • Marisa Derman
  • Jay Carruthers
  • Melanie Wall
Original Paper


We report on a partnership between the NYS Department of Health and Office of Mental Health that delivered the full integration of depression care into primary medical care. Called the NYS Collaborative Care Initiative (NYS-CCI), nineteen NYS academic medical centers participated. Based on principles of chronic illness care, Collaborative Care detects and manages depression in primary care using a highly prescriptive protocol (University of Washington AIMS Center website: Fidelity was ensured by measuring screening rates, diagnosis, enrollment, and improvement among those in treatment for 16 weeks. There was significant, progressive performance improvement in sites that served over 1 million patients over the course of the two and a half year grant. Clinics also reported satisfaction with the CC model. Based on the experience gained, we recommend a number of critical actions necessary for the successful implementation and scaling-up of CC throughout any state undertaking this endeavor.


Mental health Primary care Integration of services Collaborative Care Depression Measurement based care Graduate medical education 


Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Unutzer J, Harbin H, Schoenbaum M, Druss B: Canter for Health Care Strategies and Mathematical Policy research for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Collaborative care model: an approach for integrating physical and mental health care in Medicaid health homes.
  2. 2.
    Sederer LI: What does it take for primary care practices to truly deliver behavioral health care? JAMA Psychiatry 71(5):485–486, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thota AB, Sipe TA, Byard GJ, et al.: Community Preventive Services Task Force: Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 42(5): 525–538, 2012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J et al. Collaborative care for depression: A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Archives of Internal Medicine 166:2314–2321, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katon WJ, Lin EHB, Von Korff M et al.: Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. New England Journal of Medicine 363:2611–2620, 2010.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Unutzer J, Katon WJ, Fan MY et al. Long term cost effects of collaborative care for late life depression. American Journal of Managed Care 14(2):95–100, 2008.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hospital-Medical Home (H-MH) Demonstration. New York State Department of Health website.
  8. 8.
    Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, et al. Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. Annals of Family Medicine 8(4):348–353, 2010.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd I. Sederer
    • 1
  • Marisa Derman
    • 1
  • Jay Carruthers
    • 1
  • Melanie Wall
    • 1
  1. 1.The New York State Office of Mental HealthNYS Psychiatric Institute and Columbia Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations