Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 381–393 | Cite as

Nonshared Environmental Effects on Adulthood Psychopathic Personality Traits: Results from a Monozygotic Twin Difference Scores Analysis

  • Kevin M. Beaver
  • Michael G. Vaughn
  • Matt DeLisi
Original Paper

Abstract

An emerging body of empirical research has revealed that nonshared environmental factors are associated with explaining variance in measures of psychopathy and psychopathic personality traits. The current study adds to this existing knowledge base by analyzing a measure of psychopathy derived, in part, from the five factor model in a sample of monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The results of the MZ twin difference scores analysis revealed that nonshared environmental factors found within the family were unrelated to between-twin differences in psychopathic personality traits. Only one nonshared factor—levels of self-control—consistently predicted psychopathy. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings and the limitations of our study.

Keywords

Monozygotic twins Nonshared environment Psychopathic personality traits 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris, and funded by a grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 17 other agencies. Special acknowledgment is due to Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Persons interested in obtaining data files from Add Health should contact Add Health, Carolina Population Center, 123 W. Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-2524 (addhealth@unc.edu). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Asbury K, Dunn JF, Pike A, Plomin R: Nonshared environmental influences on individual differences in early behavioral development: A monozygotic twin differences study. Child Development 74:933–943, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beaver KM: Nonshared environmental influences on adolescent delinquent involvement and adult criminal behavior. Criminology 46:341–369, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beaver KM, DeLisi M, Mears DP, Stewart EA: Low self-control and contact with the criminal justice system in a nationally representative sample of males. Justice Quarterly 26:695–715, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beaver KM, Barnes JC, May JS, Schwartz JA: Psychopathic personality traits, genetic risk, and gene–environment correlations. Criminal Justice and Behavior 38:896–912, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellair PE, Roscigno VJ, McNulty TJ: Linking local labor market opportunity to violent adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40:6–33, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blonigen DM, Hicks BM, Krueger RF, Patrick CJ, Iacono WG: Psychopathic personality traits: Heritability and genetic overlap with internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Psychological Medicine 35:637–648, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burt SA, McGue M, Iacono WG, Krueger RF: Differential parent–child relationships and adolescent externalizing symptoms: Cross-lagged analyses within a monozygotic twin differences design. Developmental Psychology 42:1289–1298, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Morgan J, Rutter M, Taylor A, Arseneault L, Tully L, Jacobs C, Kim-Cohen J, Polo-Thomas M: Maternal expressed emotion predicts children’s antisocial behavior problems: Using monozygotic-twin differences to identify environmental effects on behavioral development. Developmental Psychology 40:149–161, 2004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cleckley H: The Mask of Sanity. Saint Louis, Mosby, 1941Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crosnoe R, Elder GH: Adolescent twins and emotional distress: The interrelated influence of nonshared environment and social structure. Child Development 73:1761–1774, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crosnoe R, Elder GH: Family dynamics, supportive relationships, and educational resilience during adolescence. Journal of Family Issues 25:571–602, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Amato RC, Gray JW, Dean RS: Construct validity of the PPVT with neuropsychological, intellectual, and achievement measures. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44:934–939, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deater-Deckard K, Pike A, Petrill SA, Cutting AL, Hughes C, O’Connor TG: Nonshared environmental processes in social-emotional development: An observational study of identical twin differences in the preschool period. Developmental Science 4:F1–F6, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeLisi M: Psychopathy is the unified theory of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 7:256–273, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Derefinko KJ, Lynam DR: Using the FFM to conceptualize psychopathy: A test using a drug abusing sample. Journal of Personality Disorders 21:638–656, 2007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dunn LM, Dunn LM: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pine, American Guidance Service, 1981Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T: A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gudonis LC, Miller DJ, Miller JD, Lynam DR: Conceptualizing personality disorders from a general model of personality functioning: Antisocial personality disorder and the Five-Factor Model. Personality and Mental Health 2:249–264, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hare RD: Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior 23:25–54, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hare RD, Neumann CS: Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4:217–246, 2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harris JR: The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York, The Free Press, 1998Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harris KM, Florey F, Tabor J, Bearman PS, Jones J, Udry JR: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design. Accessed 21 Sep 2012
  24. 24.
    Harris KM, Halpern CT, Smolen A, Haberstick BC: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) twin data. Twin Research and Human Genetics 9:988–997, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haynie DL, Piquero AR: Pubertal development and victimization risk: Differences across gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 43:3–35, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirschi T: Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1969Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jacobson K, Rowe DC: Genetic and shared environment influences on adolescent BMI: Interaction with race and sex. Behavior Genetics 28:265–278, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jacobson K, Rowe DC: Genetics and environmental influences on the relationship between family connectedness, school connectedness and adolescent depressed mood: Sex differences. Developmental Psychology 35:926–939, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kendler KS, Gardner CO: Monozygotic twins discordant for major depression: A preliminary exploration of the role of environmental experiences in the aetiology and course of illness. Psychological Medicine 31:411–423, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Larsson H, Andershed H, Lichtenstein P: A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115:221–230, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M: Family Factors as Correlates and Predictors of Juvenile Conduct Problems and Delinquency. In: Tonry MH, Morris N (Eds) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 7. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lynam DR: Psychopathy from the Perspective of the Five Factor Model. In: Costa PT, Widiger TA (Eds) Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality, 2nd edn. Washington, American Psychological Association, pp. 325–350, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lynam DR, Derefinko KJ: Psychopathy and Personality. In: Patrick CJ (Ed) Handbook of Psychopathy. New York, Guilford, pp. 133–155, 2006Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lynam DR, Widiger T: Using the five factor model to represent the personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110:401–412, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lynam DR, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Raine A, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M: Adolescent psychopathy and the Big Five: Results from two Samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 33:431–43, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miller JD, Lynam DR: Psychopathy and the five factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment 81:168–178, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller JD, Lynam DR, Widiger T, Leukefeld C: Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the five factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality 69:253–276, 2001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pike A, Reiss D, Hetherington EM, Plomin R: Using MZ differences in the search for nonshared environmental effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 37:695–704, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn G, McGuffin P: Behavioral Genetics, 5th edn. New York, Worth Publishers, 2008Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pratt TC, Cullen FT: The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology 38:931–964, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, Tabor J, Beuhring T, Sieving RE, Shew M, Ireland M, Bearinger LH, Udry JR: Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association 278:823–832, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rovine MJ: Estimating Nonshared Environment Using Sibling Discrepancy Scores. In: Mavis Hetherington E, Reiss D, Plomin R (Eds) Separate Social Worlds of Siblings: The Impact of the Nonshared Environment on Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 33–61, 1994Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sampson RJ, Laub JH: Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1993Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schreck CJ, Fisher BS, Miller JM: The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly 21:23–47, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor J, Loney BR, Bobadilla L, Iacono WG, McGue M: Genetic and environmental influences on psychopathy trait dimensions in a community sample of male twins. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 31:633–645, 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tibbetts SG, Piquero AR: The influence of gender, low birth weight, and disadvantaged environment in predicting early onset of offending: A test of Moffitt’s interactional hypothesis. Criminology 37:843–878, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vaughn MG, DeLisi M: Were Wolfgang’s chronic offenders psychopaths? On the convergent validity between psychopathy and career criminality. Journal of Criminal Justice 36:33–42, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vaughn MG, DeLisi M, Beaver KM, Wright JP, Howard MO: Toward a psychopathology of self-control theory: The importance of narcissistic traits. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 25:803–821, 2007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vernon PA, Villani VC, Vickers LC, Harris JA: A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences 44:445–452, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Viding E, Blair RJR, Moffitt TE, Plomin R: Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46:592–597, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Viding E, Fontaine NMG, Oliver MR, Plomin R: Negative parental discipline, conduct problems and callous–unemotional traits: Monozygotic twin differences study. British Journal of Psychiatry 195:414–419, 2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Waldman ID, Rhee SH: Genetic and Environmental Influences on Psychopathy and Antisocial Behavior. In: Patrick CJ (Ed) Handbook of Psychopathy. New York, Guilford, pp. 205–228, 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin M. Beaver
    • 1
  • Michael G. Vaughn
    • 2
  • Matt DeLisi
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Criminology and Criminal JusticeFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Division of Epidemiology, School of Social Work, School of Public HealthSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations