Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 111–125 | Cite as

Inpatients’ and Providers’ Experiences with User Involvement in Inpatient Care

  • Marianne Storm
  • Larry Davidson
Original Paper


A qualitative study of inpatients’ perspectives on what it means to be involved in their own care, and providers’ experiences with encouraging user involvement in care planning and service provision is reported. Twenty semi-structured interviews with inpatients, fourteen log reports from providers and sixteen sets of written minutes from staff meetings constitute the study data. Differences were found between inpatient and provider perspectives. Inpatients reported few opportunities to have meaningful input in the decision-making regarding their care, while providers reported difficulty engaging inpatients into discussions or care planning. Although participants described providers as nice, understanding and supportive, these qualities did not always translate into their feeling seen and heard as unique individuals. When experiencing difficulty in engaging inpatients in existing forms of treatment, providers reported being aware of few options for them to try in increasing user involvement. Such different perspectives will need to be addressed in future efforts to increase service user involvement in inpatient care.


User involvement Mental health services Qualitative data analysis Inpatients Service providers 



The authors would like to thank all of the study participants in the community mental health centers for engaging in the research project calling attention to service user involvement, also providing data to this paper. We thank Marit Steen for her efforts in facilitating the staff meetings. We also express thanks to Professor Kjell Hausken & Professor Knud Knudsen at the University of Stavanger and John Strauss at Yale University for their comments on the early drafts of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Norwegian Patient Rights Act: Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services: Openness and Wholeness: Mental Health Problems and Service Provision. St meld 25 (1996–1997). Oslo, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHO: Mental health: Facing the challenges, Building solutions. Copenhagen, World Health Organization Regional office for Europe, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission: Green paper. Improving the mental health of the population. Towards a strategy on mental health for the European Union. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storm M, Hausken K: Service user involvement in community mental health centers: service providers’ perspectives. Manuscript in review, 2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Storm M, Hausken K, Mikkelsen A: User involvement in in-patient mental health services: operationalization, empirical testing, and validation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2010, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richter J, Halliday S, Gromer LI, et al.: User and carer involvement in child and adolescent mental health services: a Norwegian staff perspective. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 36(4):265–277, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chinman M, Young AS, Hassell J, et al.: Toward the implementation of mental health consumer provider services. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 33(2):176–195, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anthony P, Crawford P: Service user involvement in care planning: the mental health nurse’s perspective. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 7(5):425–434, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinsbekk A, Solbjør M: Brukermedvirkning i sykehusavdelinger? Tidsskrift Norsk Lægeforening 128(17):1944–1955, 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lammers J, Happell B: Consumer participation in mental health services: looking from a consumer perspective. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 10(4):385–392, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hickey G, Kipping C: Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing 7(1):83–88, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson AGH: The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine 64(6):1297–1310, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen T, Hatling T, Lidal E, et al.: The user perspective: respected or rejected in mental health care? Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing 11(3):292–297, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen T, Hatling T, Lidal E, et al.: Discrepancies between patients and professionals in the assessment of patient needs: a quantitative study of Norwegian mental health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 39(6):554–562, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thornicroft G, Slade M: Comparing needs assessed by staff and by service users: Paternalism or partnership in mental health? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 11(3):186–191, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chinman M, Allende M, Weingarten R, et al.: On the road to collaborative treatment planning: Consumer and provider perspectives. The Journal of Behavioural Health Services & Research 26(2):211–218, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norwegian Directorate of Health: Distriktspsykiatriske senter—med blikket vendt mot kommunene og spesialiserte sykehusfunksjoner i ryggen. Oslo, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Storm M, Rennesund ÅB, Jensen MF: Brukermedvirkning i psykisk helsearbeid. Oslo, Gyldendal akademisk, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saksvik PØ, Forseth U (2000) Forståelse for arbeidsgruppers organisasjonskultur - en forutsetning for vellykkede intervensjoner på arbeidsplassen. Nordisk Psykologi 52(3): 217–232.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mikkelsen A, Gundersen M: The effect of a participatory organizational intervention on work environment, job stress and subjective health complaints. International Journal of Stress Management 10:91–110, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mikkelsen A, Saksvik PØ: Impact of a participatory organizational intervention on job characteristics and job stress. International Journal of Health Services 29(4):871–893, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kvale S: Det kvalitative forskningsintervju, 1st edn. Oslo, ad Notam Gyldendal AS, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hsieh H, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9):1277–1288, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davidson L, Tondora J, O’Connell MJ, et al.: Creating a recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care: Moving from concept to reality. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 31(1):23–31, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tondora J, Pocklington S, Gorges AG, et al.: Implementation of person-centered care and planning: from policy to practices to evaluation. Washington D.C.: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deegan PE, Drake RE: Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process. Psychiatric Services 57(11):1636–1639, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roe D, Hadass G, Baloush-Klienman V, et al.: Why and how people decide to stop taking prescribed psychiatric medication: exploring the subjective process of choice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 33(1):38–46, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Program for Recovery and Community Health, School of Medicine and Institution for Social and Policy StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations