Comparison of Clozapine Response for Inpatients in the Research Setting Versus Routine Clinical Practice
- 55 Downloads
This study compares patient characteristics and treatment response between inpatients treated with clozapine in a research setting as compared to those initiated on clozapine during routine inpatient treatment.
Subjects on clozapine, in clinical trials, were compared with clozapine inpatients receiving routine clinical care.
At baseline, patients in routine clinical practice had more negative symptoms (P < 0.001), activation (P < 0.001) and greater total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores (P = 0.022) than those in the research setting. Routine clinical practice subjects had larger decreases in BPRS total scores (P = 0.042) and positive item scores (P = 0.0005) compared to research subjects. Response to clozapine was observed in 15/85 (18%) research subjects as compared to 60/223 (27%) patients in routine care (P = 0.09).
Patients treated in routine clinical practice have more severe baseline symptoms, but experience significantly greater improvements in psychiatric symptoms.
KeywordsClozapine Effectiveness Treatment refractory Schizophrenia
The authors would like to thank Yang Yu, M.S. for the help with data analysis. They would also thank the members of the Treatment Research Program for their help in the research involved in this publication. This work was supported in part by the Advanced Center for Intervention and Services Research Grant (P50 MH40279, Carpenter WT Jr, PI).
Conflict of Interest and Financial Support Statement
Douglas L. Boggs: no competing interests or financial support to disclose. Deanna L. Kelly: grant support; Abbott, Astra-Zeneca; honoraria; Astra-Zeneca; Advisory Board; Solvay, Bristol-Meyers Squibb; Raymond C. Love: Speaker; Bristol-Meyers Squibb; Robert P. McMahon: no competing interests or financial support to disclose; Robert R. Conley: Advisory Board: Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Organon, Pfizer, Solvay, Wyeth.
- 1.Clinical development of atypical antipsychotics: Research design and evaluation. Collaborative working group on clinical trial evaluations. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59 Suppl 12:10–16, 1998Google Scholar
- 19.Guy W: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised (DHEW Publication No. ADM 76–338). Rockville, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1976Google Scholar