Advertisement

Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 55–67 | Cite as

Treatment of Female Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: The Role of Comfort in a Predominantly Male Environment

  • Alan Fontana
  • Robert Rosenheck
Article

Abstract

This study examines the role of women's comfort in coming for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in a predominantly male environment. Consecutive admissions (N = 224) to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)'s Women's Stress Disorder Treatment Teams were enrolled in an outcome study from July 1998 through June 2000. Women reported that they were somewhat comfortable in coming to the VA for their mental health care. For women who had no prior experience with the VA, comfort increased with their exposure to the treatment program. Further, for this group of women, comfort level was related significantly to their commitment to working in therapy and the regularity of their attendance in treatment over time. There were no significant changes in comfort level for women who had prior contact with the VA. Comfort level was unrelated to satisfaction and only minimally related to clinical outcomes. The primary role of women's comfort level, therefore, appeared to be as a facilitator of their participation in the therapeutic process.

Key Words

posttraumatic stress disorder treatment women veterans comfort 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Personnel and Readiness: Population Representation in the Military Services: Fiscal Year 2001, Washington DC, Department of Defense, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenberg G, Rosenheck R: Department of Veterans Affairs National Mental Health Program Performance Monitoring System: Fiscal Year 2002 Report, West Haven, Connecticut, Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoff RA, Rosenheck RA: Utilization of mental health services by women in a male dominated environment: the VA experience. Psychiatric Services 48:1408–1414, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoff RA, Rosenheck RA: Female veterans use of VA health care services. Medical Care 36:1114–1119, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenheck RA, Greenberg, G: National Mental Health Program Performance Monitoring System: Fiscal Year 2001 Report, West Haven, Connecticut, Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Francke LB: Ground Zero: The Gender Wars in the Military, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontana A, Rosenheck R: Women under Stress: Evaluation of the Womenapos;s Stress Disorder Treatment Teams, West Haven, Connecticut, Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fontana A, Rosenheck R: Improving the Efficiency of Resource Utilization in Outpatient Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Report on Specialized PTSD Programs, West Haven, Connecticut, Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenheck R, Fontana A: Treatment of veterans severely impaired by posttraumatic stress disorder, in Emotional Aftermath of the Persian Gulf War: Veterans, Families, Communities, and Nations. Edited by Ursano RJ, Norwood AE. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolfe J, Brown PJ, Furey J, et al.: Development of a wartime stressor scale for women. Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 5:330–335, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wallston KA, Wallston BS: Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs 6:160–170, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smilkstein, G Ashworth C, Montano D: Validity and reliability of the Family APGAR as a test of family function. Journal of Family Practice 15:303–311, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horvath AO, Greenberg L: Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology 36:223–233, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neale MS, Rosenheck RA: Therapeutic alliance and outcome in a VA intensive case management program. Psychiatric Services 46:719–721, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chinman M, Rosenheck RA, Lam J: The case management relationship and outcomes for homeless people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 51:1142–1147, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Attkisson CC, Zwick R The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and correlation with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Evaluation and Program Planning 5:233–237, 1982.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fontana A, Rosenheck R: A short form of the Mississippi Scale for measuring change in combat-related PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress 7:407–414, 1994.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fontana A, Rosenheck R: Outcome Monitoring of VA Specialized Intensive PTSD Programs: Fiscal Year 1996 Report, West Haven, Connecticut, Northeast Program Evaluation Center, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola J, et al.: New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 173:412–423, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kulka RA, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA., et al.: Trauma and the Vietnam War Generation: Report of the Findings from the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study, New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lehman, AF: A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning 11:51–62, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cockburn J, Fahey P, Sanson-Fisher RW: Construction and validation of a questionnaire to measure the health beliefs of general practice patients. Family Practice 4:108–116, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, et al.: SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PTSD Evaluations, Northeast Program Evaluation Center and Research Scientist in PsychiatryYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  2. 2.Northeast Program Evaluation Center, Psychiatry and Public HealthYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  3. 3.NEPEC (182)VA Connecticut Healthcare System–West Haven CampusWest Haven

Personalised recommendations