Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disrupting power/entrenching sovereignty: The paradox of human rights education

  • Viewpoints/Controversies
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While human rights education (HRE) provides the tools for emancipation, it remains susceptible to appropriation by authoritarian regimes who seek to entrench state power. Classification scholars who typologize approaches to HRE fail to acknowledge that state entities could employ human rights discourse to reinforce state sovereignty. Consequently, this article develops the idea of HRE as sovereignty, to describe states that employ human rights language to reinforce power, and HRE as disruption, to acknowledge the existence of social justice movements that operate outside legally based human rights frameworks to challenge state power. Furthermore, the article argues that HRE as sovereignty and disruption has its genesis in the global South, primarily as a response to the universalizing mission embedded in global human rights discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. K. (2017). #RhodesMustFall: Decolonization, praxis and disruption. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 9, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. K. (2018). Bridging the ‘values gap’: Human rights education, ideology, and the global-local nexus. In M. Zembylas & A. Keet (Eds.), Critical human rights, citizenship and democracy education (pp. 173–189). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, S. C. (2015). Children’s rights: A critical geographic perspective. In W. Vandenhole, E. Desmet, D. Rynaert, & S. Lembrechts (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of children’s studies (pp. 131–146). London and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Levitt, K. (2012). Complicating the concept of culture. Comparative Education, 48(4), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnove, R. F. (2013). Introduction: Reframing comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 1–26). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. (2000). What do human rights do?An anthropological enquiry. Theory & Event, 4(4), 6–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, A. (2015). What are human rights? Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 35(1), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, M. (2011). Human rights education: Ideology, location, and approaches. Human Rights Quarterly, 33, 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, J. M. (Ed.). (2013). Human rights from a third world perspective: Critique, history and international law. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. F. (2006). Public pedagogy and educational leadership: Politically engaged scholarly communities and possibilities for critical engagement. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 3(1), 57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, P., Meyer, J., & Ramirez, F. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discoursein social studies, history, and civics textbooks, 1970–2008. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 517–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, S. (2005). Constructing rights? Human rights education and the state. International Political Science Review, 26(4), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2011). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cislaghi, B., Gillespie, D., & Mackie, G. (2017). Expanding the aspirational map: Interactive learning and human rights in Tostan’s community empowerment program. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 251–266). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the south. In J. Comaroff & J. Comaroff (Eds.), Theory from the south (pp. 1–49). London: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L. (2011). Can education interrupt fragility? Towards the resilient and adaptable state. In K. Mundy & S. Dryden-Peterson (Eds.), Educating children in conflict zones: Research, policy, and practice for systemic change (a tribute to Jackie Kirk). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentith, A. M., & Brady, J. (1999). Theories of public pedagogies as possibilities for ethical action and community resistance: A curricular notion. Paper presented at the AERA: Research on Women and Education SIG Conference, Hempstead, NY.

  • Dudai, R. (2017). Entryism, mimicry and victimhood work: The adoption of human rights discourse by right-wing groups in Israel. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(7), 866–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, N. (2004). How to define human rights education? A complex answer to a simple question. In V. B. Georgi & M. Seberich (Eds.), International perspectives in human rights education (Vol. 112, pp. 105–127). Washington, DC: Bertelsmann Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. (2012). The geography and political context of human rights education: Israel as a case study. Journal of Human Rights, 11, 384–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilker, L. M. (2011). The role of education in driving conflict and building peace: The case of Rwanda. Prospects, 41, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, T., & Martin, J. P. (2014). Human rights education and peacebuilding: A comparative study. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallad, Z. (2016). The power of the body: Analyzing the logic of law and social change in the Arab Spring. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 6(2), 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R. (2006). Human rights in the 21st century: Take a walk on the dark side. Sydney Law Review, 28(4), 665–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karrim, N., & Keet, A. (2005). Infusing human rights into the curriculum: The case of the revised South African national curriculum statement. Perspectives in Education, 23(2), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1995). The local and the global: The anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 547–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keet, A. (2010). Human rights education: A conceptual analysis. Saarbrücken: Lambert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, betrayal, critique: The renewal of human rights education. In C. Roux (Ed.), Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 7–28). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keet, A. (2014). Plasticity, critical hope and the regeneration of human rights education. In V. Bozalek, B. Leibowitz, R. Carolissen, & M. Boler (Eds.), Discerning critical hope in educational practices (pp. 69–81). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keet, A. (2015). It is time: Critical human rights education in an age of counter-hegemonic distrust. Education as Change, 19(3), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2016). Decolonizing the university: New directions. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Bromley-Martin, P., & Ramirez, F. (2010). Human rights in social science textbooks: Cross-national analyses, 1970–2008. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Boli, J., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of sociology, 103(1), 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, R., & Torres, C. (2000). The state, globalization and educational policy. In N. Burbules & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 27–56). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutua, M. W. (2001). Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal, 42(1), 201–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutua, M. W. (2004). Human rights: A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2016). #RhodesMustFall: Nibbling at resilient colonialism in South Africa. Mankon: Langaa Research and Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. P., & Nelson, S. W. (2013). The public pedagogy of student activists in Chile: What have we learned from the Penguins’ Revolution? Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(2), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, N., & Gordon, N. (2015). The human right to dominate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. G. (2015). Global civil society and education policy in post-genocide Rwanda. International Sociology, 30(6), 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. G., & Suárez, D. F. (2017). Symbol and substance: human rights education as an emergent global institution. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 19–46). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. G., & Tiplic, D. (2014). Rights-based education and conflict: A cross-national study of rights discourse in textbooks. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(3), 314–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, D., & Fraser, P. (2012). Educational opportunity and contentious politics: The 2011 Chilean student movement. Berkley Review of Education, 3(1), 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, J. (2012). Comparative education methodology in transition: Towards the study of complexity? In J. Schreiwer (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (4th ed., pp. 3–52). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, S., & Collier, J. F. (2000). Limiting indigenous autonomy in Chiapas, Mexico: The state government’s use of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 877–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (2012). Policy borrowing and lending: 2012 World yearbook of education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, D. F. (2007). Human rights and curricular policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Comparative Education Review, 51(3), 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, N. (1992). Human rights education: Alternative conceptions. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Human rights, education and global responsibilities (pp. 21–50). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbitts, F. (2002). Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbitts, F. (2017). Evolution of human rights education models. In M. Bajaj (Ed.), Human rights education: Theory, research, praxis (pp. 69–95). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN [United Nations] (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

  • UN (1994). Decade for human rights education. Website of the United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/Pages/Decade.aspx.

  • UN (2014). World program for human rights education: Plan of action for the third phase (2015–2019) of the world programme for human rights education. Website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/WPHRE/ThirdPhase/Pages/ThirdPhaseIndex.aspx.

  • UNESCO (1978). International congress on the teaching of human rights. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0003/000326/032644eb.pdf.

  • Volger, J. (2006). Chile: The rise of the Penguin Revolution. UpsideDownWorld.org. http://upsidedownworld.org/archives/chile/chile-the-rise-of-the-penguin-revolution/.

  • Zembylas, M. (2015). Foucault and human rights: Seeking the renewal of human rights education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 384–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kayum Ahmed.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, A.K. Disrupting power/entrenching sovereignty: The paradox of human rights education. Prospects 47, 3–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-018-9416-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-018-9416-2

Keywords

Navigation