, 41:323 | Cite as

Effective inclusive education: Equipping education professionals with necessary skills and knowledge

  • Deborah Deutsch Smith
  • Naomi Chowdhuri Tyler
Open File


As a result of educational reforms, students with disabilities are educated in inclusive settings to a greater degree than ever before. Regrettably, many teachers report that they feel unprepared to work effectively with these students. Because teacher effectiveness is strongly linked to student outcomes, these perceptions of inadequacy are clearly problematic. Improved teacher preparation is a necessity. Yet, teacher educators face their own challenges when trying to keep up with current literature and a rapidly expanding knowledge base. Web-based technology offers solutions to some of these challenges, yet not all Web-based resources are valid or reliable. The IRIS Center for Training Enhancements, funded by the U.S. Department of Education, provides free online resources for those working with struggling learners and students with disabilities. The resources are developed in collaboration with leading educational researchers, are highly rated, and are heavily used in multiple countries to improve the quality of teacher education.


Inclusive education Teacher education Interactive instructional technology Distance learning IRIS Center for Training Enhancements 


  1. ASCD [Association for Supervision, Curriculum Development] (2009). Creating global classrooms. Education Update, 51(1), 4.Google Scholar
  2. Bore, J. C. K. (2008). Perceptions of graduate students on the use of Web-based instruction in special education personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D. (2006). Software environments that support new designs for collaborative learning and assessment. Paper presented at the meeting of the California Council on Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D. (2009). Integrating technology and instruction for collaborative learning and assessment. Paper presented at the meeting of the California Council on Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2008). Mind and brain. In M. H. Immordino-Yang (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on the brain and learning (pp. 98–108). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullock, L. M., Gable, R. A., & Mohr, J. D. (2008). Technology-mediated instruction in distance education and teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cady, J., & Rearden, K. (2009). Delivering online professional development in mathematics to rural educators. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 281–298.Google Scholar
  10. Chopra, G. (2009). Education of children with disabilities: Examining policies and programmes in India. Paper presented at the eleventh biennial conference of the International Association of Special Education, Alicante, Spain.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, B. G., Cameron, D. L., & Tankersley, M. (2007). Inclusive teachers’ attitudinal ratings of their students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365–383.Google Scholar
  13. Crowe, E. (2010). Measuring what matters: A stronger accountability model for teacher education.
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Correlation between teachers and student achievement. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), Montreal.Google Scholar
  15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006a). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Developing a profession of teaching. Paper presented at the 2006 CalTEACH annual faculty professional conference, San Jose.Google Scholar
  17. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  18. Evertson, C. M., & Emmer, E. T. (2008). Classroom management for elementary teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Fern, E. (2010). Issue brief: Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Washington Partners.Google Scholar
  20. Florian, L. (2009). Special and inclusive education in Europe. Paper presented at the eleventh biennial conference of the International Association of Special Education, Alicante, Spain.Google Scholar
  21. Frey, T. J. (2009). An analysis of online professional development and outcomes for students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frick, T. W., Chandha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., & Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. R. (Eds.). (2008). Responsiveness to intervention. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  24. Futernick, K. (2007). A possible dream: Retraining California teachers so all students learn. Sacramento: CSU Center for Teacher Quality.Google Scholar
  25. Gomez, L. M., Sharin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L. (2008). Creating social relationships: The role of technology in pre-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grossman, L. (2010). 2010 person of the year: Mark Zuckerberg. Time, 176(26), 44–75.Google Scholar
  27. Holdheide, L. R., & Reschly, D. J. (2008). Teacher preparation to deliver inclusive services to students with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.Google Scholar
  28. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2003). Millenials go to college. Great Falls, VA: American Association of Registrars and Admissions Officers and Life Course Associates.Google Scholar
  29. IDEIA [Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act] (2004). Pub. L. No. 108–446. 118 STAT. 2647.Google Scholar
  30. IRIS Center (2009a). Results of instructional modules delivered through the internet on the learning outcomes of college students. Nashville: The IRIS Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  31. IRIS Center (2009b). Steppingstones project: Final report. Nashville: The IRIS Center, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
  32. IRIS Center for Training Enhancements (2010). Fidelity of implementation: Selecting and implementing evidence-based practices and programs.
  33. Jones, M. L. (2009). A study of novice special educators’ views of evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(2), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirkpatrick, D. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  35. Kopetz, P., & Nellie, A. (2009). Special needs education in Malawi, Africa: Implementing inclusion philosophy and methods. Paper presented at the eleventh biennial conference of the International Association of Special Education, Alicante, Spain.Google Scholar
  36. Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., Bruhn, A. L., Mahoney, M. E., & Driscoll, S. A. (2008). Primary prevention programs at the elementary level: Issues of treatment integrity, systematic screening, and reinforcement. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 465–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lane, K. L., & Wehby, J. (2002). Addressing antisocial behaviour in the schools: A call for action. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6, 4–9.Google Scholar
  38. Little, M. E., & King, L. M. (2008). Using online modules to bridge research to practice in classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 208–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockett, D., & Barwick, M. (2011). Knowledge translation: Introduction, overview and relationship with implementation science. Paper presented at the OESE/OSEP 6th annual Leveraging Resources Conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  40. McLeskey, J., & Billingsley, B. S. (2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.Google Scholar
  42. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Education Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, S. R., Drill, K., & Behrstock, E. (2010). Meeting teachers half way: Making educational research relevant to teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 31–34.Google Scholar
  44. National Research Council (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Division of Behavioral, Social Sciences, Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, L. (2010). Better monitoring of teacher-training programs is recommended. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  46. Nicoletti, A. & Merriman, W. (2007). Teaching millennial generation students. Momentum, 38(2), 28–31.Google Scholar
  47. No Child Left Behind Act (2001). Pub. L. No. 107–110, Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.Google Scholar
  48. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6).,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part2.pdf.
  49. Rosenberg, M. S., & Jackman, L. A. (2003). Development, implementation, and sustainability of comprehensive school-wide behavior management systems. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaneyfelt, T. M. (2001). Building bridges to quality. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(20), 2600–2601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, D. D., Pion, G., Skow, K., Tyler, N. C., Yzquierdo, Z., Brown, J. & Givner, C. (2005). IRIS challenge-based course enhancements. New Horizons for Learning Online Journal, 11(3).Google Scholar
  52. Smith, D. D., & Tyler, N. C. (2010). Introduction to special education: Making a difference. Columbus, OH: Pearson/Merrill.Google Scholar
  53. Wehby, J., & Lane, K. L. (2009). Classroom management. In A. Akin-Little, S. G. Little, M. A. Bray, & T. J. Kehle (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (pp. 141–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. West, J. E., & Whitby, P. J. S. (2008). Federal policy and the education of students with disabilities: Progress and the path forward. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–16.Google Scholar
  55. UNESCO IBE (2008). Inclusive education: The way of the future. Conclusions and recommendations of the 48th session of the International Conference on Education (ICE), Geneva, 25–28 November 2008.
  56. U.S. Department of Education (2010). Population and enrollment data, 2008.

Copyright information


Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Deutsch Smith
    • 1
  • Naomi Chowdhuri Tyler
    • 2
  1. 1.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA
  2. 2.Peabody CollegeVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations