References and bibliography
Abu Duhou I. 1999. School-based management. Paris: UNESCO
Bracho, T. 2001. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2001, primera evaluación externa [Quality schools Programme, PEC 2001, first external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Bracho, T. 2002. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2002, segunda evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2002, second external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Bracho T. 2003. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2003, tercera evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2003, third external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Bracho T. 2004. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2004, cuarta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2004, fourth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Bracho T. 2005. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2005, quinta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2005, fifth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Bracho, T. 2006. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2006, sexta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2006, sixth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas
Briggs K., Wohlstetter P. 2003. Key elements of a successful school based management strategy. School effectiveness and school improvement vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 351–372
Caldwell B. 2005. School-based management. Paris: IIEP-IAE
Cha, D. 2003. Participative decision making in Korean secondary school: a micropolitical analysis. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, Columbia University, New York.]
Cheng Y.C., Chan M.T. 2000. Implementation of school based management: a multi-perspective analysis of the case of Hong Kong. International review of education, vol. 46, no. 3/4, pp. 205–232
Corrales, J. 1999. The politics of education reform: bolstering the supply and demand; overcoming institutional blocks. Washington, DC: World Bank. (Education Reform and Management Series, 2 no 1.)
Di Gropello E. 2006. A comparative analysis of school-based management in Central America. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (Working paper, no. 72.)
Eskeland G.S., Filmer D. 2002. Autonomy, participation and learning in Argentine schools: findings and their implications for decentralization. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. 2766.)
Ferimeldi, F. 2005. Perception of government officials and principals implementing school based management in Indonesia. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.]
Gamage D.T., Sooksomchitra P. 2004. Decentralization and school-based management in Thailand. International review of education no. 50, pp. 289–305
Gertler P., Patrinos H., Rubio-Codina M. 2006. Empowering parents to improve education: evidence from rural Mexico. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. WPS3935–IE)
Grindle M. 2004. Despite the odds. The contentious politics of education reform. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación. Estandares Nacionales, 2004 Database. (Data based on a curriculum test to sixth-grade students and interviews to principals and teachers in a nationally representative random sample of schools)
Jimenez E., Sawada Y. 1999. Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s Educo program. The World Bank Economic Review vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 415–443
Kubal, M.R. 2003. The politics of education decentralization in Latin America: rhetoric and reality in Chile, Mexico, Argentina and Nicaragua. [Paper presented at the meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, Texas.]
Leithwood K., Menzies T. 1998. Forms and effects of school-based management: a review Educational policy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 325–246
Leroy, R.C. 2002. School-based management in Haiti: committee member perceptions of benefits, disadvantages, constraints and facilitators. [Unpublished doctoral essay submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, University of Miami, Miami, FL.]
Loera A. 2005. Cambios en las escuelas que participan en el PEC [Changes in schools participating in the Quality School Curriculum]. Chihuahua, México: Heurística Educativa
Loera A.; Cazares O. 2005. Análisis de cambios en logros académicos y eficacia social de las escuelas de la muestra cualitativa 2001–2005. Contraste con grupos de control [Analysis of changes in trends on student academic achievement and social efficacy in a sample of QSP schools participating in a qualitative evaluation. A comparison with control groups]. Chihuahua, México: Heurística Educativa
Loredo-Zamarron, J.J. 2004. Implementación intergubernamental de políticas educativas en México: el programa escuelas de calidad en San Luis Potosí [Intergovernmental introduction of educational policies in Mexico: the Quality Schools Programme in San Luis Potosi]. [Unpublished thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of␣Master in Administration and Public Policy, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Economicas, Mexico, D.F.]
Marti-Vazquez, L. 2000. The impact of decentralization and school-based management in Puerto Rico: a case study. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Columbia University, New York.]
McGinn N., Welsh T. 1999. Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how? Paris: UNESCO
Merino, G. 1999. Federalism and the policy process: using basic education as a test-case of decentralization in Mexico. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Harvard University, 1999.]
Murnane, R.J.; Willett, J.; Cárdenas, S. 2006. ¿Ha contribuido el programa escuelas de calidad a mejorar la educación pública en México? [Has the Quality Schools Programme improved public education in Mexico?]. In: Reimers, F., ed. Aprender mas y mejor, políticas, programas y oportunidades de aprendizaje en educación básica en México 2000–2006. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica
Nava, I. 2002. El programa escuelas de calidad: Análisis y evaluación [The Quality Schools Programme: analysis and evaluation]. [Unpublished thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Administration and Public Policy, Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, Mexico, DF.]
Park, J.P. 2000. Creating an autonomous school community: school-based management in Korea. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.]
Reimers F. 1997. The role of the community in expanding educational opportunities. the Educo Schools in El Salvador. In: Lynch J., Modgil C., Modgil S. eds Education and development: tradition and innovation, pp. 146–162. London: Cassell Publishers
Reimers, F.; Cárdenas, S. 2006. Oportunidades para el desarrollo educativo de México: los desafíos de la transición política [Opportunities for educational development in Mexico: the challenges of political transition]. Unpublished paper
Reimers F., Da Silva C., Trevino E. 2006. Where is the education in the conditional cash transfers of education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Scheerens J. 2000. Improving school effectiveness. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO
Schmelkes S. 2001. School autonomy and assessment in Mexico. Prospects, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 575–586
Skoufias E., Shapiro J. 2006. Evaluating the impact of Mexico’s quality schools program: the pitfalls of using non-experimental data. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. 4036)
Wilson, R.J. 2001. School-based management in Alberta: perception of public school leaders. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original language: English
Fernando Reimers (United States)
Ford Foundation Professor of International Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, where he directs the International Education Policy Programme and the Office of Global Education. His research focuses on the impact of education policy on the quality and relevance of education, the improvement of educational opportunities for low-income children and democratic citizenship education. E-mail: Fernando_Reimers@harvard.edu
Sergio Cárdenas (Mexico)
Doctoral student at the Harvard University Graduate School of Education. A lawyer by training, he holds a master degree in administration and public policy from the Center for Economics Research and Teaching in Mexico City. He has worked for the Mexican Secretariat of Public Education and his current research focuses on the analysis of educational policies that may contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities. E-mail: cardense@gse.harvard.edu
About this article
Cite this article
Reimers, F., Cárdenas, S. Who benefits from school-based management in Mexico?. Prospects 37, 37–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9015-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9015-0