Skip to main content
Log in

Who benefits from school-based management in Mexico?

  • EDUCATIONAL GOVERNANCE AT LOCAL LEVELS
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References and bibliography

  • Abu Duhou I. 1999. School-based management. Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracho, T. 2001. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2001, primera evaluación externa [Quality schools Programme, PEC 2001, first external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Bracho, T. 2002. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2002, segunda evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2002, second external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Bracho T. 2003. Programa Escuelas de Calidad, PEC 2003, tercera evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2003, third external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Bracho T. 2004. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2004, cuarta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2004, fourth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Bracho T. 2005. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2005, quinta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2005, fifth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Bracho, T. 2006. Programa Escuelas de Calidad PEC, 2006, sexta evaluación externa [Quality Schools Programme, PEC 2006, sixth external evaluation]. México, DF: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

  • Briggs K., Wohlstetter P. 2003. Key elements of a successful school based management strategy. School effectiveness and school improvement vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 351–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell B. 2005. School-based management. Paris: IIEP-IAE

  • Cha, D. 2003. Participative decision making in Korean secondary school: a micropolitical analysis. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, Columbia University, New York.]

  • Cheng Y.C., Chan M.T. 2000. Implementation of school based management: a multi-perspective analysis of the case of Hong Kong. International review of education, vol. 46, no. 3/4, pp. 205–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrales, J. 1999. The politics of education reform: bolstering the supply and demand; overcoming institutional blocks. Washington, DC: World Bank. (Education Reform and Management Series, 2 no 1.)

  • Di Gropello E. 2006. A comparative analysis of school-based management in Central America. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (Working paper, no. 72.)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland G.S., Filmer D. 2002. Autonomy, participation and learning in Argentine schools: findings and their implications for decentralization. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. 2766.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferimeldi, F. 2005. Perception of government officials and principals implementing school based management in Indonesia. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.]

  • Gamage D.T., Sooksomchitra P. 2004. Decentralization and school-based management in Thailand. International review of education no. 50, pp. 289–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler P., Patrinos H., Rubio-Codina M. 2006. Empowering parents to improve education: evidence from rural Mexico. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. WPS3935–IE)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle M. 2004. Despite the odds. The contentious politics of education reform. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación. Estandares Nacionales, 2004 Database. (Data based on a curriculum test to sixth-grade students and interviews to principals and teachers in a nationally representative random sample of schools)

  • Jimenez E., Sawada Y. 1999. Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s Educo program. The World Bank Economic Review vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 415–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubal, M.R. 2003. The politics of education decentralization in Latin America: rhetoric and reality in Chile, Mexico, Argentina and Nicaragua. [Paper presented at the meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, Texas.]

  • Leithwood K., Menzies T. 1998. Forms and effects of school-based management: a review Educational policy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 325–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, R.C. 2002. School-based management in Haiti: committee member perceptions of benefits, disadvantages, constraints and facilitators. [Unpublished doctoral essay submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, University of Miami, Miami, FL.]

  • Loera A. 2005. Cambios en las escuelas que participan en el PEC [Changes in schools participating in the Quality School Curriculum]. Chihuahua, México: Heurística Educativa

  • Loera A.; Cazares O. 2005. Análisis de cambios en logros académicos y eficacia social de las escuelas de la muestra cualitativa 2001–2005. Contraste con grupos de control [Analysis of changes in trends on student academic achievement and social efficacy in a sample of QSP schools participating in a qualitative evaluation. A comparison with control groups]. Chihuahua, México: Heurística Educativa

  • Loredo-Zamarron, J.J. 2004. Implementación intergubernamental de políticas educativas en México: el programa escuelas de calidad en San Luis Potosí [Intergovernmental introduction of educational policies in Mexico: the Quality Schools Programme in San Luis Potosi]. [Unpublished thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of␣Master in Administration and Public Policy, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Economicas, Mexico, D.F.]

  • Marti-Vazquez, L. 2000. The impact of decentralization and school-based management in Puerto Rico: a case study. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Columbia University, New York.]

  • McGinn N., Welsh T. 1999. Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how? Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino, G. 1999. Federalism and the policy process: using basic education as a test-case of decentralization in Mexico. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Harvard University, 1999.]

  • Murnane, R.J.; Willett, J.; Cárdenas, S. 2006. ¿Ha contribuido el programa escuelas de calidad a mejorar la educación pública en México? [Has the Quality Schools Programme improved public education in Mexico?]. In: Reimers, F., ed. Aprender mas y mejor, políticas, programas y oportunidades de aprendizaje en educación básica en México 2000–2006. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica

  • Nava, I. 2002. El programa escuelas de calidad: Análisis y evaluación [The Quality Schools Programme: analysis and evaluation]. [Unpublished thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Administration and Public Policy, Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, Mexico, DF.]

  • Park, J.P. 2000. Creating an autonomous school community: school-based management in Korea. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.]

  • Reimers F. 1997. The role of the community in expanding educational opportunities. the Educo Schools in El Salvador. In: Lynch J., Modgil C., Modgil S. eds Education and development: tradition and innovation, pp. 146–162. London: Cassell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F.; Cárdenas, S. 2006. Oportunidades para el desarrollo educativo de México: los desafíos de la transición política [Opportunities for educational development in Mexico: the challenges of political transition]. Unpublished paper

  • Reimers F., Da Silva C., Trevino E. 2006. Where is the education in the conditional cash transfers of education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens J. 2000. Improving school effectiveness. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmelkes S. 2001. School autonomy and assessment in Mexico. Prospects, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 575–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoufias E., Shapiro J. 2006. Evaluating the impact of Mexico’s quality schools program: the pitfalls of using non-experimental data. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (No. 4036)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.J. 2001. School-based management in Alberta: perception of public school leaders. [Unpublished dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Reimers.

Additional information

Original language: English

Fernando Reimers (United States)

Ford Foundation Professor of International Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, where he directs the International Education Policy Programme and the Office of Global Education. His research focuses on the impact of education policy on the quality and relevance of education, the improvement of educational opportunities for low-income children and democratic citizenship education. E-mail: Fernando_Reimers@harvard.edu

Sergio Cárdenas (Mexico)

Doctoral student at the Harvard University Graduate School of Education. A lawyer by training, he holds a master degree in administration and public policy from the Center for Economics Research and Teaching in Mexico City. He has worked for the Mexican Secretariat of Public Education and his current research focuses on the analysis of educational policies that may contribute to the reproduction of social inequalities. E-mail: cardense@gse.harvard.edu

About this article

Cite this article

Reimers, F., Cárdenas, S. Who benefits from school-based management in Mexico?. Prospects 37, 37–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9015-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-007-9015-0

Keywords

Navigation