What is the science? What have people instead of, and why do we need corrosiology?
- 34 Downloads
People need a science comprehending both their and its own destination, universal, far-seeing, harmonizing the whole biosphere, and preventing from mistakes. It was such a science, Ya.M. Kolotyrkin has dreamt about, and such was its own ancient trend. However,... Having substantially accelerated its development and pragmatized it, the industrial revolution split it into a handy set of narrow-seeing weakly bound branches, and thus deprived them of panoramic sight and ability to distinguish between the essence and illusion. At first sight, everything is OK (especially after the Scientific-technological revolution that has illusively conquered crises): the science finds mineral deposits, discovers the ways of and teaches how to make something of them, invents and develops everything that fills our everyday life, serves and substitutes for us in industry, joins the continents, and so on. But in essence... this is the shortest way to the hell for our children’s children. We do pave it ourselves by exhausting the mines and wells so as if the mineral resources, which were created by the Supreme Intelligence (by means of the numerous past biospheres for billions of years!), do not have a price that hundreds and thousands times exceeds the market cost of everything we produce of them. By means of a thorough analysis, unbreakable semantic definitions of the basic triad of scientific categories Life, Science, and Verity are clarified. As an example of the quality of theories that are still in use, absolutely feebleness of the S. Arrhenius concept of electrolytic dissociation (which has stopped the development of electrochemistry for more than a century) is shown. The reunion and closest cooperation between the science and Church is the last chance for the man to get the True Science and Life!
KeywordsInorganic Chemistry Triad Mineral Resource Everyday Life Mineral Deposit
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kondakov, I.I., Logicheskii slovar’: Spravochnik (Logical Dictionary: Reference Book), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.Google Scholar
- 2.Slovar’ russkogo yazyka (Dictionary of Russian Language), Moscow: Russ. Yazyk, 1986.Google Scholar
- 3.The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English, 7th Edition, Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.Google Scholar
- 4.Websters Desk Dictionary of Current English Language, New York: Portland, 1990.Google Scholar
- 5.Sovetskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (Soviet Encyclopedia), Moscow: Sov. Entsiklopedia, 1981.Google Scholar
- 6.Dobrotin, R.B., Karpilo, V.G., Kerova, L.S., and Trifonov, D.N., Letopis’ zhizni i deyatel’nosti D.I. Mendeleeva (Chronicle of Life and Activities of D.I. Mendeleev), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.Google Scholar
- 7.Volkov, V.A., Vonskii, E.V., and Kuznetsova, E.G., Vydayushchiesya khimiki mira: Biograficheskii spravochnik (Eminent Chemists of the World: Biographical Reference Book), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1991.Google Scholar
- 8.Pauling, L., General Chemistry (An Introduction to Descriptive Chemistry and Modern Chemical Theory), 2nd Edition, San-Francisco: Freeman, 1958.Google Scholar
- 9.Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, Bockris, J.O’M. and Conway, B.E., Eds., London: Butterworths, 1954.Google Scholar
- 10.Pauling, L., General Chemistry, 3rd Edition, San-Francisco: Freeman, 1970.Google Scholar
- 11.Novakovskii, V.M., Zashch. Met., 1983, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 3.Google Scholar