Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Radar scanning the world production frontier

  • Jens J. Krüger


In this paper we report the results from a detailed investigation of the shifts of the world production frontier function over the period 1980–2010. Analogous to a radar we implement a novel measurement approach for these shifts using nonparametrically computed directional distance functions to scan the frontier shifts across the entire input–output space. The shifts of the frontier function measured in this way are analyzed by regression methods. The results point towards substantial non-neutrality of technological progress and furthermore show that technological progress is more pronounced in regions of high output and in regions where human capital is intensely used.


Non-neutral technological change World production frontier Nonparametric frontier function 

JEL Classification

C14 E23 O11 O47 



I am grateful to the participants of the 15th International Schumpeter Conference 2014 in Jena for their suggestions. Benny Hampf also provided many insightful comments. In the previous version of the paper I used generalized additive models for estimating the response surfaces. Simon Wood provided generous advice on these models which is gratefully acknowledged. I am also grateful to the inspiring comments of three anonymous referees which triggered a complete reconsideration of the approach and substantially improved the paper. Of course, all errors are mine.


  1. Acemoglu D (2002) Directed technical change. Rev Econ Stud 69:781–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Zilibotti F (2001) Productivity differences. Quart J Econ 116:563–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen RC (2012) Technology and the great divergence. Explor Econ Hist 49:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson AB, Stiglitz JE (1969) A new view of technological change. Econ J 79:573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badunenko O, Henderson DJ, Russell RR (2013) Polarization of the worldwide distribution of productivity. J Prod Anal 40:153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badunenko O, Henderson DJ, Zelenyuk V (2008) Technological change and transition: relative contributions to worldwide growth during the 1990s. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 70:461–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30:1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barro RJ, Lee J-W (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the World, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caselli F, Coleman WJ II (2006) The world technology frontier. Am Econ Rev 96:499–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 70:407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czernich N, Falck O, Kretschmer T, Wößmann L (2011) Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. Econ J 121:505–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (1993) Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83Google Scholar
  14. Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feenstra RC, Heston A, Timmer MP, Deng H (2009) Estimating real production and expenditures across nations: a proposal for improving the penn world tables. Rev Econ Stat 91:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feenstra RC, Inklaar R, Timmer MP (2015) The next generation of the penn world table. Am Econ Rev 105:3150–3182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernald J (2015) Productivity and potential output before, during, and after the great recession. In: Parker JA, Woodford M (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual 2014, vol 29, pp 1–51Google Scholar
  18. Hackman ST (2008) Production economics: integrating the microeconomic and engineering perspectives. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quart J Econ 114:83–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson DJ, Russell RR (2005) Human capital and convergence: a production-frontier approach. Int Econ Rev 46:1167–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henderson DJ, Zelenyuk V (2007) Testing for (efficiency) catching-up. South Econ J 73:1003–1019Google Scholar
  22. Jerzmanowski M (2007) Total factor productivity differences: appropriate rechnology vs. efficiency. Eur Econ Rev 51:2080–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jorgenson DW (2001) Information technology and the US economy. Am Econ Rev 91:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jorgenson DW, Vu K (2007) Information technology and the world growth resurgence. German Econ Rev 8:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koller M, Stahel WA (2011) Sharpening wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:2504–2515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krüger JJ (2015) Radar scanning the world production frontier. Darmstadt discussion papers in economics 222Google Scholar
  27. Kumar S, Russell RR (2002) Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence. Am Econ Rev 92:527–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lumley A, Heagerty P (1999) Weighted empirical adaptive variance estimators for correlated data regression. J R Stat Soc B 61:459–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maronna RA, Martin RD, Yohai VJ (2006) Robust statistics: theory and methods. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ng S, Wright JH (2013) Facts and challenges from the great recession for forecasting and macroeconomic modeling. J Econ Lit 51:1120–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliner SD, Sichel DE, Stiroh KJ (2007) Explaining a productive decade. Brook Papers Econ Activity 1:81–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Dev 22:1325–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renaud O, Victoria-Feser M-P (2010) A robust coefficient of determination for regression. J Stat Plann Inference 140:1852–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rousseau PL (2008) Biased and unbiased technological change. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheather SJ, Jones MC (1991) A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. J Roy Stat Soc 53(Series B):683–690Google Scholar
  36. Solow RM (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Yohai VJ (1987) High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. Ann Stat 15:642–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law and EconomicsDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations