Stochastic frontier models with threshold efficiency
- 403 Downloads
This paper proposes a tail-truncated stochastic frontier model that allows for the truncation of technical efficiency from below. The truncation bound implies the inefficiency threshold for survival. Specifically, this paper assumes a uniform distribution of technical inefficiency and derives the likelihood function. Even though this distributional assumption imposes a strong restriction that technical inefficiency has a uniform probability density over [0, θ], where θ is the threshold parameter, this model has two advantages: (1) the reduction in the number of parameters compared with more complicated tail-truncated models allows better performance in numerical optimization; and (2) it is useful for empirical studies of the distribution of efficiency or productivity, particularly the truncation of the distribution. The Monte Carlo simulation results support the argument that this model approximates the distribution of inefficiency precisely, as the data-generating process not only follows the uniform distribution but also the truncated half-normal distribution if the inefficiency threshold is small.
KeywordsStochastic frontier Technical efficiency Threshold inefficiency Uniform distribution Productivity distribution
JEL classificationC13 C21 D24 L11
Young Hoon Lee would like to acknowledge the supports by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by Korean Government (NRF-2010-330-B00069) and Sogang University Research Grant.
- Almanidis P, Sickles R (2010) The skewness problem in stochastic frontier models : fact or fiction?, forthcoming in Exploring Research Frontiers in Contemporary Statistics and Econometrics: A Festschrift in Honor of Leopold Simar, Ingrid Van Keilegom and Paul Wilson (eds), Springer PublishingGoogle Scholar
- De Loecker J (2009) Product differentiation, multi-product firms and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity, Working Paper, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Dunne T, Klimek S, Schmitz JA (2008) Does Foreign competition spur productivity? evidence from Post WWII US cement manufacturing, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
- Greene WH (2008) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
- Holmes TJ, Schmitz JA (2001) Competition at work: Railroad vs. monopoly in US shipping. Fed Reserve Bank Minneap Q Rev 19(1):3–29Google Scholar
- Lee YH (1996) Tail truncated stochastic frontier models. J Econ Theory Econom 2:137–152Google Scholar
- Matsa D (2011) Competition and product quality in the supermarket industry. Q J Econ 126(3):1539–1591Google Scholar
- Qian J, Sickles R (2008) Stochastic frontiers with bounded inefficiency, mimeo, Rice UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt P, Sickles R (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 2(4):367–374Google Scholar
- Stevenson RE (1980) Generalized stochastic frontier estimation. J Econom 13:57–66Google Scholar