Advertisement

Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 237–253 | Cite as

Firm performance and knowledge spillovers from academic, industrial and foreign linkages: the case of China

  • Mahmut Yaşar
  • Catherine J. Morrison Paul
Article

Abstract

Firm performance may be enhanced by linkages with academic institutions, other firms, and foreign markets that confer knowledge spillovers as well as internal R&D that creates firm-specific knowledge. In particular, firm productivity and innovation may be enhanced by positive externalities from knowledge and technology produced by universities and research institutions (URIs) and diffused to the domestic economy. Productive contributions from such linkages might be particularly expected in China, where policy measures have explicitly supported and facilitated connections between URIs and firms to stimulate economic development and competitiveness. In this paper, we measure the performance impact of such knowledge spillovers in Chinese firms by using a variety of specifications, estimators, and robustness checks, including an “instrumental variable” specification that controls for endogeneity. We find more patent activity in Chinese firms with URI connections and enhanced firm productivity particularly from linkages with research institutions (RIs). Introduction of new products, processes, and new businesses is also positively associated with linkages with research institutions, as well as with linkages with other firms.

Keywords

China Knowledge spillovers Economic performance Research institutions University Firm Foreign linkages 

JEL Classification

C26 D24 L60 O30 O53 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the editor and two anonymous referees for their constructive and useful suggestions.

References

  1. Adams JD (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J Political Econ 98(4):673–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams JD (2002) Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. J Econ Geogr 2:253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora A, Gambardella A, Torrisi S (2004) In the footsteps of Silicon Valley? Indian and Irish software in the international division of labor. In: Bresnahan T, Gambardella A (eds) Building high-tech regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 78–120Google Scholar
  5. Arundel A, Kabla I (1998) What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Res Policy 27:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch D (1998) Agglomeration and the location of economic activity. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 14:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
  8. Aw BY, Palangkaraya A (2004) Local knowledge spillovers in the Indonesian manufacturing industry. Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 18/04Google Scholar
  9. Baily MN, Chakrabarti AK (1988) Innovation and productivity crisis. Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B (2004) Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res Policy 33(10):1477–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard AB, Jensen JB (1995) Exporters, jobs and wages in US manufacturing: 1976–1987. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, pp 67–119Google Scholar
  12. Beugelsdijk S, Cornet M (2001) How far do they reach? The localization of industrial and academic knowledge spillovers in the Netherlands. CPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis discussion paperGoogle Scholar
  13. Blomström M, Kokko A (1998) Multinational corporations and spillovers. J Econ Surv 12:247–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bresnahan T, Gambardella A (2004) Building high-tech regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Cagliano R, Chiesa V, Manzini R (2000) Differences and similarities in managing technological collaborations in research, development and manufacturing: a case study. J Eng Manag 17:193–224Google Scholar
  16. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics. Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang P, Shih H (2004) The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation 24:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen K, Kenney M (2007) Universities/research institutes and regional innovation systems: the cases of Beijing and Shenzhen. World Dev 35(6):1056–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86:54–70Google Scholar
  21. Cohen W, Levin R (1989) Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In: Schmalensee R, Willig R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1060–1098Google Scholar
  22. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eaton J, Kortum S (2001) Trade in capital goods. Eur Econ Rev 45(7):1195–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Etzkowitz H (1999) The second academic revolution: MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. Gordon and Breach, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Etzkowitz H, Zhou C (2007) Regional innovation initiator: the entrepreneurial university in various triple helix models. Theme Paper for Triple Helix VI Conference, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou L, Feng, H (2004) A research report on the performance and problems of university-owned firms in the Zhongguancun Science Park. Manuscript. Peking University e-Business CenterGoogle Scholar
  27. Gourieroux C, Montfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to Poisson models. Econometrica 52:701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greene WH (1994) Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models. Working paper, NYUGoogle Scholar
  29. Greene W (2003) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  30. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10(1):92–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1797Google Scholar
  32. Griliches Z, Lichtenberg F (1984) R&D and productivity at the industry level: is there still a relationship? In: Griliches Z (ed) R&D, patents, and productivity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. Groves T, Hong Y, McMillan J, Naughton B (1994) Autonomy and incentives in Chinese state enterprises. Q J Econ 109(1):183–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haddad M, Harrison A (1993) Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment. J Dev Econ 42:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT (2001) Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program. J Technol Transf 26:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT (2003) Universities as research partners. Rev Econ Stat 85(2):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hershberg E, Nabeshima K, Yusuf S (2007) Opening the Ivory Tower to business: university industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Dev 35(6):931–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hsiung DI (2002) An evaluation of China’s science and technology system and its impact on the research community. A special report for the environment, science and technology section. U.S. Embassy, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of r&d: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Am Econ Rev 76(5):984–1001Google Scholar
  40. Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79:957–970Google Scholar
  41. Kokko A (1994) Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. J Dev Econ 43:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lederman D (2007) Product innovation by incumbent firms in developing economies: the roles of research and development expenditures, trade policy, and the investment climate. Report. The World Bank, Development Research GroupGoogle Scholar
  43. Lichtenberg F, Siegel D (1991) The impact of R&D investment on productivity—new evidence using R&D—LRD data. Econ Inq 29(2):203–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Volume 7 of advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousands OaksGoogle Scholar
  45. Malecki EJ (1997) Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional and national competitiveness. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Res Policy 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mansfield E (1997) Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Res Policy 26:773–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Medda G, Piga C, Siegel DS (2005) University R&D and firm productivity: evidence from Italy. J Technol Transf 30(1/2):199–205Google Scholar
  49. Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  50. Monjon S, Waelbroeck P (2003) Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. Int J Ind Organ 21(9):1255–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noble GW (2000) Conspicuous failures and hidden strengths of the ITRI model: Taiwan’s technology policy toward hard disk drives and CD-ROMs. UCSD. The Information Storage Industry Center Report. 2000–02Google Scholar
  52. Olley S, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pakes A, Griliches Z (1980) Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first report. Econ Lett 5:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul CJM (1999) Cost structure and the measurement of economic performance. Kluwer Academic Press, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Qian Y (1996) Enterprise reform in china: agency problems and political control. Econ Transit 4(2):427–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raut LK (1995) R&D spillover and productivity growth: evidence from Indian private firms. J Dev Econ 48:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Romer P (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. J Econ Perspect 8:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenthal SS, Strange WS (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 2019–2171Google Scholar
  59. Santoro MD, Chakrabarti AK (2002) Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Res Policy 31(7):1163–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saxenian A (2004) Taiwan’s Hsinchu region: imitator and partner for Silicon Valley. In: Bresnahan T, Gambardella A (eds) Building high-tech regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–228Google Scholar
  61. Shane S (2001) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Manage Sci 47(2):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thursby J, Fuller AW, Thursby M (2009) U.S. faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. Res Policy 28:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trebilcock M, Leng J (2006) The role of formal contract law and enforcement in economic development. Va Law Rev 92:1517–1579Google Scholar
  64. Vishwasrao S, Bosshardt W (2001) Foreign ownership and technology adoption: evidence from Indian firms. J Dev Econ 65:367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. WIPO (2005) Developing frameworks to facilitate university-industry technology transfer: a checklist of possible actions. World Intellectual Property OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  66. WIPO (2007) Technology transfer, intellectual property rights and university–industry partnerships: the experience of China, India, Japan, Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand. World Intellectual Property Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  67. Woodward D, Figueiredo O, Guimaraes P (2006) Beyond the Silicon Valley: university R&D and high-technology location. J Urban Econ 60:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu W (2007) Cultivating research universities and industrial linkages in China: the case of Shangahai. World Dev 35(6):1075–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xue L (2006) The role of universities in China’s economic development: a national innovation system perspective. Draft, Tsinghua University, School of Public PolicyGoogle Scholar
  70. Yasar M (2010) Imported capital input, absorptive capacity, and firm performance: evidence from firm-level data. Econ Inq (Forthcoming)Google Scholar
  71. Yasar M, Paul CJM (2007) International linkages and productivity at the plant level: foreign direct investment, exports, imports and licensing. J Int Econ 71(2):373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yasar M, Paul CJM (2008) Foreign technology transfer and productivity: evidence from a matched sample. J Bus Econ Stat 26(1):105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yasar M, Raciborski R, Poi B (2008) Production function estimation in Stata using the Olley and Pakes method. Stata J 8(2):1–11Google Scholar
  74. Zhang G (2005) Promoting IPR policy and enforcement in China: summary of dialogues between OECD and China. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou P, Leydesdorff L (2006) The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Res Policy 35(1):83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations