Skip to main content
Log in

BAM: a bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A decade ago the Range Adjusted Measure (RAM) was introduced for use with Additive Models. The empirical experience gained since then recommends developing a new measure with similar characteristics but with more discriminatory power. This task is accomplished in this paper by introducing the Bounded Adjusted Measure (BAM) in connection with a new family of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) additive models that incorporate lower bounds for inputs and upper bounds for outputs while accepting any returns to scale imposed on the production technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aida K, Cooper WW, Pastor JT, Sueyoshi T (1998) Evaluating water supply services in Japan with Ram: a range-adjusted measure of inefficiency. OMEGA 26(2):207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali AI, Seiford LM (1993) The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. Chapter 3. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Pastor JT (2008) Bounded linear efficiency models, Trabajos I + D, CIO-2008-23, ISSN 1576-7264, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Spain

  • Asmild M, Pastor JT (2010) Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures. OMEGA 38:475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (1999) Efficiency evaluations based on potential (non-proportional) improvements. J Prod Anal 12:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W (1999) Hölder distance function and measurement of technical efficiency. J Prod Anal 11(2):111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98(2):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Seiford L, Stutz J (1985) Foundations of data envelopment analysis and Pareto-Koopmans empirical production functions. J Econom 30:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Park KS, Pastor JT (1999) RAM: a range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models and relations to other models and measures in DEA. J Prod Anal 11(1):5–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell CAK, Pastor JT (1995) Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Oper Res Lett 18:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT (1994) “New Additive Models for handling Zero and Negative Data”, Working Paper, Depto. Estad. e Inv. Oper., Universidad de Alicante, Spain

  • Pastor JT, Ruiz JL (2007) Variables with Negative Values in Dea, Chapter 4. In: Cook WD, Zhu J (eds) Modelling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115(3):596–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT, Lovell CAK, Aparicio J (2008) Families of linear efficiency models based on Debreu’s loss function, Trabajos I + D, CIO I-2008-12, ISSN 1576-7264, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Spain

  • Ray SC (2004) Data envelopment analysis. Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp JA, Meng W, Liu W (2007) A modified slack-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with natural negative outputs and inputs. J Oper Res Soc 58:1672–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Portela MC, Thanassoulis E (2006) Malmquist indexes using a geometric distance function (GDF). Application to a sample of Portuguese bank branches. J Prod Anal 25:25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Portela MCA, Thanassoulis E, Simpson G (2004) Negative data in DEA: a directional distance function approach applied to bank branches. J Oper Res Soc 55:1111–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to hereby express their gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grant MTM2009-10479 and to the CIO for financial support. We would also like to thank Dr. Victor Podinovski for his suggestions during the NAPW 2010 meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús T. Pastor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, W.W., Pastor, J.T., Borras, F. et al. BAM: a bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models. J Prod Anal 35, 85–94 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0190-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0190-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation