Skip to main content
Log in

Estimates of technical inefficiency in stochastic frontier models with panel data: generalized panel jackknife estimation

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimates of technical inefficiency based on fixed effects estimation of the stochastic frontier model with panel data are biased upward. Previous work has attempted to correct this bias using the bootstrap, but in simulations the bootstrap corrects only part of the bias. The usual panel jackknife is based on the assumption that the bias is of order T −1 and is similar to the bootstrap. We show that when there is a tie or a near tie for the best firm, the bias is of order T −1/2, not T −1, and this calls for a different form of the jackknife. The generalized panel jackknife is quite successful in removing the bias. However, the resulting estimates have a large variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JE, Gray HL, Watkins TA (1971) An asymptotic characterization of bias reduction by jackknifing. Ann Math Stat 42:1606–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RB (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Val I, Vella F (2007) Bias corrections for two-step fixed effects panel data estimator. IZA Discussion Paper 2690, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

  • Gray HL, Schucany WR (1972) The generalized jackknife statistic. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn J, Kuersteiner G (2007) Bias reduction for dynamic nonlinear panel models with fixed effects. Unpublished Manuscript

  • Hahn J, Newey W (2004) Jackknife and analytical bias reduction for nonlinear panel models. Econometrica 72:1295–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Härdle W, Simar L (1995) Iterated bootstrap with applications to frontier models. J Prod Anal 6:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Kim Y, Schmidt P (2007) On the accuracy of bootstrap confidence intervals for efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data. J Prod Anal 28:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RG (1974) The jackknife—a review. Biometrika 61:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Park BU, Simar L (1994) Efficient semiparametric estimation in a stochastic frontier model. J Am Stat Assoc 89:929–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MM, Lee LF (1981) The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. J Dev Econ 9:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quenouille MH (1956) Note on bias in estimation. Biometrika 61:353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P, Sickles R (1984) Production frontiers and panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 2:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schucany WR, Gray HL, Owen DB (1971) On bias reduction in estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 66:524–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1958) Bias and confidence in not quite large samples (Abstract). Ann Math Stat 18:614

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satchachai, P., Schmidt, P. Estimates of technical inefficiency in stochastic frontier models with panel data: generalized panel jackknife estimation. J Prod Anal 34, 83–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0183-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0183-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation