Advertisement

Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 5–29 | Cite as

Restricting Multiple-Output Multiple-Input DEA Models by Disaggregating the Output–Input Vector

  • John Salerian
  • Chris Chan
Article

Abstract

One of the strengths of DEA in the measurement of technical efficiency is that it readily accommodates multiple-output multiple-input production technologies. In doing so, it assumes that each of the inputs is used jointly in the production of each output. In some applied studies, this can be undesirable. We propose a new disaggregated formulation that allows a specific output to be made independent of a specific input, while maintaining the joint production relationship for the other outputs and inputs. We demonstrate the approach by applying it to measure the technical efficiency of national rail systems in 20 countries between 1990 and 1998.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis multiple outputs productivity production possibility set railways restrictions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Ali, A.I., Seiford, L.M. 1993The Mathematical Programming Approach to Efficiency AnalysisFried, H.O.Lovell, C.A.K.Schmidt, S.S. eds. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and ApplicationsOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beasely, J.E. 1995“Determining Teaching and Research Efficiencies”Journal of the Operational Research Society46441452Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. 1977Economic Theory and Operations AnalysisPrentice-Hall IncLondon160161Google Scholar
  4. Charnes, A.Cooper, W.W.Lewin, A.Y.Seiford, L.M. eds. 1994Data Envelopment Analysis; Theory, Methodology and ApplicationsKluwer Academic PublishersBostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, W.D., Hababou, M., Tuenter, H.J.H. 2000“Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches”Journal of Productivity Analysis14209224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lovell, C.A.K. 1993Production Frontiers and Productive EfficiencyFried, H.O.Lovell, C.A.K.Schmidt, S.S. eds. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and ApplicationsOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Mar Molinero, C. 1996“On the Joint Determination of Efficiencies in a Data Envelopment Context”Journal of the Operational Research Society4712731279Google Scholar
  8. PC (Productivity Commission)1999aProgress in Rail Reform, Report No. 6AusInfoCanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. PC(Productivity Commission)1999bAn Assessment of the Performance of Australian Railways, 1990 to 1998, supplement to inquiry report ‘Progress in Rail Reform’AusInfoCanberraNovember.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Productivity CommissionMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations