Advertisement

Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 245–273 | Cite as

Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Post-Privatization Chilean Hydroelectric Industry

  • Scott E. Atkinson
  • Claudia Elizabeth Halabí
Article

Abstract

Chile’s hydroelectric industry was privatized in 1985, but required to operate within a regulatory framework designed to achieve a competitive outcome. A centralized dispatch center was established to ensure production at minimum cost, subject to constraints on minimum release and minimum reservoir stock. A reluctance to rapidly reduce the industry work force may also have existed. We develop a constrained cost-minimization model for thermal and hydro generation to obtain the shadow price of water and to determine the qualitative effect of these constraints on allocative efficiency. Using panel data from 1986–1997, we assess the economic efficiency of the hydro industry by estimating a stochastic distance frontier and price equations from the dual cost-minimization problem. We find dramatic increases in technical change and productivity change, with positive efficiency change for all years but the last. We also observe a dramatic decline in allocative inefficiencies over our sample period. The share of hydro generation from run-of-river and thermal plants relative to reservoir plants has increased, presumably in reaction to the water release and reservoir stock constraints, reducing the relative over-utilization of capital to water from the pre-1985 regime. Further, the over-utilization of labor to capital and water has fallen over time. However, considerable allocative inefficiencies remain, consistent with our finding of industry-wide scale economies. Substantial cost savings would result if technical and allocative efficiency were eliminated.

Keywords

distance function estimation technical change productivity change allocative efficiency Chilean hydroelectric generation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D., Turvey, R. 1977Electricity EconomicsJohns Hopkins University PressBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, S., Cornwell, C., Honerkamp, O. 2003“Measuring and Decomposing Productivity Change: Stochastic Distance Function Estimation vs DEA”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics84284294Google Scholar
  3. Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P., Sickles, R.C. 1990“Production Frontiers with Time Series Variation in Efficiency Levels”Journal of Econometrics46185200Google Scholar
  4. Del Sol, P., Perez, M. 1995“Economias de Escala y Tarificacion en el Sector Electrico Chileno”Revista de Análisis Económico1023766Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, B.K., Flaim, S.J., Howitt, R.E. 1999“Optimal Provision of Hydroelectric Power Under Environmental and Regulatory Constraints”Land Economics75267283Google Scholar
  6. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, K. 1994Production FrontiersCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Färe, R., Primont, D. 1995Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and ApplicationsKluwer Academic PublishersDorderechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, R. and P. Serra. 2001. Regulating the Electricity Sector in Latin America, mimeo. Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de ChileGoogle Scholar
  9. Halabí, C.E. 2000. Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Privatized Hydroelectric Generation with a Sometimes Free Input, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Georgia, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, L. 1982“Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimation”Econometrica5010291054Google Scholar
  11. Luenberger, D.G. 1998Investment ScienceOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Megginson, W.L. 1994“The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis”Journal of Finance49403452Google Scholar
  13. Newey, W.D., West, K.D. 1987“A simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix”.Econometrica5570306Google Scholar
  14. Nijman, T., Verbeek, M. 1992“Nonresponse in Panel Data: The Impact on Estimates of a Life Cycle Consumption Function”Journal of Applied Econometrics7243257Google Scholar
  15. Pollitt M.G. 1997. The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Electricity Supply Industry in Northern Ireland–Will it be Worth it?, working paper, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Scully, G. 1999“Reform and Efficiency Gains in the New Zealand Electrical Supply Industry”Journal of Productivity Analysis11133147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott E. Atkinson
    • 1
  • Claudia Elizabeth Halabí
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.School of BusinessUniversidad Santo TomásSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations