Demographic Moderation of the Prediction of Adolescent Alcohol Involvement Trajectories
- 232 Downloads
Several school- and family-based preventive interventions target and effectively reduce adolescent alcohol misuse. However, whether demographic groups achieve equal success with these interventions is unclear. In particular, most interventions target younger adolescents, and program effectiveness tends to be measured with majority White samples; subgroup analyses are rarely reported. We analyze longitudinal data from a sample of N = 6189 adolescents (40% Black, 60% White; 50% female) in 6th through 12th grade to quantify the degree to which age, race, and gender moderate the associations between seven well-known risk and protective factors (RPFs) that serve as common intervention targets. The RPFs that we study are drawn from social learning theory, problem behavior theory, and social control theory, including individual factors (positive alcohol expectancies and deviant behavior), family context (perceived parental involvement, perceived parent alcohol use, and access to alcohol), and peer context (descriptive and injunctive norms). Multilevel growth models allow us to conduct the demographic subgroup moderation analysis. Results suggest that these well-studied RPFs explain alcohol involvement to varying degrees, but they explain substantially more variation in alcohol involvement by White adolescents compared with Black adolescents. We find differential patterns of significance and of leading predictors of alcohol involvement as a function of age, race, and gender and the interactions thereof. These results indicate that the prevention field needs to better understand the RPFs affecting minority and high school youth in order to provide a stronger basis for alcohol prevention efforts.
KeywordsAdolescent Alcohol Trajectories Subgroups Tailored interventions
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health through grant funding awarded to Drs. Ennett (R01 DA013459) and Gottfredson (K01 DA035153).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the UNC Institutional Review Board.
All participants in this study consented to participate after parents assented.
The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH.
- Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1): Prentice-Hall NJ.Google Scholar
- Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., & Botvin, E. M. (1995). Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Curran, P. J., McGinley, J. S., Bauer, D. J., Hussong, A. M., Burns, A., Chassin, L., & Zucker, R. (2014). A moderated nonlinear factor model for the development of commensurate measures in integrative data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 214–231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16, 893–926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gottfredson, N. C., Sterba, S. K., & Jackson, K. M. (2017). Explicating the conditions under which multilevel multiple imputation mitigates bias resulting from random coefficient-dependent missing longitudinal data. Prevention Science : the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 18, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0735-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirchi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Newton, N. C., Conrod, P., Teesson, M., & Faggiano, F. (2012). School-based alcohol and other drug prevention. In Drug abuse and addiction in medical illness (pp. 545-560). New York, NY, Springer.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- SAMHSA. (2014). 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. MD.Google Scholar
- SAMHSA. (2016). 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. MD.Google Scholar
- Seffrin, P. (2016) Alcohol use among black and white adolescents: exploring the influence of interracial friendship, the racial composition of peer groups, and communities. The Sociological Quarterly, 53(4), 610–635.Google Scholar
- Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., & Turrisi, R. (2008) Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: state of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics, 121(Supplement 4), S311–S336.Google Scholar
- Vermeulen-Smit, E., Koning, I. M., Verdurmen, J. E., Van der Vorst, H., Engels, R. C., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2012). The influence of paternal and maternal drinking patterns within two-partner families on the initiation and development of adolescent drinking. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 1248–1256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar