The Efficacy of an Event-Specific, Text Message, Personalized Drinking Feedback Intervention
Tailgating drinking prior to a football game is a type of event-specific drinking associated with increased alcohol use and related problems. Personalized drinking feedback interventions (PFI) are efficacious in reducing alcohol use and problems. The current study aimed to advance understanding of event-specific interventions by examining: (1) the efficacy of an event-specific, text message PFI on tailgating alcohol outcomes, and (2) the extent to which intervention effects generalize to “typical” alcohol outcomes at 1-month follow-up. College students (N = 130; 71% female; 92% white) who reported tailgating within the past 30 days and binge drinking when tailgating in the past year completed assessments on tailgating and typical alcohol use. They were randomly assigned to one of two text message conditions delivered on the morning of a home football game: event-specific PFI (TXT PFI) or a control condition. Multilevel modeling examined the association of treatment condition on tailgating and 1-month alcohol outcomes. When tailgating, participants in TXT PFI reported lower estimated peak blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) and consumed less drinks than the control condition. At the 1-month “typical” drinking follow-up, participants in TXT PFI reported lower peak eBAC and fewer alcohol-related problems than the control condition. Perceived tailgating drinking norms were found to statistically mediate the relationship between condition and alcohol outcome at tailgating and 1-month follow-ups. Findings provide preliminary support for the efficacy of an event-specific, text message PFI in reducing both tailgating and typical drinking alcohol outcomes. Event-specific TXT PFI can be used for prevention/intervention of alcohol misuse.
KeywordsEvent-specific Tailgate Text message Personalized feedback Alcohol
Data collection and manuscript preparation for this article was supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant F31AA022830 (PI: Cadigan). Manuscript preparation was also supported in part through National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grants F32AA025263 (PI: Cadigan), T32AA007455 (PI: Larimer), and K05AA017242 (PI: Sher).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar
- Caetano, R., Clark, C. L., & Tam, T. (1998). Alcohol consumption among racial/ethnic minorities: theory and research. Alcohol Research and Health, 22, 233–241.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200.Google Scholar
- Coons, C. J., Howard-Hamilton, M., & Waryold, D. (1995). College sports and fan aggression: Implications for residence hall discipline. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 587–593.Google Scholar
- Fournier, D. A., Skaug, H. J., Ancheta, J., Ianelli, J., Magnusson, A., Maunder, M. N., … & Sibert, J. (2012). AD model builder: Using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optimization Methods and Software, 27, 233–249.Google Scholar
- Kahler, C. W., Hustad, J., Barnett, N. P., Strong, D. R., & Borsari, B. (2008). Validation of the 30-day version of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire for use in longitudinal studies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 611–615.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Larimer, M. E., Lee, C. M., Kilmer, J. R., Fabiano, P. M., Stark, C. B., Geisner, I. M., & … Neighbors, C. (2007). Personalized mailed feedback for college drinking prevention: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 285–293.Google Scholar
- Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., LaBrie, J. W., Atkins, D. C., Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., … & Hodge, K. (2011). Descriptive drinking norms: For whom does reference group matter? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72, 833–843.Google Scholar
- Lee, C. M., Neighbors, C., Lewis, M. A., Kaysen, D., Mittmann, A., Geisner, I. M., & … Larimer, M. E. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of a Spring Break intervention to reduce high-risk drinking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 189–201.Google Scholar
- Leffingwell, T. R., Cooney, N. J., Murphy, J. G., Luczak, S., Rosen, G., Dougherty, D. M., & Barnett, N. P. (2013). Continuous objective monitoring of alcohol use: 21st century measurement using transdermal sensors. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 37, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01869.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muench, F. (2014). The promises and pitfalls of digital technology in its application to alcohol treatment. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36, 131–142.Google Scholar
- Neighbors, C., Atkins, D. C., Lewis, M. A., Lee, C. M., Kaysen, D., Mittmann, A., & … Rodriguez, L. M. (2011). Event-specific drinking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 702–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024051.
- Neighbors, C., Foster, D., Fossos, N., & Lewis, M. A. (2012a). Windows of risk: Event and contexts associated with extreme drinking. In C. Correia, J. Murphy, & N. Barnett (Eds.), College student alcohol abuse: A guide to assessment, intervention and prevention. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- Neighbors, C., Lee, C. M., Atkins, D. C., Lewis, M. A., Kaysen, D., Mittmann, A., Fossos, N., Geisner, I. M., Zheng, C., & Larimer, M. E. (2012b). A randomized controlled trial of event specific prevention strategies for reducing problematic drinking associated with 21st birthday celebrations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 850–862.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google Scholar
- Rutledge, P. C., Park, A., & Sher, K. J. (2008). 21st birthday drinking: Extremely extreme. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 511–516.Google Scholar
- Skaug, H., Fournier, D., Nielsen, A., Magnusson, A., & Bolker, B. (2013). Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.7, 7.Google Scholar
- Suffoletto, B., Kristan, J., Chung, T., Jeong, K., Fabio, A., Monti, P., & Clark, D. B. (2015). An interactive text message intervention to reduce binge drinking in young adults: A randomized controlled trial with 9-month outcomes. PloS One, 10.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, R., Borland, R., Bullen, C., Lin, R. B., McRobbie, H., & Rodgers, A. (2009). Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database System.Google Scholar