Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of a Child Abuse Primary Prevention Strategy for New Mothers

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First Steps (FS) is a brief obstetrics-based primary prevention strategy that aims to strengthen protective factors to prevent child maltreatment. This randomized controlled trial assessed how well FS services aligned with family interests and needs, how FS providers used communication strategies to build partnership with mothers, and the impact of FS on mothers’ parenting knowledge in core content areas and access to services. Mothers completed a baseline survey and were randomly assigned to FS and control conditions (n = 374 and 375, respectively). The parenting education services provided to mothers were assessed by independent participant report immediately postintervention for the full FS group and by analysis of audio-recordings of the FS encounter for a subsample (n = 150). Outcomes were measured at 4 months via maternal survey. Compared to controls at follow-up, FS mothers had significantly higher knowledge scores in some areas but similar access to needed services. Few mothers lacked access to most services at baseline, and FS content was similar to that provided by other hospital personnel. FS providers’ communication style promoted rapport, but providers did not tailor content to mothers’ educational and service access needs. Implications of the findings for similar services are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beebe, S., Casey, R., & Pinto-Martin, J. (1993). Association of reported infant crying and maternal parenting stress. Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, 32, 15–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidmead, C., & Cowley, S. (2005). Evaluating family partnership training in health visitor practice. Community Practice, 78, 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casillas, K., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B., & Garrido, E. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for the Study on Social Policy. (2003). Protective factors literature review: Early care and education programs and the prevention of child abuse and neglect. Retrieved from Center for the Study on Social Policy website: http://www.cssp.org/reform/strengtheningfamilies/resources/body/LiteratureReview.pdf. Accessed June 2018.

  • Cluxton-Keller, F., Burrell, L., Crowne, S., McFarlane, E., Tandon, S. D., Leaf, P. J., & Duggan, A. (2014). Maternal relationship insecurity and depressive symptoms as moderators of home visiting impacts on child outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1430–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counts, J., Buffington, E., Chang-Rios, K., Rasmussen, H., & Preacher, K. (2010). The development and validation of the protective factors survey: A self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 762–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, A. K., Berlin, L. D., Cassidy, J., Burrell, L., & Tandon, S. D. (2009). Examining maternal depression and attachment insecurity as moderators of the impacts of home visiting for at-risk mothers and infants. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 788–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First Steps (2015). Retrieved from https://www.greatstartgeorgia.org/home-visiting-resource-center/first-steps. Accessed June 2018.

  • Georgia Department of Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Section, Office of Family and Community Health, Perinatal Health Unit. (2013) Core requirements and recommended guidelines for designated regional perinatal centers. Retrieved from http://dph.georgia.gov/sites/dph.georgia.gov/files/MCH/Core_Requirements_and_Guidelines._5.16.13_revised.pdf. Accessed June 2018.

  • Home Visiting Research Network. (2013) National Home Visiting Research Agenda.). Retrieved from http://www.hvresearch.org/precision-home-visiting/research-agenda/. Accessed June 2018.

  • Karantzas, G., Feeney, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Is less means more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the attachment style questionnaires. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietz, C. (2009). Establishing evidence for strengths-based interventions? Reflections from social work’s research conference. Social Work, 54, 85–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, J., & Nelson, G. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1127–1149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacPhee, D. (1981). Manual for the knowledge of infant development inventory (Unpublished manuscript). Wilmington: University of North Carolina.

  • McCurdy, K., & Daro, D. (2001). Parent involvement in family support programs: An integrated theory. Family Relations, 50, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, E., Burrell, L., Crowne, S., Cluxton-Keller, F., Fuddy, L., Leaf, P., & Duggan, A. (2013). Maternal relationship security as a moderator of home visiting impacts on maternal psychosocial functioning. Prevention Science, 14, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, E., Crowne, S. S., Burrell, L., & Duggan, A. (2014). Home visiting service delivery and outcomes for depressed mothers. Zero to Three, 34, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, J., Dauber, S., & Leiferman, J. (2006). Individual and combined effects of postpartum depression in mothers and fathers on parenting behavior. Pediatrics, 118, 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protective Factors Survey. (2004). Retrieved from http://friendsnrc.org/protective-factors-survey. Accessed June 2018.

  • Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repucci, N., Britner, P., & Woolard, J. (Eds.). (1997). Preventing abuse and neglect through parent education. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. (1993). The Roter method of interaction process analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R., Kroenke, K., Williams, J., & Lowe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, J., & Amaya-Jackson, L. (2008). Understanding the behavioral and emotional consequences of child abuse. Pediatrics, 122, 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, S., Parillo, K., Mercer, C., Keefer, M., & Duggan, A. (2008). Engagement in paraprofessional home visitation. Women's Health Issues, 18, 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’sBureau. (2011). Child Maltreatment. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-datatechnology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment. Accessed June 2018.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children'sBureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2003). Emerging practices in the prevention of child abuse and neglect. Retrieved from http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/emerging_practices_report.pdf. Accessed June 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is the product of strong partnerships with leaders of Prevent Child Abuse Georgia, the Georgia Governor’s Office for Children and Families, the Center for Family Research at the University of Georgia, and First Steps local sites statewide. Special thanks go to Carole Steele, Marcia Wessels, Anita Brown, and Lynda Brown.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was funded by Grant 90CA1784 from the Office of Child Abuse and Neglect, Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay M. G. O’Neill.

Ethics declarations

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Study methods were approved by the institutional review boards of the Johns Hopkins University and participating hospitals prior to implementing the study. We secured written informed consent from all First Steps mothers and providers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, K.M.G., Cluxton-Keller, F., Burrell, L. et al. Impact of a Child Abuse Primary Prevention Strategy for New Mothers. Prev Sci 21, 4–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0925-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0925-2

Keywords

Navigation