Abstract
This study tests a theoretical cascade model in which multiple dimensions of facilitator delivery predict indicators of participant responsiveness, which in turn lead to improvements in targeted program outcomes. An effectiveness trial of the 10-session New Beginnings Program for divorcing families was implemented in partnership with four county-level family courts. This study included 366 families assigned to the intervention condition who attended at least one session. Independent observers provided ratings of program delivery (i.e., fidelity to the curriculum and process quality). Facilitators reported on parent attendance and parents’ competence in home practice of program skills. At pretest and posttest, children reported on parenting and parents reported child mental health. We hypothesized effects of quality on attendance, fidelity and attendance on home practice, and home practice on improvements in parenting and child mental health. Structural Equation Modeling with mediation and moderation analyses were used to test these associations. Results indicated quality was significantly associated with attendance, and attendance moderated the effect of fidelity on home practice. Home practice was a significant mediator of the links between fidelity and improvements in parent-child relationship quality and child externalizing and internalizing problems. Findings provide support for fidelity to the curriculum, process quality, attendance, and home practice as valid predictors of program outcomes for mothers and fathers. Future directions for assessing implementation in community settings are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised behavior profile. Stowe: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..
Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale. In D. H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 33–48). St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
Barrera, M., Berkel, C., & Castro, F. G. (2017). Directions for the advancement of culturally adapted preventive interventions: Local adaptations, engagement, and sustainability. Prevention Science, 18, 640–648.
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33.
Berkel, C., Murry, V. M., Roulston, K. J., & Brody, G. H. (2013). Understanding the art and science of implementation in the SAAF efficacy trial. Health Education, 113, 297–323.
Berkel, C., Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Brown, C. H., Gallo, C. G., Chiapa, A., Mauricio, A. M., & Jones, S. (2016). “Home practice is the program:” Parents’ practice of program skills as predictors of outcomes in the new beginnings program effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, online first.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
Clarke, A. T., Marshall, S. A., Mautone, J. A., Soffer, S. L., Jones, H. A., Costigan, T. E., Patterson, A., Jawad, A. F., & Power, T. J. (2015). Parent attendance and homework adherence predict response to a family–school intervention for children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 58–67.
Coatsworth, J. D., Duncan, L. G., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Retaining ethnic minority parents in a preventive intervention: The quality of group process. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 367–389.
Cusack, J., Deane, F. P., Wilson, C. J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2006). Emotional expression, perceptions of therapy, and help-seeking intentions in men attending therapy services. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 69–82.
Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.
Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
Eames, C., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Hughes, J. C., Jones, K., Martin, P., & Bywater, T. (2008). The leader observation tool: A process skills treatment fidelity measure for the incredible years parenting programme. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34, 391–400.
Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005). Evaluating fidelity: Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behavior Therapy, 36, 3–13.
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.
Gottfredson, D., Kumpfer, K., Polizzi-Fox, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P., & Vilmenay, M. (2006). The strengthening Washington D.C. families project: A randomized effectiveness trial of family-based prevention. Prevention Science, 7, 57–74.
Hogue, A., Liddle, H. A., & Rowe, C. (1996). Treatment adherence process research in family therapy: A rationale and some practical guidelines. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 33, 332–345.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Kazantzis, N., Deane, F. P., & Ronan, K. R. (2004). Assessing compliance with homework assignments: Review and recommendations for clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 627–641.
Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C., Powell, N., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2009). Dissemination of the coping power program: Importance of intensity of counselor training. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 77, 397–409.
Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2012). Mplus, Version 7.1. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
NRC/IOM. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, D.C.: NRC/IOM.
Orrell-Valente, J. K., Pinderhughes, E. E., Valente, E., & Laird, R. D. (1999). If it's offered, will they come? Influences on parents’ participation in a community-based conduct problems prevention program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 753–783.
Riggs, N. R., Elfenbaum, P., & Pentz, M. A. (2006). Parent program component analysis in a drug abuse prevention trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 66–72.
Ros, R., Hernandez, J., Graziano, P. A., & Bagner, D. M. (2016). Parent training for children with or at risk for developmental delay: The role of parental homework completion. Behavior Therapy, 47, 1–13.
Sandler, I. N., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., Jones, S., Mauricio, A. M., Tein, J.-Y., & Winslow, E. (2016). Effectiveness trial of the new beginnings program (NBP) for divorcing and separating parents: Translation from an experimental prototype to an evidence-based community service. In M. Israelashvili & J. L. Romano (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of international prevention science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandler, I. N., Gunn, H., Mazza, G., Tein, J.-Y., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., Jones, S., & Porter, M. M. (2017). Effects of a program to promote high quality parenting by divorced and separated fathers. Prevention Science, online first, 1-11.
Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s report of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424.
Schoenfelder, E., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., & Ayers, T. S. (2012). Responsiveness to the family bereavement program: What predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict? Prevention Science, 14, 545–556.
Schoenwald, S. K., Garland, A. F., Chapman, J. E., Frazier, S. L., Sheidow, A. J., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2011). Toward the effective and efficient measurement of implementation fidelity. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 38, 32–43.
Soper, D. (2006-2011). Interaction v.1.7. Retrieved from danielsoper.com/Interaction/free.aspx
Stevenson, M. M., Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M., & Votruba, A. M. (2013). Fathers, divorce, and child custody. In N. J. Cabrera & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 379–396). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Tofighi, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700.
Triemstra, K. T., Niec, L. N., Peer, S. O., & Christian-Brandt, A. S. (2016). The influence of conventional masculine gender role norms on parental attitudes toward seeking psychological services for children. Psychology of Men & Masculinity.
West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Todd, M. (1993). Probing the effects of individual components in multiple component prevention programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 571–605.
Wolchik, S., Sandler, I., Weiss, L., & Winslow, E. (2007). New beginnings: An empirically-based program to help divorced mothers promote resilience in their children. In J. M. Briesmeister & C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Handbook of parent training: Helping parents prevent and solve problem behaviors (3rd ed., pp. 25–62). Hoboken: John Wiley.
Funding
Support was provided by R01DA026874 (Sandler), R01DA033991 (Berkel & Mauricio), and competitive funding from the Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology (Ce-PIM), P30-DA027828 (Brown/Berkel), and Diversity Supplement R01DA033991-03S1 (Berkel/Gallo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Sandler and Wolchik are the developers of the NBP and have an LLC that trains providers to deliver the program. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Arizona State University’s IRB and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berkel, C., Mauricio, A.M., Sandler, I.N. et al. The Cascading Effects of Multiple Dimensions of Implementation on Program Outcomes: a Test of a Theoretical Model. Prev Sci 19, 782–794 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0855-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0855-4