Abstract
We examined attendance trajectories among mothers and fathers in the effectiveness trial of the New Beginnings Program, a parenting-focused prevention program for divorced and separated parents. We also investigated attendance trajectory class differences on two sets of pretest covariates: one set previously linked to participation in programs not specifically targeting divorced parents (i.e., sociodemographics, perceived parenting skills, child problem behaviors, parent psychological distress) and another that might be particularly salient to participation in the context of divorce (i.e., interparental conflict, level of parent-child contact, previous marital status to the ex-spouse). For mothers and fathers, results supported four attendance trajectory classes: (1) non-attenders (NA), (2) early dropouts (ED), (3) declining attenders (DA), and (4) sustained attenders (SA). In the final model testing multiple covariates simultaneously, mothers who were EDs and DAs were more likely to be Latina than SAs, and EDs reported more interparental conflict than SAs. Mother trajectory groups did not differ on parenting skills, child problem behavior, or mother-child contact in the final or preliminary models. In the final model for fathers, EDs rated their children higher on externalizing than DAs, had less contact with their children than DAs and NAs, and reported less distress than SAs. Father trajectory groups did not differ on fathers’ age, ethnicity, income, perceived parenting skills, or interparental conflict in the final or preliminary models. Results highlight qualitatively distinct latent classes of mothers and fathers who disengage from a parenting intervention at various points. We discuss implications for intervention engagement strategies and translational science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because very few non-Latino parents reported races other than White (16 fathers and 23 mothers) and we could not justify hypotheses about this heterogeneous subsample of parents, we tested the sociodemographic covariates while including and excluding these parents. The results reported are based on the full sample because excluding non-Latino parents who reported races other than White did not appreciably change the results.
We chose to reduce the number of covariates entered into the final model, though we could have entered all 12 covariates simultaneously or interpreted the results from the models testing conceptually-related covariates (see Tables B1 and B2 in the online appendix). Although we developed hypotheses about the attendance classes and covariates related to the attendance classes, the analyses reported in this paper are largely exploratory. The formation of attendance classes was data-driven, and we tested several covariates potentially related to the attendance classes because very little research focuses on father initiation and retention in parenting interventions.
References
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5–14.
Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1269–1287.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes: No. 21.
Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in a parent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science, 12, 126–138.
Barnes, H., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent-adolescent communication scale. In D. H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 33–48). St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bollen, K. A. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cancian, M., Meyer, D. R., Brown, P. R., & Cook, S. T. (2014). Who gets custody now? Dramatic changes in children’s living arrangements after divorce. Demography, 51, 1381–1396. doi:10.1007/s13524-014-0307-8.
Coatsworth, J. D., Duncan, L. G., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Patterns of retention in a preventive intervention with ethnic minority families. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 171–193.
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232.
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress (Vol. 13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Mauricio, A. M., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., Meza, C. M., Dumka, L. E., Germán, M., & Genalo, M. T. (2007). Engaging Mexican origin families in a school-based preventive intervention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 521–546.
Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E., Egri, G., & Mendelsohn, F. S. (1980). Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology: Measures for use in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1229–1236.
Domenech Rodriguez, M. M., Donovick, M. R., & Crowley, S. L. (2009). Parenting styles in a cultural context: Observations of “protective parenting” in first-generation Latinos. Family Process, 48, 195–210.
Fabiano, G. A. (2007). Father participation in behavioral parent training for ADHD: Review and recommendations for increasing inclusion and engagement. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 683–693.
Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2009). Translational research in action: Implementation of the communities that care prevention system in 12 communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(7), 809-829.
Falicov, C. J. (2009). Commentary: On the wisdom and challenges of culturally attuned treatments for Latinos. Family Process, 48, 292–309.
Farmer, A. Y., & Lee, S. K. (2011). The effects of parenting stress, perceived mastery, and maternal depression on parent–child interaction. Journal of Social Service Research, 37, 516–525.
Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.
Gopalan, G., Goldstein, L., Klingenstein, K., Sicher, C., Blake, C., & McKay, M. M. (2010). Engaging families into child mental health treatment: Updates and special considerations. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 182–196.
Gross, D., Julion, W., & Fogg, L. (2001). What motivates participation and dropout among low-income urban families of color in a prevention intervention? Family Relations, 50, 246–254.
Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1992). Assessing marital conflict from the child’s perspective: The Children’s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale. Child Development, 63, 558–572.
Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography, 43, 53–77.
Jensen, E., Janes, S., Boyce, W. T., & Hartnett, S. A. (1983). The Family Routines Inventory: Development and validation. Social Science and Medicine, 17, 201–211.
Kazdin, A. E., Holland, L., Crowley, M., & Breton, S. (1997). Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale: Evaluation and validation in the context of child outpatient treatment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 1051–1062.
Kitzmann, K. M., & Cohen, R. (2003). Parents’ versus children’s perceptions of interparental conflict as predictors of children’s friendship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 689–700.
Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). (2004). The role of the father in child development. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Leon, K. (2003). Risk and protective factors in young children’s adjustment to parental divorce: A review of the research. Family Relations, 52, 258–270.
Leszcz, M., & Yalom, I. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (2007). The American family and family economics (No. w12908). National Bureau of Economic: Research.
Maldonado, S. (2005). Beyond economic fatherhood: Encouraging divorced fathers to parent. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153, 921–1009.
Mauricio, A. M., Tein, J.-Y., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., & Dumka, L. E. (2016). Attendance patterns and links to non-response on child report of internalizing among Mexican-Americans randomized to a universal preventive intervention. Prevention Science. Advance online publication.
Mauricio, A. M., Tein, J.-Y., Gonzales, N. A., Millsap, R. E., Dumka, L. E., & Berkel, C. (2014). Participation patterns among Mexican–American parents enrolled in a universal intervention and their association with child externalizing outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 370–383.
Melli, M. S., & Brown, P. R. (2008). Exploring a new family form—the shared time family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 22, 231–269.
Menning, C. L. (2006). Nonresident fathering and school failure. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1356-1382.
Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. (2006). A review of parental engagement in parenting interventions and strategies to promote it. Journal of Children’s Services, 1, 29–40.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: CA: Muthén and Muthén.
Oregon Social Learning, C. O. S. L. (1991). LIFT parent interview (unpublished manual). Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.
Panter-Brick, C., Burgess, A., Eggerman, M., McAllister, F., Pruett, K., & Leckman, J. F. (2014). Practitioner review: Engaging fathers—recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1187–1212.
Perrino, T., Coatsworth, J. D., Briones, E., Pantin, H., & Szapocznik, J. (2001). Initial engagement in parent-centered preventive interventions: A family systems perspective. Journal of Primary Prevention, 22, 21–44.
Prado, G., Pantin, H., Schwartz, S. J., Lupei, N. S., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Predictors of engagement and retention into a parent-centered, ecodevelopmental HIV preventive intervention for Hispanic adolescents and their families. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 874–890.
Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science, 10, 1–12.
Pruett, M. K., Arthur, L. A., & Ebling, R. (2006). The hand that rocks the cradle: Maternal gatekeeping after divorce. Pace Law Review, 27, 709–739.
Roberts, R. E., & Vernon, S. W. (1981). Usefulness of the PERI demoralization scale to screen for psychiatric disorder in a community sample. Psychiatry Research, 5, 183–193.
Sandler, I., Miles, J., Cookston, J., & Braver, S. (2008). Effects of father and mother parenting on children’s mental health in high-and low-conflict divorces. Family Court Review, 46, 282–296.
Sandler, I. N., Schoenfelder, E. N., Wolchik, S. A., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: Lasting effects but uncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299–329.
Sandler, I., Wolchik, S., Winslow, E. B., Mahrer, N. E., Moran, J. A., & Weinstock, D. (2012). Quality of maternal and paternal parenting following separation and divorce. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 85–122). New York: Oxford University Press.
Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children’s report of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36, 413–424.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.
Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Child support and child access: Experiences of divorced and nonmarital families. In J. T. Oldham & M. S. Melli (Eds.), Child support: The next frontier (pp. 69–87). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Snell-Johns, J., Mendez, J. L., & Smith, B. H. (2004). Evidence-based solutions for overcoming access barriers, decreasing attrition, and promoting change with underserved families. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 19–35.
Spoth, R., Clair, S., Greenberg, M., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2007). Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 137.
Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., Fagan, A., Catalano, R. F., Pentz, M. A., Sloboda, Z., Hawkins, J. D., & Society for Prevention Research Type 2 Translational Task Force Members and Contributing Authors. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14, 319–351.
Staudt, M. (2007). Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: Gaps in research and conceptualization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 183–196.
Steiger, J. (1989). Causal modeling: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: Systat.
Tein, J. Y., Sandler, I. N., & Zautra, A. J. (2000). Stressful life events, psychological distress, coping, and parenting of divorced mothers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 27.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.
Winslow, E. B., Bonds, D., Wolchik, S., Sandler, I., & Braver, S. (2009). Predictors of enrollment and retention in a preventive parenting intervention for divorced families. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 151–172.
Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Mahrer, N. E., Millsap, R. E., Winslow, E., Vélez, C., Porter, M. M., Luecken, L. J., & Reed, A. (2013). Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial of a preventive intervention for divorced families: Effects on mental health and substance use outcomes in young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 660–673.
Wolchik, S. A., West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Coatsworth, D., Lengua, L., Weiss, L., Anderson, E. R., Greene, S. M., & Griffin, W. A. (2000). An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 843–856.
Wong, J. J., Roubinov, D. S., Gonzales, N. A., Dumka, L. E., & Millsap, R. E. (2013). Father enrollment and participation in a parenting intervention: Personal and contextual predictors. Family Process, 52, 440–454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Development and evaluation of the New Beginnings Program (NBP), including the data collected and used in this study, were supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse grant R01 DA026874.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
Drs. Sandler and Wolchik are the developers of the NBP; Drs. Mauricio and Berkel have a grant (R01DA033991) to study implementation of the NBP; Drs. Sandler, Wolchik, Tein, Berkel, and Winslow were involved in the evaluation of the effectiveness of the NBP program. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All study procedures and measures were reviewed and approved by the Arizona State University Institutional Review Board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study and assent was obtained from minors included in the study.
Additional information
This study was supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse grant R01 DA026874.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 31 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mauricio, A.M., Mazza, G.L., Berkel, C. et al. Attendance Trajectory Classes Among Divorced and Separated Mothers and Fathers in the New Beginnings Program. Prev Sci 19, 620–629 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0783-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0783-3