Prevention Science

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 879–887 | Cite as

Prevention 2.0: Targeting Cyberbullying @ School

  • Ralf Wölfer
  • Anja Schultze-Krumbholz
  • Pavle Zagorscak
  • Anne Jäkel
  • Kristin Göbel
  • Herbert Scheithauer


Although cyberbullying is characterized by worrying prevalence rates and associated with a broad range of detrimental consequences, there is a lack of scientifically based and evaluated preventive strategies. Therefore, the present study introduces a theory-based cyberbullying prevention program (Media Heroes; German original: Medienhelden) and evaluates its effectiveness. In a pretest–posttest design (9-month interval), schools were asked to randomly assign their participating classes to either control or intervention group. Longitudinal data were available from 593 middle school students (M Age = 13.3 years, 53 % girls) out of 35 classes, who provided information on cyberbullying behavior as well as socio-demographic and psychosocial variables. While the present results revealed worrying prevalence rates of cyberbullying in middle school, multilevel analyses clearly demonstrate the program’s effectiveness in reducing cyberbullying behavior within intervention classes in contrast to classes of the control group. Hence, this study presents a promising program which evidentially prevents cyberbullying in schools.


Cyberbullying Prevention Evaluation Adolescents School 



This research was supported by the DAPHNE III Program to combat violence against children, young persons, and women, funded by the European Commission (action no. JLS/2008/DAP3/AG/1211-30-CE-0311025/00-69; Cyberbullying in Adolescence: Investigation and Intervention in Six European Countries).


  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 387–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1, 15–33.Google Scholar
  6. Brighi, A., Ortega, R., Pyzalski, J., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., Tsorbatzoudis, C., et al. (2012). European cyberbullying intervention project questionnaire—ECIPQ. Unpublished questionnaire, University of Bologna.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Rey, R., Elipe, P., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2012). Bullying and cyberbullying: Overlapping and predictive value of the co-occurrence. Psicothema, 24, 608–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213.Google Scholar
  10. Harden, A., Oakley, A., & Oliver, S. (2001). Peer-delivered health promotion for young people: A systematic review of different study designs. Health Education Journal, 60, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 59–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  14. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Juvoven, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Bullying experiences in cyberspace. The Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamsfuss, S. M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Boehnke, K. (1990). Empathie und motive prosozialen Handelns [Empathy and motives of prosocial behavior]. Berlin: Freie Universität.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olweus, D. (2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Roberto, A. J., & Eden, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Aggressive communication in a digital age. In T. Avtgis & A. S. Rancer (Eds.), Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research (pp 198–216). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Jäkel, A., Schultze, M., & Scheithauer, H. (2012). Emotional and behavioural problems in the context of cyberbullying: A longitudinal study among German adolescents. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2010). Cyberbullying unter Kindern und Jugendlichen. Ein Forschungsüberblick [Cyberbullying among children and adolescents. A literature review]. Psychosozial, 33, 79–90.Google Scholar
  27. Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Zagorscak, P., Siebenbrock, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2012). Medienhelden: Unterrichtsmanual zur Förderung von Medienkompetenz und Prävention von Cybermobbing [Media Heroes: Manual for fostering media competencies and preventing cybermobbing]. München: Reinhardt.Google Scholar
  28. Sinclair, K. O., Bauman, S., Poteat, V. P., Koenig, B., & Russell, S. T. (2012). Cyber and bias-based harassment: Associations with academic, substance use, and mental health problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 521–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Snakenborg, J., Van Acker, R., & Gable, R. A. (2011). Cyberbullying: Prevention and intervention to protect our children and youth. Preventing School Failure, 55, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M., & Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suzuki, K., Asaga, R., Sourander, A., Hoven, C. W., & Mandell, D. (2012). Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 24, 27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wang, J., Nansel, T. R., & Iannotti, R. J. (2011). Cyber and traditional bullying: Differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 415–417.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ybarra, M. L., Boyd, D., Korchmaros, J. D., & Oppenheim, J. (2012). Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 53–58.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308–1316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Wölfer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anja Schultze-Krumbholz
    • 1
  • Pavle Zagorscak
    • 1
  • Anne Jäkel
    • 1
  • Kristin Göbel
    • 1
  • Herbert Scheithauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Science and PsychologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations