Prevention Science

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 493–503 | Cite as

Mentoring Early-Career Preventionists: Current Views from Mentors and Protégés

  • Marie-Hélène Véronneau
  • Jessica Duncan Cance
  • Ty A. Ridenour


In prevention science, much of the training occurs outside of a formal graduate program and mentorship is invaluable to early-career individuals. A sample of the Society for Prevention Research (SPR) membership (N = 97) from a wide range of career levels completed an online questionnaire in spring 2010. Almost 20% identified as mentors, 32% as protégés, and 49% as both a mentor and a protégé. Most mentoring relationships were established in graduate school, but professional organizations such as SPR facilitated nearly one in five mentoring relationships. Qualitative results suggested that participants value their professional organization’s support of mentoring and would support initiatives to increase mentoring relationships specifically among SPR members. Although all mentor functions and protégé responsibilities were rated as important, professional support was the highest ranked mentor function and taking initiative the highest ranked protégé responsibility. Additionally, the qualitative results revealed that interpersonal skills and commitment to the mentoring process were seen as key to positive mentoring relationships. We also found that formal documentation of mentoring agreements was rare and a slight preference for a match on gender or ethnicity was observed for protégés from nondominant groups. The discussion includes implications for individuals and implications for promoting high-quality mentoring within professional organizations.


Mentorship Training Prevention science 


  1. Allen, T. D. (2007). Mentoring relationships from the perspective of the mentor. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 123–147). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., & Burroughs, S. M. (1997). The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 70–89. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–136. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association Women’s Programs Office. (2006). Women in the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Baugh, S. G., & Fagenson-Eland, E. A. (2007). Formal mentoring programs: A “poor cousin” to informal relationships? In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 249–271). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Busch, J. W. (1985). Mentoring in graduate schools of education: Mentors’ perceptions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 257–265. doi: 10.2307/1162843.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, C. D. (2007). Best practices for student–faculty mentoring programs. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 325–343). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, T. A., & Campbell, D. E. (1997). Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38, 727–742. doi: 10.1023/A:1024911904627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, R. A., Harden, S. L., & Johnson, W. B. (2000). Mentor relationships in clinical psychology doctoral training: Results of a national survey. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 262–268. doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronan-Hillix, T., Gensheimer, L. K., Cronan-Hillix, W. A., & Davidson, W. S. (1986). Students’ views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 123–127. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1303_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dansky, K. H. (1996). The effect of group mentoring on career outcomes. Group and Organization Management, 21, 5–21. doi: 10.1177/1059601196211002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eby, L. T., & Lockwood, A. (2005). Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 441–458. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eddy, J. M., Martinez, C., Morgan-Lopez, A., Smith, P., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Diversifying the ranks of prevention scientists through a community collaborative approach to education. Prevention and Treatment, 5, no pagination specified. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.53a
  14. Eddy, J. M., Smith, P., Brown, C. H., & Reid, J. B. (2005). A survey of prevention science training: Implications for educating the next generation. Prevention Science, 6, 59–71. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-1253-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forehand, R. L. (2008). The art and science of mentoring in psychology: A necessary practice to ensure our future. American Psychologist, 63, 744–755. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (1995). Supervisory mentoring by advisers: Relationships with doctoral student potential, productivity, and commitment. Personnel Psychology, 48, 537–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01769.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollingsworth, M. A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counseling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 324–330. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.49.3.324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, V. A., Palepu, A., Szalacha, L., Caswell, C., Carr, P. L., & Inui, T. (2003). “Having the right chemistry”: A qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 78, 328–334. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200303000-00020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jayakumar, U. M., Howard, T. C., Allen, W. R., & Han, J. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 538–563. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, W. B. (2007). Student–faculty mentorship outcomes. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 189–210). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, W. B., Rose, G., & Schlosser, L. Z. (2007). Student–faculty mentoring: Theoretical and methodological issues. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 49–69). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Kelly, S., & Schweitzer, J. H. (1999). Mentoring within a graduate school setting. College Student Journal, 33, 130–148.Google Scholar
  23. Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  24. Monroe, K. R., & Chiu, W. F. (2010). Gender equality in the academy: The pipeline problem. PS: Political Science and Politics, 43, 303–308. doi: 10.1017/S1537592708080572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mullen, C. A. (2007). Naturally occurring student–faculty mentoring relationships: A literature review. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 119–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Paglis, L. L. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47, 451–476. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ragins, B. R. (2007). Diversity and workplace mentoring relationships: A review and positive social capital approach. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 281–300). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 529–550. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tenenbaum, H. R., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 326–341. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yetter, G., & Capaccioli, K. (2010). Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 266–272. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Hélène Véronneau
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jessica Duncan Cance
    • 2
  • Ty A. Ridenour
    • 3
  1. 1.Child and Family CenterUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of EducationThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  3. 3.Center for Education and Drug Abuse Research, School of PharmacyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations