Affective Antecedents of the Perceived Effectiveness of Antidrug Advertisements: An Analysis of Adolescents’ Momentary and Retrospective Evaluations
Perceived message effectiveness is often used as a diagnostic tool to determine whether a health message is likely to be successful or needs modification before use in an intervention. Yet, published research on the antecedents of perceived effectiveness is scarce and, consequently, little is known about why a message is perceived to be effective or ineffective. The present study’s aim was to identify and test the affective antecedents of perceived effectiveness of antidrug television messages in a sample of 190 adolescents in the 15–19 year age range. Factor-analytical tests of retrospective message evaluation items suggested two dimensions of perceived effectiveness, one that contained items such as convincingness whereas the other contained pleasantness items. Using retrospective data as well as real time valence and arousal ratings, we found that arousal underlies perceived convincingness and valence underlies perceived pleasantness. The results indicated activation of appetitive and defensive motivational systems, which suggests a clear motivational component to the concept of perceived message effectiveness.
KeywordsPerceived message effectiveness Drug use prevention Arousal Valence
- Bolls, P.D., Lang, A., & Potter, R.F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28, 627–651.Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Derzon, J. H., & Lipsey, M. W. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes and behavior. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 231–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., Triandis, H. C., Kanfer, F. H., Becker, M. H., Middlestadt, S. E., & Eichler, A. (2001). Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. In A. Baum, T. R. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key Findings, 2007 (NIH Publication No. 08–6418). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 693–708). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Office of the Law Revision Counsel (2009). 21 USC Chapter 22—National Drug Control Policy. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/21C22.txt.
- Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Getting a line on print ads. Journal of Advertising, 37, 63–74.Google Scholar
- Schimmack, U., & Crites, S. L. (2005). The structure of affect. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 397–435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, N., & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009). National survey on drug use and health, 2008 [Data file]. Retrieved from www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/SAMHDA/studies/26701.
- U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2009 Summary Tables (2010). Generated by Marco Yzer; using American FactFinder; <http://factfinder.census.gov>; (12 December 2010).
- Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar