Abstract
Perceived message effectiveness is often used as a diagnostic tool to determine whether a health message is likely to be successful or needs modification before use in an intervention. Yet, published research on the antecedents of perceived effectiveness is scarce and, consequently, little is known about why a message is perceived to be effective or ineffective. The present study’s aim was to identify and test the affective antecedents of perceived effectiveness of antidrug television messages in a sample of 190 adolescents in the 15–19 year age range. Factor-analytical tests of retrospective message evaluation items suggested two dimensions of perceived effectiveness, one that contained items such as convincingness whereas the other contained pleasantness items. Using retrospective data as well as real time valence and arousal ratings, we found that arousal underlies perceived convincingness and valence underlies perceived pleasantness. The results indicated activation of appetitive and defensive motivational systems, which suggests a clear motivational component to the concept of perceived message effectiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Prior experiences with marijuana, an illicit substance, conceivably affect judgments not only of ads that target marijuana but ads that target other illicit substances as well. A multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that at least in our data prior marijuana use (users, non-users) and the ad’s target drug (marijuana, other) did not interact to explain ad evaluations (η2 ≤ .003). However, the generalizability of this result is limited to our sample and pool of ads, and the possibility remains that experiences unique to marijuana use can produce judgments of anti-marijuana ads that do not generalize to ads that target other substances.
References
Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M., & Padgett, D. (1997). Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements. The integration of moment-to-moment responses into overall judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 219–232.
Beck, K. H., & Frankel, A. (1981). A conceptualization of threat communications and preventive health behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 204–217.
Biener, L. (2000). Adult and youth responses to the Massachusetts anti-tobacco television campaign. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 6, 40–44.
Bless, H., Mackie, D. M., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Mood effects on encoding and judgmental processes in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585–595.
Bolls, P.D., Lang, A., & Potter, R.F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28, 627–651.
Bradley, M. M. (2009). Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology, 46, 1–11.
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276–298.
Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404.
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Derzon, J. H., & Lipsey, M. W. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes and behavior. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 231–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion. Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27, 461–495.
Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007a). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488.
Dillard, J. P., Weber, K., & Vail, R. G. (2007b). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. The Journal of Communication, 57, 613–631.
Fishbein, M., Triandis, H. C., Kanfer, F. H., Becker, M. H., Middlestadt, S. E., & Eichler, A. (2001). Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. In A. Baum, T. R. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 238–245.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55.
Hornik, R., Jacobsohn, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2008). Effects of the national youth anti-drug media campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 2229–2236.
Hullett, C. R., & Boster, F. J. (2001). Matching messages to the values underlying value-expressive and social-adjustive attitudes: Reconciling an old theory with a contemporary measurement approach. Communication Monographs, 68, 133–153.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key Findings, 2007 (NIH Publication No. 08–6418). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Kahneman, D. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 693–708). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. The Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70.
Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. The Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80.
Lang, A., Chung, Y., Lee, S., Schwartz, N., & Shin, M. (2005a). It’s an arousing, fast-paced kind of world: The effects of age and sensation seeking on the information processing of substance-abuse PSAs. Media Psychology, 7, 421–454.
Lang, A., Chung, Y., Lee, S., & Zhao, X. (2005b). It’s the product: Do risky products compel attention and elicit arousal in media users? Health Communication, 17, 283–300.
Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Ruparel, K., Hakun, J. G., Busch-Winokur, S., Holloway, M. B., et al. (2009). Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads. Neuroimage, 46, 219–225.
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processing and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 580–604.
Luciana, M., Collins, P. F., Olson, E. A., & Schissel, A. M. (2009). Tower of London performance in healthy adolescents: The development of planning skills and associations with self-reported inattention and impulsivity. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34, 461–475.
Mitchell, M. M. (2000). Able but not motivated? The relative effects of happy and sad moods on persuasive message processing. Communication Monographs, 67, 215–226.
Office of the Law Revision Counsel (2009). 21 USC Chapter 22—National Drug Control Policy. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/21C22.txt.
Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1–18.
Poels, K., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Getting a line on print ads. Journal of Advertising, 37, 63–74.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 116, 3–8.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional epdisodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805–819.
Schimmack, U., & Crites, S. L. (2005). The structure of affect. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 397–435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schwartz, N., & Clore, G.L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.
Stead, M., Tagg, S., MacKintosh, A. M., & Eadie, D. R. (2005). Development and evaluation of a mass media theory of planned behaviour intervention to reduce speeding. Health Education Research, 20, 36–50.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009). National survey on drug use and health, 2008 [Data file]. Retrieved from www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/SAMHDA/studies/26701.
U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2009 Summary Tables (2010). Generated by Marco Yzer; using American FactFinder; <http://factfinder.census.gov>; (12 December 2010).
Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford.
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349.
Yzer, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Fishbein, M., Hornik, R., Sayeed, S., & Ahern, R. K. (2004). The role of distal variables in behavior change: Effects of adolescents’ risk for marijuana use on intention to use marijuana. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1229–1250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by Grant 1R21DA024430-01 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yzer, M.C., Vohs, K.D., Luciana, M. et al. Affective Antecedents of the Perceived Effectiveness of Antidrug Advertisements: An Analysis of Adolescents’ Momentary and Retrospective Evaluations. Prev Sci 12, 278–288 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0212-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0212-y