Prevention Science

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 172–184 | Cite as

The Effects of Project ALERT One Year Past Curriculum Completion

  • Chris L. Ringwalt
  • Heddy Kovach Clark
  • Sean Hanley
  • Stephen R. Shamblen
  • Robert L. Flewelling


School-based drug prevention curricula constitute the nation’s most prevalent strategy to prevent adolescent drug use. We evaluated the effects of one such curriculum, Project ALERT, on adolescent substance use. In particular, we sought to determine if a single effect on 30-day alcohol use, noted shortly following the completion of the 2-year program, could be detected 1 year later. We also looked for delayed effects on other outcomes of interest, namely lifetime alcohol use, and 30-day and lifetime use of cigarettes, marijuana, and inhalants. We employed a randomized controlled trial that used school as the unit of assignment. Thirty-four schools with grades 6–8 from 11 states completed the study. Seventy-one Project ALERT instructors taught 11 core lessons to sixth graders and 3 booster lessons to seventh graders. Students were assessed prior to the onset of the intervention, as sixth graders, after the completion of the 2-year curriculum, as seventh graders, and again 1 year later as eighth graders. This paper examines data from the pretest and final posttest. Using hierarchical nonlinear modeling, we found that our earlier effect on 30-day alcohol use did not persist. Further, we continued to find no effects for lifetime alcohol use and both the lifetime and 30-day use of cigarettes, marijuana, and inhalants. Our findings do not support the long-term effectiveness of Project ALERT, when delivered to sixth graders.


Substance use prevention Project ALERT Middle school Randomized controlled trial 


  1. Barber, B. K. & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best Foundation for a Drug Free Tomorrow. (2009a). About Project Highlights: The Project ALERT Curriculum. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from
  3. Best Foundation for a Drug Free Tomorrow. (2009b). About Project Cost and training. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from
  4. Botvin, G. J. & Griffin, K. W. (2003). Drug abuse prevention curricula in schools. In Z. Sloboda & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Handbook of drug abuse prevention: Theory, science, & practice (pp. 45–74). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., Mihalic, S. F., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Life skills training: Blueprints for violence prevention. In D. S. Elliott (Ed.), Blueprints for violence prevention: Book five. Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  6. Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence: Institute of Behavioral Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. (2008). Blueprints for violence prevention. Retrieved August 11, 2008, from
  7. Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, L. & Coleman, J. (2002). The measurement of puberty: A review. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 535–550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, P., MacCoun, R., Muschkin, C., & Vigdor, J. (2008). The negative impacts of starting middle school in sixth grade. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.Google Scholar
  11. Eccles, J. S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. The Future of Children, 9, 30–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellickson, P. L. & Bell, R. M. (1990). Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 247, 1299–1305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & Harrison, E. R. (1993). Changing adolescent propensities to use drugs: Results from Project ALERT. Health Education Quarterly, 20, 227–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & McGuigan, K. (1993). Preventing adolescent drug use: Long-term results of a junior high program. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 856–861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., Thomas, M. A., Robyn, A. E., & Zellman, G. L. (1988). Designing and implementing Project ALERT: A smoking and drug prevention experiment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  16. Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore, D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1830–1836.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellickson, P. L., Miller, L., Robyn, A., Wildflower, L. Z., & Zellman, G. L. (2004). Project ALERT: A drug prevention program for middle grades. Los Angeles: BEST Foundation for a Drug-Free Tomorrow.Google Scholar
  18. Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Galambos, N. L. & Almeida, D. M. (1992). Does parent-adolescent conflict increase in early adolescence? Journal of Marriage & Family, 54, 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Longshore, D. L., Ellickson, P. L., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2004). Modifying pro-drug risk factors in adolescents: Results from Project ALERT. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 318–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hantman, I. & Crosse, C. (2000). Progress in prevention: National study of local education activities under the Safe and Drug-free Schools and Communities Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Planning and Evaluation Service.Google Scholar
  22. Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
  23. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hser, Y.-I., Longshore, D., Brecht, M.-L., & Anglin, M. D. (2005). Studying the natural history of drug use. In Z. Sloboda (Ed.), Epidemiology of drug abuse (pp. 29–43). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jang, S. L. (1999). Age-varying effect of family, school, and peers on delinquency: A multilevel modeling test of interactional theory. Criminology, 37, 643–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Can rehabilitative programs reduce the recidivism of juvenile offenders? An inquiry into the effectiveness of practical programs. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 6, 611–641.Google Scholar
  27. Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA). (1998). Back to school 1998: National survey of American attitudes on substance abuse IV: Teens, teachers and principals. New York: Robert Wood Johnson.Google Scholar
  29. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat 1425 (2002).Google Scholar
  30. Pentz, M. A., Mihalic, S. F., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). The Midwestern Prevention Project: Blueprints for violence prevention. In D. S. Elliott (Ed.), Blueprints for violence prevention series: Book one. Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  31. Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Toomey, T. L., Komro, K. A., Anstine, P. S., et al. (1996). Project Northland: Outcomes of a community wide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 956–965.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pride Surveys. (2002). Pride questionnaire report: 2001–02 National summary, Grades 6 through 12 Retrieved September 19, 2008, from
  33. Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Rimm, S. B. (2005). Growing up too fast: The Rimm report on the secret world of America's middle schoolers. New York: Rodale.Google Scholar
  35. Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science, 3, 257–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ringwalt, C. L., Clark, H. K., Hanley, S., Shamblen, S. R., & Flewelling, R. L. (2009a). Project ALERT: A cluster randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ringwalt, C. L., Vincus, A. A., Hanley, S., Ennett, S., Bowling, J., & Rohrbach, L. A. (2009b). The prevalence of evidence-based drug use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools in 2005. Prevention Science, 10, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Safe and Drug-free Schools Program. (1998). Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Fed Reg, 63, 104.Google Scholar
  39. Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Bonevski, B., Green, L. W., & D'Este, C. (2007). Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 155–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. St. Pierre, T. L., Osgood, D. W., Mincemoyer, C. C., Kaltreider, D. L., & Kauh, T. J. (2005). Results of an independent evaluation of Project ALERT delivered in schools by cooperative extension. Prevention Science, 6, 305–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sussman, S., Rohrbach, L., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Project Towards No Drug Abuse: Blueprints for violence prevention. In D. S. Elliott (Ed.), Blueprints for violence prevention series: Book twelve. Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). United States Census 2000: Questionnaires. Retrieved May 11, 2009, from
  43. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). Common core of data (CCD): Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data [data file]. Available from national center for education statistics web site, from

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris L. Ringwalt
    • 1
  • Heddy Kovach Clark
    • 1
  • Sean Hanley
    • 1
  • Stephen R. Shamblen
    • 2
  • Robert L. Flewelling
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacific Institute for Research and EvaluationChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Institute for Research and EvaluationLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations