Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 139, Issue 1–3, pp 107–121 | Cite as

Changes in the photosynthesis properties and photoprotection capacity in rice (Oryza sativa) grown under red, blue, or white light

  • Saber Hamdani
  • Naveed Khan
  • Shahnaz Perveen
  • Mingnan Qu
  • Jianjun Jiang
  • Govindjee
  • Xin-Guang ZhuEmail author
Original Article
  • 498 Downloads

Abstract

Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of the excited state of chlorophyll a is a major photoprotective mechanism plants utilize to survive under high light. Here, we report the impact of long-term light quality treatment on photosynthetic properties, especially NPQ in rice. We used three LED-based light regimes, i.e., red (648–672 nm), blue (438–460 nm), and “warm” white light (529–624 nm), with the incident photon flux density of 300 µmol photons m−2 s−1, the difference in the absorbed photon flux densities by leaves grown under different light quality being less than 7%. Our results show that blue light, as compared to white light, induced a significant decrease in Fv/Fm, a decreased rate of reduction of P700+ after P700 was completely oxidized; furthermore, blue light also induced higher NPQ with an increased initial speed of NPQ induction, which corresponds to the qE component of NPQ, and a lower maximum quantum yield of PSII, i.e., Y(II). In contrast, rice grown under long-term red light showed decreased Y(II) and increased NPQ, but with no change in Fv/Fm. Furthermore, we found that rice grown under either blue or red light showed decreased transcript abundance of both catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, together with an increased H2O2 content, as compared to rice grown under white light. All these data suggest that even under a moderate incident light level, rice grown under blue or red light led to compromised antioxidant system, which contributed to decreased quantum yield of photosystem II and increased NPQ.

Keywords

Antioxidant system Effective quantum yield of PSII Light quality Non-photochemical quenching of the excited state of chlorophyll a Oryza sativa Quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation in PSII 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDB27020105, CAS-TWAS President’s Fellowship Program, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) strategic leading project on agriculture XDA08020301 and National Basic Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2015CB150104, 2014AA101601, National Science Foundation # C020401. Govindjee thanks the office of Information Technology, Life Sciences, the Department of Plant Biology and the Department of Biochemistry for support.

Author contributions

SH and XZ designed and conducted the research. SH, NK, SP, MQ, and JJ performed research. SH, NK, G, and XZ wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary material

11120_2018_589_MOESM1_ESM.docx (713 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 713 KB)
11120_2018_589_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 KB)

References

  1. Alboresi A, DallOsto L, Aprile A, Carillo P, Roncaglia E, Cattivelli L, Bassi R (2011) Reactive oxygen species and transcript analysis upon excess light treatment in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana vs a photosensitive mutant lacking zeaxanthin and lutein. BMC Plant Biol 11:62–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asada K (2006) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their function. Plant Physiol 141:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchemin R, Gauthier A, Harnois J, Boisvert S, Govindachary S, Carpentier R (2007) Spermine and spermidine inhibition of photosystem II: disassembly of the oxygen evolving complex and consequent perturbation in electron donation from TyrZ to P680 + and the quinone acceptors QA to QB. Biochim Biophys Acta 1767:905–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belgiol E, Trsková E, Kotabová E, Ewe D, Prášil O, Kaňa R (2018) High light acclimation of Chromera velia points to photoprotective NPQ. Photosynth Res 135:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bian Z, Yang Q, Lib T, Cheng R, Barnetta Y, Lua C (2018) Study of the beneficial effects of green light on lettuce grown under short-term continuous red and blue light-emitting diodes. Physiol Plant. http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/33129
  6. Björkman O, Powles SB (1987) Leaf movement in the shade species Oxalis oregana L I. Response to light level and light quality. Carnegie Inst Wash Year Book 80:59–62Google Scholar
  7. Bukhov NG, Drozdova IS, Bondar VV (1995) Light response curves of photosynthesis in leaves of sun-type and shade-type plants grown in blue or red light. J Photochem Photobiol B 30:39–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cazzaniga S, Osto LD, Kong SG, Wada M, Bassi R (2013) Interaction between avoidance of photon absorption, excess energy dissipation and zeaxanthin synthesis against photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J 76:568–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dall’Osto L, Caffarri S, Bassi R (2005) A mechanism of nonphotochemical energy dissipation, independent from Psbs, revealed by a conformational change in the antenna protein CP26. Plant Cell 17:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daudi A, O’Brien JA (2012) Detection of hydrogen peroxide by DAB staining in Arabidopsis leaves. Bio Protoc 2(18):1–4Google Scholar
  11. Demmig-Adams B, Garab G, Adams WW, Govindjee (eds) (2014) Non-photochemical quenching and energy dissipation in plants, algae and cyanobacteria. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  12. Derks A, Schaven K, Bruce D (2015) Diverse mechanisms for photoprotection in photosynthesis. Dynamic regulation of photosystem II excitation in response to rapid environmental change. Biochim Biophys Acta 1847:468–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eskins K, Jiang CZ, Shibles R (1991) Light-quality and irradiance effects on pigments, light-harvesting proteins and Rubisco activity in a chlorophyll- and light-harvesting-deficient soybean mutant. Physiol Plant 83:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans JR (1989) Partitioning of nitrogen between and within leaves grown under different irradiances. Aust J Plant Physiol 16:533–548Google Scholar
  15. Fratanico A, Tocquin P, Franck F (2016) The chlorophyll a fluorescence induction curve in the green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: further insight into the nature of the P-S-M fluctuation and its relationship with the “low wave” phenomenon sat steady state. Photosynth Res 128:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryer MJ, Oxborough K, Mullineaux PM, Baker NR (2002) Imaging of photo-oxidative stress responses in leaves. J Exp Bot 53:1249–1254Google Scholar
  17. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glick RE, McCauley SW, Gruissem W, Melis A (1986) Light quality regulates expression of choloroplast genes and assembly of photosynthetic membrane complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:4287–4291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant RH (1997) Partitioning of biologically active radiation in plant canopies. Int J Biometeorol 40:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green BR, Durnford DG (1996) The chlorophyll-carotenoid proteins of oxygenic photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:685–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green BR, Parson WW (eds) (2003) Light-harvesting antennas in photosynthesis. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  23. Gyula P, Schäfer E, Nagy F (2003) Light perception and signalling in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamdani S, Carpentier R (2009) Interaction of methylamine with extrinsic and intrinsic subunits of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787:1223–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamdani S, Qu M, Xin CP, Li M, Chu C, Govindjee Zhu XG (2015) Variations between the photosynthetic properties of elite and landrace Chinese rice cultivars revealed by simultaneous measurements of 820 nm transmission signal and chlorophyll a fluorescence induction. J Plant Physiol 177:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hasni I, Hamdani S, Carpentier R (2013) Destabilization of the oxygen evolving complex of photosystem II by Al3+. Photochem Photobiol 89:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Poorter H, Ieperen WV, Harbinson J (2010) Blue light dose–responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J Exp Bot 61:3107–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holm G (1954) Chlorophyll mutations in barley. Acta Agric Sci 4:457–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang W, Tikkanen M, Zhang SB (2018) Photoinhibition of photosystem I in Nephrolepis falciformis depends on reactive oxygen species generated in the chloroplast stroma. Photosynth Res 137:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inada K (1980) Spectral absorption property of pigments in living leaves and its contribution to photosynthesis. Japan Jour Crop Sci 49:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP (2006) Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345:646–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson MP, Davison PA, Ruban AV, Horton P (2008) The xanthophyll cycle pool size controls the kinetics of non-photochemical quenching in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 582:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jung ES, Lee S, Lim SH, Ha SH, Liu KH, Lee CH (2013) Metabolite profiling of the short-term responses of rice leaves (Oryza sativa cv. Ilmi) cultivated under different LED lights and its correlations with antioxidant activities. Plant Sci 210:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kagawa T, Wada M (2000) Blue light-induced chloroplast relocation in Arabidopsis thaliana as analyzed by microbeam irradiation. Plant Cell Physiol 41:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klughammer C, Schreiber U (2008) Complementary PSII quantum yields calculated from simple fluorescence parameters measured by PAM fluorometry and the Saturation Pulse method. PAM Appl Notes 1:27–35Google Scholar
  36. Kodru S, Malavath T, Devadasu E, Nellaepalli S, Stirbet A, Subramanyam R, Govindjee (2015) The slow S to M rise of chlorophyll a fluorescence reflects transitions from state 2 to state 1 in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Photosynth Res 125:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koller D (1990) Light-driven leaf movements. Plant Cell Environ 13:615–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kramer DM, Johnson G, Kiirats O, Edwards GE (2004) New flux parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation fluxes. Photosynth Res 79:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kromdijk J, Glowacka K, Leonelli L, Gabilly ST, Iwai M, Niyogi KK, Long SP (2016) Improving Photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354:857–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leonelli L, Brooks MD, Niyogi KK (2017) Engineering the lutein epoxide cycle into Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:7002–7008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leong TY, Anderson JM (1984) Effect of light quality on the composition and function of thylakoid membranes in Atriplex triangularis. Biochim Biophys Acta 766:533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leong TY, Goodchild DJ, Anderson JM (1985) Effect of light quality on the composition, function, and structure of photosynthetic thylakoid membranes of Asplenium australasicum (Sm.). Hook Plant Physiol 78:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Livak K, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melis A, Spangfort M, Andersson B (1987) Light-absorption and electron-transport balance between photosystem II and photosystem I in spinach chloroplasts. Photochem Photobiol 45:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miyake C, Horiguchi S, Makino A, Shizaki Y, Yamamoto H, Tomizawa KI (2005) Effects of light intensity on cyclic electron flow around PSI and its relationship to non-photochemical quenching of Chl fluorescence in tobacco leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1819–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Möglich A, Yang X, Ayers RA, Moffat K (2010) Structure and function of plant photoreceptors. Ann Review Plant Biol 61:21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Müller P, Li XP, Niyogi KK (2001) Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol 125:1558–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murchie EH, Lawson T (2013) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot 64:3983–3998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nilkens M, Kress E, Lambrev P, Milosalvina Y, Müller M, Holzwarth AR, Jahns P (2010) Identification of a slowly inducible zeaxanthin-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence generated under steady-state conditions in Arabidopsis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niyogi KK (1999) Photoprotection revisited: genetic and molecular approaches. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:333–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norcini JG, Andersen PC, Knox GW (1991) Light intensity influences leaf physiology and plant growth characteristics of Photinia × fraseri. J Am Hort Sci 116:1046–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oguchi R, Douwstara P, Fujita T, Chow WS, Terashima I (2011) Intra-leaf gradients of photoinhibition induced by different color lights: implications for the dual mechanisms of photoinhibition and for the application of conventional chlorophyll fluorometers. New Phytol 191:146–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ohnishi N, Allakhverdiev SI, Takahashi S, Higashi S, Watanabe M, Nishiyama N, Murata N (2005) Two-step mechanism of photodamage to photosystem II: step 1 occurs at the oxygen-evolving complex and step 2 occurs at the photochemical reaction center. Biochemistry 44:8494–8499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ort DR (2001) When there is too much light. Plant Physiol 125:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (2011) Photosystem II fluorescence: slow changes—scaling from the past. J Photochem Photbiol B 104:258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (2014) The non-photochemical quenching of the electronically excited state of chlorophyll a in plants: definitions, timeline, viewpoints. Open questions. In: Demmig B, Adams G, Garab WW, Adams III, Govindjee (eds) Non-photochemical quenching and energy dissipation in plants, algae and cyanobacteria. advances in photosynthesis and respiration including bioenergy and related processes. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  57. Pfündel E, Klughammer C, Schreiber U (2008) Monitoring the effects of reduced PSII antenna size on quantum yields of photosystems I and II using the Dual-PAM-100 measuring system. PAM Appl Notes 1:21–24Google Scholar
  58. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedelman PE (1989) Determination of accurate extraction and simultaneously equation for assaying chlorophyll a and b extracted with different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pospíšil P (2009) Production of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta -Bioenerg 1787:1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pospíšil P (2012) Molecular mechanisms of production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1817:218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pospíšil P, Prasad A (2014) Formation of singlet oxygen and protection against its oxidative damage in photosystem II under abiotic stress. J Photochem Photobiol B 137:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rochaix J (2014) Regulation and dynamics of the light-harvesting system. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruban AV (2018) Light harvesting control in plants. FEBS Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13111 Google Scholar
  64. Rubin AV, Horton P (1999) The xanthophyll cycle modulates the kinetics of nonphotchemical energy dissipation in isolated light harvesting complexes, intact chloroplasts and leaves of spinach. Plant Physiol 119:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sacharz J, Giovagnetti V, Ungerer P, Mastroianni G, Ruban A (2017) The xanthophyll cycle affects reversible PsbS-LHCII interactions to control non-photochemical quenching. Nat Plants 3:16225–16234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schreiber U (2004) Pulse amplitude modulation fluorometry and saturation pulse method: an overview. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. advances in photosynthesis and respiration including bioenergy and related processes. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  67. Senger H, Bauer B (1987) The influence of light quality on adaptation and function of the photosynthetic apparatus. Photochem Photobiol 45:939–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sztatelman O, Waloszek A, Banas AK, Gabrys H (2010) Photoprotective function of chloroplast avoidance movement: in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence study. J Exp Bot 167:709–716Google Scholar
  69. Tian Y, Sacharz J, Ware MA, Zhang H, Ruban AV (2017) Effects of periodic photoinhibitory light exposure on physiology and productivity of Arabidopsis plants grown under low light. J Exp Bot 68:4249–4262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Triantaphylides C, Havaux M (2009) Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci 14:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang Y, Jiang L, Li Y, Chen Q, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Luo Y, Sun B, Wang X, Tang H (2018) Effect of red and blue light on anthocyanin accumulation and differential gene expression in strawberry (Fragaria x anaassa). Molecules 234:820.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu XG, Ort DR, Whitmarsh J, Long SP (2004) The slow reversibility of photosystem II thermal energy dissipation on transfer from high to low light may cause large losses in carbon gain by crop canopies: a theoretical analysis. J Exp Bot 55:1167–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saber Hamdani
    • 1
  • Naveed Khan
    • 2
  • Shahnaz Perveen
    • 1
  • Mingnan Qu
    • 1
  • Jianjun Jiang
    • 1
  • Govindjee
    • 3
  • Xin-Guang Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.National Key Laboratory for Plant Molecular Genetics, Center of Excellence for Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and EcologyChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Max-Planck Partner Institute of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Biochemistry, Department of Plant Biology, and Center of Biophysics and Quantitative BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations