Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 136, Issue 2, pp 229–243 | Cite as

Red shift in the spectrum of a chlorophyll species is essential for the drought-induced dissipation of excess light energy in a poikilohydric moss, Bryum argenteum

  • Yutaka Shibata
  • Ahmed Mohamed
  • Koichiro Taniyama
  • Kentaro Kanatani
  • Makiko Kosugi
  • Hiroshi Fukumura
Original Article

Abstract

Some mosses are extremely tolerant of drought stress. Their high drought tolerance relies on their ability to effectively dissipate absorbed light energy to heat under dry conditions. The energy dissipation mechanism in a drought-tolerant moss, Bryum argenteum, has been investigated using low-temperature picosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The results are compared between moss thalli samples harvested in Antarctica and in Japan. Both samples show almost the same quenching properties, suggesting an identical drought tolerance mechanism for the same species with two completely different habitats. A global target analysis was applied to a large set of data on the fluorescence-quenching dynamics for the 430-nm (chlorophyll-a selective) and 460-nm (chlorophyll-b and carotenoid selective) excitations in the temperature region from 5 to 77 K. This analysis strongly suggested that the quencher is formed in the major peripheral antenna of photosystem II, whose emission spectrum is significantly broadened and red-shifted in its quenched form. Two emission components at around 717 and 725 nm were assigned to photosystem I (PS I). The former component at around 717 nm is mildly quenched and probably bound to the PS I core complex, while the latter at around 725 nm is probably bound to the light-harvesting complex. The dehydration treatment caused a blue shift of the PS I emission peak via reduction of the exciton energy flow to the pigment responsible for the 725 nm band.

Keywords

Non-photochemical quenching Chlorophyll-a Chlorophyll-b Streak camera Decay-associated spectra Target analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kojiro Hara (Akita Prefectural University) for kindly advising us on the access to transcriptome data on B. argenteum. This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15H04356 to Y.S. and No. 24770030 to M. K.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Supplementary material

11120_2017_461_MOESM1_ESM.docx (413 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 413 KB)

References

  1. Ahn TK, Avenson TJ, Ballottari M, Cheng YC, Niyogi KK, Bassi R, Fleming GR (2008) Architecture of a charge-transfer state regulating light harvesting in a plant antenna protein. Science 320:794–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azzabi G, Pinnola A, Betterle N, Bassi R, Alboresi A (2012) Enhancement of non-photochemical quenching in the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens during acclimation to salt and osmotic stress. Plant Cell Physiol 53:1815–1825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Broess K, Trinkunas G, van Hoek A, Croce R, van Amerongen H (2008) Determination of the excitation migration time in photosystem II: consequences for the membrane organization and charge separation parameters. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1777:404–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caffarri S, Kouřil R, Kereïche S, Boekema EJ, Croce R (2009) Functional architecture of higher plant photosystem II supercomplexes. EMBO J 28:3052–3063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Coughlan SJ, Schreiber U (1984) The differential-effects of short-time glutaraldehyde treatments on light-induced thylakoid membrane conformational-changes, proton pumping and electron-transport properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 767:606–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croce R, Zucchelli G, Garlaschi FM, Jennings RC (1998) A thermal broadening study of the antenna chlorophylls in PSI-200, LHCI, and PSI core. BioChemistry 37:17355–17360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Haene SE, Sobotka R, Bučinská L, Dekker JP, Komenda J (2015) Interaction of the PsbH subunit with a chlorophyll bound to histidine 114 of CP47 is responsible for the red 77 K fluorescence of Photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1847:1327–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demmig-Adams B (1990) Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants: a role for the xanthophyll zeaxanthin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1020:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (2000) Photosynthesis: harvesting sunlight safely. Nature 403:371–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gao B, Zhang DY, Li XS, Yang HL, Zhang YM, Wood AJ (2015) De novo transcriptome characterization and gene expression profiling of the desiccation tolerant moss Bryum argenteum following rehydration. Bmc Genomics 16Google Scholar
  11. Gilmore AM, Hazlett TL, Govindjee (1995) Xanthophyll cycle-dependent quenching of photosystem-II chlorophyll-a fluorescence: formation of a quenching complex with a short fluorescence lifetime. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2273–2277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodwin TW (ed) (1976) Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments, 2nd edn. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Goss R, Lepetit B (2015) Biodiversity of NPQ. J Plant Physiol 172:13–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Groot ML, Peterman EJG, Vanstokkum IHM, Dekker JP, Vangrondelle R (1995) Triplet and fluorescing states of the Cp47 antenna complex of photosystem-II studied as a function of temperature. Biophys J 68:281–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall J, Renger T, Müh F, Picorel R, Krausz E (2016) The lowest-energy chlorophyll of photosystem II is adjacent to the peripheral antenna: emitting states of CP47 assigned via circularly polarized luminescence. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1857:1580–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halliwell B (1984) Chloroplast metabolism. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Heber U, Shuvalov VA (2005) Photochemical reactions of chlorophyll in dehydrated photosystem II: two chlorophyll forms (680 and 700 nm). Photosynth Res 84:85–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heber U, Bilger W, Shuvalov VA (2006) Thermal energy dissipation in reaction centres and in the antenna of photosystem II protects desiccated poikilohydric mosses against photo-oxidation. J Exp Bot 57:2993–3006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heber U, Azarkovich M, Shuvalov V (2007) Activation of mechanisms of photoprotection by desiccation and by light: poikilohydric photoautotrophs. J Exp Bot 58:2745–2759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirai M, Yamakawa R, Nishio J, Yamaji T, Kashino Y, Koike H, Satoh K (2004) Deactivation of photosynthetic activities is triggered by loss of a small amount of water in a desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterium, Nostoc commune. Plant Cell Physiol 45:872–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:431–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Honegger R (1998) The Lichen symbiosis: what is so spectacular about it? Lichenologist 30:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ilioaia C, Johnson MP, Horton P, Ruban AV (2008) Induction of Efficient energy dissipation in the isolated light-harvesting complex of photosystem II in the absence of protein aggregation. J Biol Chem 283:29505–29512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Komura M, Shibata Y, Itoh S (2006) A new fluorescence band F689 in photosystem II revealed by picosecond analysis at 4–77 K: function of two terminal energy sinks F689 and F695 in PS II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1757:1657–1668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Komura M, Yamagishi A, Shibata Y, Iwasaki I, Itoh S (2010) Mechanism of strong quenching of photosystem II chlorophyll fluorescence under drought stress in a lichen, Physciella melanchla, studied by subpicosecond fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1797:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kosugi M, Arita M, Shizuma R, Moriyama Y, Kashino Y, Koike H, Satoh K (2009) Responses to desiccation stress in lichens are different from those in their photobionts. Plant Cell Physiol 50:879–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li XP, Gilmore AM, Caffarri S, Bassi R, Golan T, Kramer D, Niyogi KK (2004) Regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting involves intrathylakoid lumen pH sensing by the PsbS protein. J Biol Chem 279:22866–22874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyake H, Komura M, Itoh S, Kosugi M, Kashino Y, Satoh K, Shibata Y (2011) Multiple dissipation components of excess light energy in dry lichen revealed by ultrafast fluorescence study at 5 K. Photosynth Res 110:39–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohamed A, Nagao R, Noguchi T, Fukumura H, Shibata Y (2016) Structure-based modeling of fluorescence kinetics of photosystem II: relation between its dimeric form and photoregulation. J Phys Chem B 120:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Munne-Bosch S (2005) The role of alpha-tocopherol in plant stress tolerance. J Plant Physiol 162:743–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Murakami A (1997) Quantitative analysis of 77K fluorescence emission spectra in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6714 and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with variable PS I/PS II stoichiometries. Photosynth Res 53:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nabe H, Funabiki R, Kashino Y, Koike H, Satoh K (2007) Responses to desiccation stress in bryophytes and an important role of dithiothreitol-insensitive non-photochemical quenching against photoinhibition in dehydrated states. Plant Cell Physiol 48:1548–1557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev SI, Murata N (2006) A new paradigm for the action of reactive oxygen species in the photoinhibition of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1757:742–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pan XW, Li M, Wan T, Wang LF, Jia CJ, Hou ZQ, Zhao XL, Zhang JP, Chang WR (2011) Structural insights into energy regulation of light-harvesting complex CP29 from spinach. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18:309-U394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinnola A, Cazzaniga S, Alboresi A, Nevo R, Levin-Zaidman S, Reich Z, Bassi R (2015) Light-harvesting complex stress-related proteins catalyze excess energy dissipation in both photosystems of Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell 27:3213–3227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Pisa S, Biersma EM, Convey P, Patiño J, Vanderpoorten A, Werner O, Ros RM (2014) The cosmopolitan moss Bryum argenteum in Antarctica: recent colonisation or in situ survival? Polar Biol 37:1469–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous-equations for assaying chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b extracted with 4 different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic-absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qin XC, Suga M, Kuang TY, Shen JR (2015) Structural basis for energy transfer pathways in the plant PSI-LHCI supercomplex. Science 348:989–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Raszewski G, Renger T (2008) Light harvesting in photosystem II core complexes is limited by the transfer to the trap: can the core complex turn into a photoprotective mode? J Am Chem Soc 130:4431–4446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reinot T, Chen J, Kell A, Jassas M, Robben KC, Zazubovich V, Jankowiak R (2016) On the conflicting estimations of pigment site energies in photosynthetic complexes: a case study of the CP47 complex. Analytical Chemistry Insights 11:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Reppert M, Acharya K, Neupane B, Jankowiak R (2010) Lowest electronic states of the CP47 antenna protein complex of photosystem II: simulation of optical spectra and revised structural assignmentst. J Phys Chem B 114:11884–11898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Roelofs TA, Lee CH, Holzwarth AR (1992) Global target analysis of picosecond chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics from pea-chloroplasts: a new approach to the characterization of the primary processes in photosystem-II alpha-units and beta-units. Biophys J 61:1147–1163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruban AV (2016) Nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: mechanism and effectiveness in protecting plants from photodamage. Plant Physiol 170:1903–1916CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandonà D, Croce R, Pagano A, Crimi M, Bassi R (1998) Higher plants light harvesting proteins. Structure and function as revealed by mutation analysis of either protein or chromophore moieties. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1365:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwarz AMJ, Green TGA, Seppelt RD (1992) Terrestrial vegetation at Canada Glacier, Southern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 12:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schweitzer RH, Melkozernov AN, Blankenship RE, Brudvig GW (1998) Time-resolved fluorescence measurements of photosystem II: the effect of quenching by oxidized chlorophyll Z. J Phys Chem B 102:8320–8326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shibata Y, Yamagishi A, Kawamoto S, Noji T, Itoh S (2010) Kinetically distinct three red chlorophylls in photosystem I of Thermosynechococcus elongatus revealed by femtosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy at 15 K. J Phys Chem B 114:2954–2963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shibata Y, Nishi S, Kawakami K, Shen JR, Renger T (2013) Photosystem II does not possess a simple excitation energy funnel: time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy meets theory. J Am Chem Soc 135:6903–6914CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Slavov C, Reus M, Holzwarth AR (2013) Two different mechanisms cooperate in the desiccation-induced excited state quenching in Parmelia lichen. J Phys Chem B 117:11326–11336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Smirnoff N (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol 125:27–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Standfuss R, van Scheltinga ACT, Lamborghini M, Kühlbrandt W (2005) Mechanisms of photoprotection and nonphotochemical quenching in pea light-harvesting complex at 2.5 A resolution. EMBO J 24:919–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Takizawa K, Cruz JA, Kanazawa A, Kramer DM (2007) The thylakoid proton motive force in vivo. Quantitative, non-invasive probes, energetics, and regulatory consequences of light-induced pmf. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1767:1233–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Triantaphylidès C, Havaux M (2009) Singlet oxygen in plants: production, detoxification and signaling. Trends Plant Sci 14:219–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Umena Y, Kawakami K, Shen JR, Kamiya N (2011) Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473:55–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Veerman J, Vasil’ev S, Paton GD, Ramanauskas J, Bruce D (2007) Photoprotection in the lichen Parmelia sulcata: the origins of desiccation-induced fluorescence quenching. Plant Physiol 145:997–1005CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Wei XP, Su XD, Cao P, Liu XY, Chang WR, Li M, Zhang XZ, Liu ZF (2016) Structure of spinach photosystem II-LHCII supercomplex at 3.2 Å resolution. Nature 534:69–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wientjes E, Croce R (2011) The light-harvesting complexes of higher-plant photosystem I: Lhca1/4 and Lhca2/3 form two red-emitting heterodimers. Biochem J 433:477–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yamakawa H, Itoh S (2013) Dissipation of excess excitation energy by drought-induced nonphotochemical quenching in two species of drought-tolerant moss: desiccation-induced acceleration of photosystem II fluorescence decay. BioChemistry 52:4451–4459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yamakawa H, Fukushima Y, Itoh S, Heber U (2012) Three different mechanisms of energy dissipation of a desiccation-tolerant moss serve one common purpose: to protect reaction centres against photo-oxidation. J Exp Bot 63:3765–3775CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yutaka Shibata
    • 1
  • Ahmed Mohamed
    • 1
    • 2
  • Koichiro Taniyama
    • 1
  • Kentaro Kanatani
    • 1
  • Makiko Kosugi
    • 3
  • Hiroshi Fukumura
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS-EMT)VarennesCanada
  3. 3.Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science and EngineeringChuo UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.National Institute of TechnologySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations