Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 129, Issue 2, pp 205–216 | Cite as

Bacteriopheophytin triplet state in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

  • Rafał Białek
  • Gotard Burdziński
  • Michael R. Jones
  • Krzysztof Gibasiewicz
Open Access
Original Article


It is well established that photoexcitation of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RC) with reduced quinone acceptors results in the formation of a triplet state localized on the primary electron donor P with a significant yield. The energy of this long-lived and therefore potentially damaging excited state is then efficiently quenched by energy transfer to the RC spheroidenone carotenoid, with its subsequent decay to the ground state by intersystem crossing. In this contribution, we present a detailed transient absorption study of triplet states in a set of mutated RCs characterized by different efficiencies of triplet formation that correlate with lifetimes of the initial charge-separated state P+H A . On a microsecond time scale, two types of triplet state were detected: in addition to the well-known spheroidenone triplet state with a lifetime of ~4 μs, in some RCs we discovered a bacteriopheophytin triplet state with a lifetime of ~40 μs. As expected, the yield of the carotenoid triplet increased approximately linearly with the lifetime of P+H A , reaching the value of 42 % for one of the mutants. However, surprisingly, the yield of the bacteriopheophytin triplet was the highest in RCs with the shortest P+H A lifetime and the smallest yield of carotenoid triplet. For these the estimated yield of bacteriopheophytin triplet was comparable with the yield of the carotenoid triplet, reaching a value of ~7 %. Possible mechanisms of formation of the bacteriopheophytin triplet state are discussed.


Carotenoid Triplet Bacteriopheophytin Rhodobacter sphaeroides Spheroidenone 


The primary photochemical reactions in photosynthesis take place in reaction center (RC) pigment-protein complexes. In the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides, the RC comprises three polypeptide chains that provide a scaffold for four bacteriochlorophylls [BChls—two form a dimeric primary electron donor (P) and two are termed accessory BChls (BA and BB)], two bacteriopheophytins (BPhes—HA and HB), two ubiquinones (QA and QB), a carotenoid (Car), and an iron ion (Allen et al. 1987; Yeates et al. 1988) (see Fig. 1). The carotenoid can be either spheroidene or spheroidenone depending on growth conditions, with mainly spheroidenone incorporated into the structure in the presence of oxygen (Schenck et al. 1984). The RC cofactors are arranged in two structurally pseudosymmetrical branches (A and B) differing in function. Branch A facilitates photochemical charge separation, while branch B plays a role in photoprotection by quenching the energy of any potentially harmful triplet states that may be formed during charge separation (Allen et al. 1987).
Fig. 1

Routes of charge separation and triplet energy transfer in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides RC. The gray arrow shows the route of charge separation from P* to P+H A via P+B A . The orange and blue arrows show the route of triplet energy transfer from 3P to the carotenoid and HB, respectively. The dashed arrow shows the possible route of triplet energy transfer from 3Car to 3BPhe. RC cofactors are shown with carbon atoms colored pink (P BChls), green (BA/BB BChls), yellow (HA/HB BPhes), magenta (carotenoid), and cyan (QA/QB ubiquinones). Iron and magnesium atoms are shown as brown and magenta spheres, respectively

Electron transfer in the RC is initiated by formation of the first excited singlet state of the primary electron donor BChl dimer (P*), either by direct absorption of a photon or by energy transfer from any chromophore in the associated light harvesting pigment proteins (Stanley et al. 1996; Jordanides et al. 2001). Formation of P* triggers a charge separation in which the electron is transferred from P to HA via BA to form the state P+H A . The route through which P+H A decays depends on whether the RC is “open,” with an oxidized QA ubiquinone acceptor, or “closed” with a reduced or absent QA. In the laboratory, the RC can be closed by prereducing the QA ubiquinone, or removing it completely through chemical treatment or a gene mutation that changes the protein structure. In the open RC, the electron can be transferred onto QA and then QB. In a closed RC, the state P+H A recombines either to the ground state (P) or to the triplet excited state (3P) via an intermediate triplet radical pair state 3(P+H A ) (Michel-Beyerle et al. 1979; Woodbury and Allen 1995). The 3P state is sufficiently energetic and long-lived (tens of microseconds lifetime) to sensitize singlet oxygen, producing photodamage, and is therefore an undesired product of charge separation. Any imbalance in the rates with which electrons leave the RC via the quinones and enter the RC via P+ has the potential to cause photodamage through the production of BChl triplet states and singlet oxygen (Cogdell et al. 2000).

The Rba. sphaeroides RC contains a Car molecule located next to the BB (BChl), the principal function of which is to quench 3P (Frank and Cogdell 1996; Cogdell et al. 2000). The reported lifetime of the state 3P in the absence of carotenoid is 10–100 µs (Cogdell et al. 1975; Shuvalov and Parson 1981; Cogdell and Frank 1987; Frank and Violette 1989; Farhoosh et al. 1997; Arellano et al. 2004). The triplet energy is transferred from 3P to Car via a thermally activated pathway through the intervening BB, this being necessary because the triplet energy can be transferred only by the Dexter mechanism and Car is too distant from P for direct electron exchange (Frank and Violette 1989; Angerhofer et al. 1998; deWinter and Boxer 1999). The triplet state of the carotenoid (3Car) then decays via thermal deactivation without causing photodamage. The lifetime of 3Car in the Rba. sphaeroides RC is 2–10 µs for both spheroidene and spheroidenone (Monger et al. 1976; Schenck et al. 1984; Frank and Violette 1989; Frank et al. 1996; Farhoosh et al. 1997; Angerhofer et al. 1998; Arellano et al. 2004). In general, the precise triplet lifetime depends on the number of conjugated π bonds in the Car—the larger the number the shorter the lifetime (Kakitani et al. 2007). This number is 10 and 11 for spheroidene and spheroidenone, respectively.

Although, in nature, the toxic effect of triplet states is generally minimized through photoprotective mechanisms which prevent photodamage, the long-lived character of 3P has attractions for biotechnological applications in which the RC is used as a photosensitizer. As an example, Lukashev and coworkers (Lukashev et al. 2007) speculated that in a system with Rba. sphaeroides RCs immobilized on a TiO2 substrate, photosensitization occurs by injection of electrons from the RC 3P triplet state to TiO2. For such a technology, it could be desirable to increase the yield of 3P by manipulation of the structure and cofactor composition of the RC. For this reason, systematic characterization of triplet state pathways and target molecules in a range of engineered RCs with a variety of yields of triplet formation may help in finding a RC that is optimal for photovoltaic applications.

So far, the yield and mechanism of quenching of triplet states have been investigated in a variety of RCs with mutations near the A- and/or B-branch cofactors (Laible et al. 1998; deWinter and Boxer 1999; Marchanka et al. 2007; Gibasiewicz et al. 2011). A previous study by Gibasiewicz and coworkers (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011) explored the influence of point mutations around the cofactors of the A-branch on the yield of triplet formation, but did not address the localization of the triplet states or their lifetimes. The yield of triplet formation was found to decrease as the lifetime of the P+H A state became shorter.

In this study, apart from the triplet state of Car, another triplet state assigned to BPhe was detected and characterized by microsecond transient absorption spectroscopy in a range of mutated membrane-embedded and wild-type (WT) detergent-purified Rba. sphaeroides RCs. In all cases, a spheroidenone triplet state was formed and decayed with similar lifetimes of ~4 µs. The yield of 3Car was strongly modulated ranging from 4 to 47 % in different samples. An additional long-lived triplet state assigned to BPhe (3BPhe) had a lifetime of ~40 μs and yield of up to 5 %. Importantly, the efficiency of formation of the 3BPhe state was inversely correlated with the efficiency of formation of the 3Car state.

Materials and methods

RC-enriched membranes from antenna-deficient strains of Rba. sphaeroides and purified RCs were prepared as described previously (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011). The set of point mutations employed in this study were also described in detail recently (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011). In brief, the following mutants were studied: AMW (Ala M260 replaced by Trp), YMF (Tyr M210 by Phe), YMW (Tyr M210 by Trp), GML (Gly M203 by Leu), YLH (Tyr L128 by His), FLY (Phe L146 by Tyr), FLA (Phe L146 by Ala) and ELL (Glu L104 Leu). Apart from RC-membranes, four preparations of WT- and ELL-purified RCs were used (described below). Throughout the text, abbreviations of the samples names with extension “-RC” denote purified RCs, whereas those without this extension denote RC-enriched membranes.

Prior to measurements, stock solutions of RC-membranes and purified RCs were diluted with buffer to an absorbance of 0.7 (±5 %) at 760 nm in 1-cm cuvette. Buffer for RC-membranes was 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and for purified RCs the same with an addition of 0.1 % LDAO (lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide; Sigma-Aldrich). Sodium ascorbate and o-phenanthroline were then added to final concentrations of 10 mM both to all RC-membranes and two samples of purified RCs (WT-RCoph and ELL-RCoph). Sodium ascorbate reduced P+ to P (the samples were continuously illuminated with weak background white light forming the state P+Q A ), thus leaving all the RCs in the closed state with Q A . Addition of o-phenanthroline replaced the ubiquinone in the QB binding site thus blocking electron transfer from Q A to QB (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011). The o-phenanthroline was prepared as a 250 mM stock solution in ethanol yielding final concentration of ethanol in the sample of 4 %. Additional samples of purified RCs (WT-RC and ELL-RC) were prepared with 10 mM sodium ascorbate and 4 % ethanol with no o-phenanthroline added. Purified RCs are partially devoid of quinone QB and thus o-phenanthroline was not necessary to keep the fraction of RCs without quinone QB closed.

The transient absorption measurement system was constructed as described previously (Burdzinski et al. 2011). Briefly, pump pulses (532 nm; 8 ns FWHM) were generated at a repetition rate of 0.5 Hz by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Continuum Surelite II). For the probe light, a 150-W xenon arc lamp (Applied Photophysics) was used in pulsed mode with a repetition rate of 1 Hz. A monochromator (Acton Research Spectra Pro 300i) was used to disperse the probe light which was then detected by photomultiplier (R928 Hamamatsu) connected to a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS 680 C). Samples were placed in a quartz cuvette (1 × 1 cm cross section).

In most cases, transient absorption difference measurements were performed in the range of 435–850 nm for RC-membranes or 375–835 nm for purified WT-RCs in 15-nm steps. The smaller spectral range used for RC-membranes was due to intensive light scattering at shorter wavelengths. Excitation was at 532 nm and the temporal window of the measurements was either 13.5 µs (GML, FLY, FLA, YLH), 27 µs (AMW, YMW, YMF, WT, WT-RC, WT-RCoph), 54 µs (ELL), or 540 µs (ELL-RC, ELL-RCoph) for all detection wavelengths. In a few individual cases (ELL, YMF, and purified WT-RCs), measurements at selected wavelengths were repeated over a longer time window (135 or 270 µs). The excitation energy per pulse was in the range of 0.1–1.1 mJ, and the data were typically normalized in respect to the excitation energy used for each sample. All kinetics were results of averaging of 30 traces.

Measurements were conducted under ambient atmosphere apart from a few in an argon atmosphere. The procedure of deoxygenation of samples was as follows. Samples were placed in a sealed cuvette and a stream of argon was directed onto the surface of solution instead of bubbling into the solution in order to prevent formation of foam. Argon treatment lasted 20 min and was performed just before measurement. The efficiency of the described procedure was tested with the aqueous solution of phenalenone, which is a well-known oxygen sensitizer (Schmidt et al. 1994). The deoxygenation extended the phenalenone triplet lifetime from 1.7 to 80 µs.

For each sample, steady-state absorption spectra were taken before and after the transient absorption measurements. Due to large size of RC-membranes, their spectra were distorted by light scattering particularly contributing at shorter wavelengths. After each transient absorption experiment, the lineshape of the RC-membranes absorption spectra were not significantly changed but for some samples, and background light scattering was increased somewhat. The small gradual loss of transparency of these samples during the transient absorption measurements was monitored during the experiment as a loss of the signal at 600 nm and was corrected for.

Transient absorption kinetic traces were typically fitted with the sum of two exponentials with or without an offset using the global analysis algorithm in program Asufit ( from Arizona State University and OriginPro. The starting point of fit was at the maximum of the transient signal at about 150 ns.


Kinetics of decay

Transient absorption kinetics were measured for membrane-embedded WT-RCs, a range of membrane-embedded engineered RCs and detergent-purified WT- and ELL-RCs (see “Materials and methods” section). RCs were treated with sodium ascorbate and weak background illumination to reduce QA, blocking charge separation at the radical pair P+H A . With one exception the engineered RCs contained a single amino acid change that either introduced or removed a hydrogen bond or charge-dipole interaction with HA, BA or the P BChls. As described in detail elsewhere (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011), these changes modify the free energies of the states P+B A and/or P+H A in a variety of ways, with resulting modifications in the rate of charge separation and charge recombination. The exception was the AMW engineered RC which lacks a QA ubiquinone such that charge separation is blocked at P+H A without the need for treatment with ascorbate and background illumination.

Kinetics were measured across a range of wavelengths following photoexcitation at 532 nm (see “Materials and methods” section). The absorption of the triplet state of spheroidenone is expected to exhibit maximum at ~600 nm (Arellano et al. 2004), and a few typical kinetic traces measured at this wavelength are shown in Fig. 2a. The major difference between the three traces was their initial amplitude, reflecting differences in the formation yield of the carotenoid triplet state. Following the fast increase of the signal, a ~4 μs component (3.8–4.5 µs for different RCs see Table 1, τ 1) dominating the overall decay was observed in all RCs (see normalized traces in inset of Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Absorbance changes for selected RCs measured at 600 and 750 nm after excitation at 532 nm. a The kinetics reveal decay of the triplet state of spheroidenone (Car). b The kinetics reveal decay of the triplet state of BPhe. In the main figures, the kinetics were normalized to the same excitation energy and sample OD at ~760 nm. In the insets, the kinetics were normalized to the same initial amplitude. Data in (b) were smoothed using a Savitzky–Golay algorithm with a 10-points window

Table 1

Mean lifetimes of P+H A and lifetimes and yields of triplet states in RC-membranes and purified RCs


\(\tau_{\text{PH}} \left( {\text{ns}} \right)\) (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011)

\(\tau_{1} \left( {\mu {\text{s}}} \right)\)




Φ TCar






































































































\(\varvec{ \tau }_{\text{PH}} \varvec{ }\) mean lifetime of the state P+H A , \({\tau}_{1}\) lifetime of triplet state of Car obtained from biexponential global analysis, \({{\Phi}}_{\text{T}}\) total triplet formation yield, \({\% }_{\text{Car}} ,{\% }_{\text{BPhe}}\) percentage contributions of triplet state on Car and BPhe, \({{\Phi}}_{\text{TCar}} ,\,{{\Phi}}_{\text{TBPhe}}\) yields of triplet formation on Car and BPhe. \({\tau}_{2}\), the lifetime of triplet state of BPhe, was fixed at 40 μs. A possible minor contribution of the triplet state localized on bacteriochlorophyll(s) in some samples was neglected in the calculations

For most RCs, an additional longer decay component was also observed. In most cases, its amplitude contribution was the highest at a probe wavelength 750 nm and the decays at this wavelength is shown in Fig. 2b (traces normalized to initial amplitude are also shown in the inset). In addition, at 750 nm there was a small raising phase of the negative signal on a time scale of the first few microseconds after excitation [most clearly visible for the YMF RC-membranes in Fig. 2b (red)].

Most measurements were performed in a 13.5, 27, or 54 μs time window (see “Materials and methods” section), but for some samples and wavelengths a longer time window (135, 270 or 540 μs) was used (purified ELL-RCs—whole spectrum; ELL, YMF membranes and purified WT-RCs—selected wavelengths). These experiments allowed a time constant of 30–60 μs (with an average of 40 μs) for the longer decay component to be determined. A lifetime value of 40 μs was kept fixed in biexponential fitting of decays for all samples to account for this component. In addition, for purified WT- and ELL-RCs an additional nondecaying component was observed.

Absorbance difference spectra of purified RCs

Measurements of decay kinetics at a range of wavelengths allowed the construction of transient absorption difference spectra which were then analyzed using a global fitting procedure (van Stokkum et al. 2004) to yield decay-associated spectra (DAS). The most complex spectral evolution was obtained with purified ELL-RCs which had not been treated with o-phenanthroline (ELL-RC). Data for these RCs were best fitted with two exponentials and a nondecaying component (offset), addition of a third exponential component not improving the fit significantly. Figure 3a presents the DAS for the three components of the decay in ELL-RC. The absorbance changes were measured every 40 ns over a time window of 540 μs. As can be seen, the whole spectrum was dominated by the shortest (~4-µs) component except for the region at around 750 nm, corresponding to the BPhe absorbance band (Fig. 3c) where the other two components had a higher amplitude. Data for the WT-RC collected over a time window of 27 µs (Fig. 3b) could be fitted with two exponentials, but addition of an offset resulted in an additional featureless DAS and did not improve the fit significantly. The lineshapes of the DAS for the WT-RC were similar to those for the ELL-RC.
Fig. 3

Comparison of decay-associated spectra for WT- and ELL-purified RCs without o-phenanthroline and the steady-state absorption spectrum of WT-RCs. a Fit for ELL-RCs over a 540-μs time window. b Fit for WT-RCs over a 27-μs time window. c Absorption bands labeled according to the relevant RC cofactors. The DAS were obtained from a global analysis using the fitting function ΔA(λ) = A 1(λ)exp(−t/τ 1) + A 2(λ)exp(−t/τ 2) + A 3 (with A 3 = 0 for WT-RC). Note the different scales of the ordinate axis for the DAS of the slow components (right axis)

Absorbance difference spectra of all RC samples

Figure 4a presents absorbance difference spectra at 150 ns delay for all the RCs investigated. Data for purified RCs were collected across a broader spectral range than for RC-membranes, as they were less scattering at shorter wavelengths, allowing observation of an additional positive band at 420 nm. As can be seen from Fig. 4b, where the spectra were normalized to the peak at 600 nm, all spectra were similar in lineshape apart from the depth of the negative features at 495 and 750 nm. The most distinctive were the spectra of the ELL and FLA RC-membranes which had the deepest ~750 nm trough and the shallowest ~495 nm trough.
Fig. 4

Comparison of the initial transient absorption spectrum for all RC-membranes and purified RCs (with and without o-phenanthroline) excited at 532 nm. The spectra were constructed from the values of absorbance changes measured 150 ns after excitation (at the signal maximum, ~600 nm). a Spectra normalized to the same excitation energy and sample OD at ~760 nm. The absorbance change for WT RC-membranes was arbitrarily set to 1 at 600 nm. The inset shows a comparison of maximum amplitudes of the spectra at 600 nm relative to WT. b Transient absorption spectra normalized to the same amplitude at 600 nm. The order of samples in the legend in (b) (and also in Figs. 5, 6) is from longest to shortest lifetimes of P+H A for RC-membranes, with purified RCs added at the end

All data were treated with the global analysis algorithm described above for the purified RCs. Only data for purified ELL-RCs (with and without o-phenanthroline) required fitting with two exponentials and an offset. For all other membrane-bound RCs and purified WT-RCs, a two exponential model without an offset was satisfactory.

DAS of the fast (τ 1) and slow (τ 2) lifetime components of each two-exponential fit are presented in Figs. 5, 6, respectively. The DAS of the fast component were almost the same in shape for all RCs, with a dominating positive signal at ~600 nm, a small positive signal at ~750 nm, and a negative signal at ~495 nm. The positive value of this DAS around 750 nm corresponded well with the shape of the kinetics in Fig. 2b, which showed a short increasing phase of the negative signals for YMF and WT-RC. The major difference between the spectra in Fig. 5 was a difference in overall amplitude before normalization.
Fig. 5

Decay-associated spectra of the τ1 = ~ 4 µs component. The DAS were obtained from a global analysis using the fitting function ΔA(λ) = A 1(λ)exp(−t/τ 1) + A 2(λ)exp(−t/τ 2), except for ELL-RC and ELL-RCoph for which additional nondecaying component (A 3) was added. Spectra were normalized by dividing them by the value of A 1 (600 nm) for each sample. Fits were performed in 13.5 μs time window for GML, FLY, FLA, and YLH, 54 µs for ELL, 540 µs for ELL-RC and ELL-RCoph, and 27 µs for the remaining

Fig. 6

Decay-associated spectra of the τ 2 = ~40 µs component. The DAS were obtained from global analysis using the fitting function ΔA(λ) = A 1(λ)exp(−t/τ 1) + A 2(λ)exp(−t/τ 2) except for ELL-RC and ELL-RCoph for which additional nondecaying component (A 3) was added. Spectra in a and b are normalized by dividing by the value of A 1 (600 nm) for each sample. Note that the scale of the ordinate axis is ~4.5-fold larger in panel b than in panel a. Spectra in c and d are normalized to a value of −1 value at 750 nm. Fits were performed in the same time windows as in Fig. 5

The DAS of the slow component (Fig. 6) showed a clear minimum at ~750 nm, a broad and essentially positive structure between ~660 and ~400 nm (Fig. 6a, b), and the red edge at ~395 nm of a negative band for purified WT-RCs (Fig. 6b, d). The lineshape of this slow component DAS was not identical among all RCs (Fig. 6c, d), with peaks positions being approximately the same but the relative amplitude of these peaks and detailed structure differing between RCs. The most strongly diverging DAS was that for the AMW RC-membranes for which the absolute negative amplitude at 750 nm was the smallest.

The DAS of the nondecaying component (Fig. 7) required for fits to data on purified ELL-RCs was similar in shape to the slow component DAS apart from the structure of the positive band, which was red shifted in the nondecaying component. The high quality of the spectra of this component was due to the broad time window (540 µs). The two DAS obtained clearly showed a maximum at around 650 nm and two minima at around 750 and 530 nm, and differed from one another mainly in terms of amplitude (see normalized spectra in the inset of Fig. 7).
Fig. 7

Decay-associated spectra of the nondecaying component for purified ELL-RCs. The DAS were obtained from a global analysis using the fitting function ΔA(λ) = A 1(λ)exp(−t/τ 1) + A 2(λ)exp(−t/τ 2) + A 3. Spectra in the main figure were normalized by dividing them by the value of A 1(600 nm) for each sample. The spectra in the inset are normalized to a value of −1 at 750 nm. Fits were performed over a 540-μs time window

The influence of oxygen

Kinetics at 600 and 750 nm for samples of ELL RC-membranes and ELL-purified RCs without the addition of o-phenanthroline (ELL-RC) were obtained after argon treatment as described in Materials and methods. These kinetics (data not shown) did not show any difference compared to kinetics measured in an ambient atmosphere.


The measurements described above examined the spectral properties of long-lived states formed after photoexcitation of membrane-bound or purified RCs in which forward electron transfer from H A to QA was blocked either by application of ascorbate plus illumination or by a genetic change in the AMW RC. As recombination of P+H A occurs in a few tens of nanoseconds, light-induced absorbance changes persisting on a microsecond time scale are attributable to long-lived triplet states. Two such states were detected in data collected using a range of RCs that are known to show varying rates of recombination of P+H A and, in those with the slowest recombination, an increased yield of triplet states (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011).

Attribution of the fast decay component to a Car triplet state

The DAS of the ~4 μs decay component (Fig. 5) can be ascribed to the triplet state of spheroidenone (Schenck et al. 1984; Arellano et al. 2004), the trough at ~495 nm corresponding well to the maximum of the broad steady-state absorption band of the single spheroidenone in the RC (Fig. 3c). The lifetime of ~4 µs is consistent with published values for the lifetime of the spheroidenone triplet state in purple bacterial pigment-protein complexes (RCs, LH1, and LH2) of around 4–5 µs (Schenck et al. 1984; Arellano et al. 2004; Kakitani et al. 2007).

Identification of the slow decay component as a BPhe triplet state

In most RCs, the most prominent feature of the DAS of the slow, ~40 µs decay component was a trough at ~750 nm (Figs. 3a, b, 6). As can be seen from Fig. 3c, this corresponded well to the lowest energy absorption band of the two RC BPhes at 756 nm, suggesting that this component may be attributed to the triplet state of one or both of the RC BPhes. The shape of this component resembled the BPhe triplet absorbance difference spectrum acquired in methanol-acetone solution (Holten et al. 1976), and lifetimes of a BPhe triplet state in methanol-acetone, ethanol, or toluene solutions have been reported to vary between 16 and 30 µs (Holten et al. 1976; Yang et al. 2011) in good agreement with the average ~40 µs time constant observed in the present work. To our knowledge, the triplet spectrum of one or both of the BPhes in the RC protein has not been reported previously. However, a contribution from photobleaching of the accessory BChls or P, revealing the triplet states of these molecules, to the carotenoid triplet spectra has been observed (Lous and Hoff 1989; Frank and Violette 1989; Angerhofer et al. 1998; Arellano et al. 2004) and attributed to a mixed population of RCs with and without Car. No signature of the triplet state of the accessory BChls was observed in the Qy region in the present work (i.e., there was a lack of any photobleaching at 800 nm in the 40 μs DAS, with the possible exception of data recorded for AMW RC-membranes—Fig. 6c), although a small trough at ~600 nm (corresponding to the Qx bands of BChl and P) was present in the DAS for some RC-membranes (Fig. 6a, b) indicating a possibility of a small admixture of the triplet state of P. As an alternative attribution, the bleaching at 750 nm could be ascribed to H A in a 3[P+H A ] state that is in an equilibrium with a 3P state, but this possibility is challenged by the lack of a significant photobleaching in the ~820–850 nm region (Fig. 6) where the short-wavelength tail of P Qy photobleaching signal would be expected. The spectra of the slow component were not identical in shape among all the RC samples (Fig. 6c, d). This may be due to the above-mentioned admixing of different states in different contributions (3BChl or 3P) to the 3BPhe triplet state, or the influence of point mutations on the shape of the 3BPhe spectrum. The possibility of 3BPhe state formation has previously been suggested on the basis that singlet oxygen formation was found to be higher in thermally treated RCs with induced pheophytinization of BChls (Uchoa et al. 2008).

Identification of the nondecaying component

Photobleaching bands in the DAS of the nondecaying component at 530 and 750 nm corresponded well with the absorption bands of BPhe in the steady-state spectrum, suggesting that this component could also be ascribed to the triplet state of one or both BPhes. This component was required for fitting only for purified ELL-RCs and, comparing the lineshapes of the slow component DAS for WT-RCs (Fig. 3b, red) and the slow and nondecaying components for ELL-RCs (Fig. 3a, red and blue), it seems plausible that the single DAS for the WT-RC is equivalent to the sum of the two DAS for the ELL-RC. This statement is supported by the presence of a nondecaying component in the WT-RC kinetics in Fig. 2b. By comparing spectra of the nondecaying component (Fig. 3a, 7) with those of the 40 µs component (Fig. 3a, b), it can be seen that there are differences in the positive band below 700 nm, this band being red shifted in the spectra of the nondecaying component. The origin of this could be heterogeneity of sample or the protein dynamics on the microsecond time scale.

Effect of deoxygenation

As it was described in Results, there is no influence of deoxygenation on the lifetime of the triplet state of both BPhe and Car. The role of spheroidenone is to prevent RCs from damage from singlet oxygen by quenching the triplet state of P (Cogdell et al. 2000) so it is not surprising that the oxygen does not quench 3Car. On the other hand, it is reported in the literature that BPhe should sensitize singlet oxygen (Uchoa et al. 2008). The likely reason why this sensitization was not observed in described experiments is the presence of ascorbate, which was reported to be triplet suppressor. Concentration of the order of 50 µM of ascorbate can decrease singlet oxygen formation by 20 % (Uchoa et al. 2008), so 10 mM concentration could suppress it totally.

Relative contributions of the two triplet states and their absolute yields

Neglecting a possible minor contribution from 3P and/or 3BChl as discussed above, the molar fractions of the triplet states located on BPhe and Car were estimated by assuming that the amplitude of the faster decay at 495 nm came only from photobleaching of Car and the sum of the amplitudes of the two components at 750 nm came from photobleaching of BPhe. Thus, the percentage contribution of each triplet state was determined from the following formula (see “Appendix” for full derivation):
$$\%_{\text{Car}} = \frac{{1.09 \times A_{{1;495\,{\text{nm}}}} }}{{A_{{1;750\,{\text{nm}}}} + A_{{2;750\,{\text{nm}}}} + 1.09 \times A_{{1;495\,{\text{nm}}}} }} \times 100\,\%$$
$$\%_{\text{BPhe}} \, = \, 100\,\% - \%_{\text{Car}}.$$

The resulting percentage populations are presented in Table 1, and ranged from ~98 %/2 % to 39 %/61 % for 3Car/3BPhe.

On the assumption that \(A_{{1;495\,{\text{nm}}}}\) is a specific measure of the 3Car formed, one can also calculate the total yield of triplet (φ T) in arbitrary units to compare between samples:

$$\varPhi_{\text{T}} = \frac{{A_{{1;495\, {\text{nm}}}} }}{{\%_{\text{Car}} }} \times 100\,\%.$$

It has been reported that in QA-reduced WT-RCs, the yield of triplet formation is 0.15 (Parson and Cogdell 1975; Michel-Beyerle et al. 1980; Schenck et al. 1982). This value was obtained for purified RCs reduced with sodium dithionite, which is most similar to our purified WT-RC sample with sodium ascorbate and without o-phenanthroline. Thus, a value of 0.15 was ascribed to the triplet yield for this preparation of WT-RC and all other values were calculated relative to this. The resulting total triplet formation yields are presented in Table 1 along with absolute contributions from 3Car and 3BPhe. One can see that almost the same value of total triplet yield was obtained for WT RC-membranes (0.14) as for purified WT-RC (0.15). Mutation AMW leads to genetic depletion of QA in RC, and the triplet formation yield obtained for this RC (0.25) corresponded well with a value of 0.32 ± 0.04 obtained for purified WT-RCs with chemical depletion of QA (Chidsey et al. 1984). This observation reinforces our confidence in the correctness of the calculation algorithm.

Mutations revealed a correlation between P+HA lifetime and triplet yields

A factor which could affect the yield of triplet states in a mutated RC is the impact of the mutation on the mean lifetime of P+H A state. This was determined in previous work on this set of mutated membrane-embedded RCs (Gibasiewicz et al. 2011) and the mean lifetimes obtained are presented in Table 1. The plots in Figs. 8a, b present the dependence of the relative yields of 3Car and 3BPhe, and absolute yields of triplet, respectively, on the mean lifetime of P+H A . As can be seen from Fig. 8b, the total triplet yield increased with increasing P+H A lifetime, and this was due to an increase in the yield of carotenoid triplet. Although the absolute level of 3BPhe formation did not vary greatly (Fig. 8b), its relative contribution was particularly strong in those mutants that had a strongly accelerated rate of P+H A decay (Fig. 8a). This may be caused by point mutations affecting the energy levels of chromophores in branch A.
Fig. 8

Dependence of triplet formation efficiencies on the mean lifetime of P+H A in RC-membranes. a Relative contribution of triplet states on BPhe and car. b Absolute triplet formation yields on BPhe (Φ TBPhe), Car (Φ TCar), and their sum (Φ T). The color lines indicate trends in the changes of Φ TBPhe and Φ TCar vs. P+H A lifetime

Effect of o-phenanthroline on triplet yields in purified RCs

The yield of total triplet formation in purified WT-RCs with o-phenanthroline (WT-RCoph—0.28) was similar to that in membranes mutant RCs lacking QA (AMW—0.25). It was reported (Gibasiewicz and Pajzderska 2008) that o-phenanthroline slows down P+H A recombination by screening the negative charge on Q A that makes this RC similar to the AMW RCs and explains the similarity between these two. On the other hand, the total triplet yields of both WT- and ELL-purified RCs without o-phenanthroline were significantly lower than the respective yields for purified RCs with o-phenanthroline. This effect may be caused by (a) faster P+H A recombination in the absence of o-phenanthroline and/or (b) presence of a significant fraction of RCs in open state, i.e., containing quinone QB that accepts electrons from Q A , RCs being unable to form triplet states due to very short lifetime of P+H A - in purified RCs without o-phenanthroline. Both for WT- and ELL-purified RCs, the positive influence of o-phenanthroline on the Car triplet yield is qualitatively the same as the effect of this compound on the total triplet yield (Table 1). In the case of purified ELL-RCs, also BPhe triplet yield increases after addition of o-phenanthroline, although the effect is less spectacular. Oppositely, the BPhe triplet yield for purified WT-RCs is almost unchanged after addition of o-phenanthroline. These observations suggest that in purified RCs there is no clear positive correlation between the lifetimes of P+H A and BPhe triplet yields, similarly as it was shown for RC-enriched membranes (Fig. 6b).

Possible mechanisms for the formation of 3BPhe

There are at least three possible explanations for the formation of a 3BPhe state: (1) the transfer of a triplet excited state from primary donor to the HB BPhe with some probability in all RCs, (2) formation of a triplet state of BPhe directly from its singlet state by intersystem crossing (ISC), bearing in mind that an excitation wavelength of 532 nm was used which corresponds to the overlapping QX bands of the two RC BPhes, or (3) the occurrence of a subpopulation of damaged RCs.

Regarding mechanism 1, it is well established that 3P is quenched by carotenoid through the intermediate formation of the triplet state of the accessory BChl BB (see Introduction), a reaction that is thermally activated. One possibility therefore is that the energy of 3P is transferred with some probability from BB to the HB BPhe rather than to the Car. 3BPhe is almost not observed in RC-membranes containing WT-RCs and so probably energy levels are normally unfavorable for this triplet transfer. The fact that higher levels of 3BPhe triplet were seen in both samples of purified WT-RC could be explained by a shift in these energy levels that activates a low yield of triplet energy transfer from 3P to 3BPhe. In support of this, it is well known that charge separation in WT-RCs in RC-membranes is somewhat slower than in purified WT-RCs (P* lifetime of 5 ps versus 3–3.5 ps). It is less easy to explain why the mutations YMW, YLH, FLY, FLA, and ELL would also affect the yield of a HB triplet in RC-membranes, as each of these mutations is in the vicinity of P or the A-branch BA and HA. One possible explanation is that the observed triplet state is localized on BPhe HA rather than HB. However, given the well-established mechanism (Angerhofer et al. 1998) that the triplet naturally goes via the B branch through BB to the Car, this would seem to favor BPhe HB as the final carrier of the triplet. Another possibility is triplet transfer from 3P to HB through the Car. As it can be seen in Fig. 5, for most of the samples the fast component DAS was slightly positive at around 750 nm which could be the signature of transfer of triplet state energy from the Car to BPhe. The same process is also seen in Fig. 2b as a small raising phase of the negative signals in YMF and WT-RC kinetics. This route would also favor HB as the triplet acceptor as it is much closer to Car than HA. However, this positive signal could be also a tail of triplet–triplet absorption of Car so this requires further investigation.

Regarding mechanism 2, it has been proposed in the literature that a triplet state may be formed on BPhe by intersystem crossing (Uchoa et al. 2008), but on the other hand results from EPR spectroscopy have been presented that show that 3BPhe formation via intersystem crossing is unlikely (Marchanka et al. 2007). Although in the present study the RCs were excited at 532 nm, implying initial formation of the singlet excited states of HA/HB, expectations from the well-characterized mechanism of RC energy transduction, is that excited state energy should be passed on a subpicosecond time scale to P* (Stanley et al. 1996; Jordanides et al. 2001), or that charge separation should be initiated from an alternative state such as BA* (van Brederode et al. 1997). Given this, it seems unlikely that a persistent 3BPhe state with a lifetime of tens of microseconds could be explained by direct formation of HA* or HB* after 532 nm excitation followed by intersystem crossing. Also, were this to be a viable mechanism then one might reasonably expect to see a similar level of 3BPhe in all of the RCs tested, as the mutations investigated had only very small effects on the absorbance spectrum of the RC.

Regarding mechanism 3, the nature of the RC samples used in this study makes it unlikely that the observed 3BPhe signal could be due to RC damage. For the bulk of the samples in which this signal was detected, the RC was not removed from the native membrane, providing no opportunity for loss of the native carotenoid during a purification procedure. Many of the mutant RCs studied have had their structures determined to a good resolution by X-ray crystallography and the resulting data show no indication of structural changes around the carotenoid binding site.

Finally, evidence was seen for the presence of this 3BPhe state in purified RCs as well as membrane-embedded complexes, which rules out the possibility that the observed state is associated with pigments located in the membrane outside the RC.

In the view of the presented results and discussion therefore, mechanism 1 seems to be most plausible. However, further investigation is necessary to explore the mechanism of 3BPhe formation in detail.


Obtained kinetics and spectra of WT-RCs and mutant RCs with an altered rate of P+H A recombination produced new insight into triplet states formed following photoexcitation. In all samples, the triplet state of spheroidenone was observed with lifetime of ~4 µs. Neither the introduction of point mutations around A-branch chromophores nor the isolation procedure affected the shape of the carotenoid triplet absorption spectrum or its lifetime. For most of the samples, a 3BPhe state was observed with lifetime of ~40 µs. In RC-membranes, both 3Car and 3BPhe formation yields depend on the P+H A lifetime but in an opposite way. The mechanism of 3BPhe formation needs further investigation.



K. G. and R. B. acknowledge the financial support from the Polish National Science Center (project entitled “Bio-semiconductor hybrids for photovoltaic cells” no. 2012/07/B/NZ1/02639), R.B. acknowledges the Polish government and European Union (project entitled “Construction of photovoltaic cells based on Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs” no. 18/POIG/GP/2013), and M.R.J. acknowledges the financial support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom. Nanosecond transient absorption studies were performed at the Center of Ultrafast Laser Spectroscopy at A. Mickiewicz University in Poznan.


  1. Allen JP, Feher G, Yeates TO et al (1987) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5730–5734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5730 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Angerhofer A, Bornhäuser F, Aust V et al (1998) Triplet energy transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1365:404–420. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00093-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano JB, Melø TB, Fyfe PK et al (2004) Multichannel flash spectroscopy of the reaction centers of wild-type and mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides: bacteriochlorophyllB-mediated interaction between the carotenoid triplet and the special pair. Photochem Photobiol 79:68–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2004.tb09859.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdzinski G, Bayda M, Hug GL et al (2011) Time-resolved studies on the photoisomerization of a phenylene-silylene- vinylene type compound in its first singlet excited state. J Lumin 131:577–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chidsey CED, Kirmaier C, Holten D, Boxer SG (1984) Magnetic field dependence of radical-pair decay kinetics and molecular triplet quantum yield in quinone-depleted reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 766:424–437. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(84)90258-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cogdell RJ, Frank HA (1987) How carotenoids function in photosynthetic bacteria. BBA Rev Bioenerg 895:63–79. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4173(87)80008-3 Google Scholar
  7. Cogdell RJ, Monger TG, Parson WW (1975) Carotenoid triplet states in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides and Rhodospirillum rubrum. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 408:189–199. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90122-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogdell RJ, Howard TD, Bittl R et al (2000) How carotenoids protect bacterial photosynthesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355:1345–1349. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0696 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. deWinter A, Boxer SG (1999) The mechanism of triplet energy transfer from the special pair to the carotenoid in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. J Phys Chem B 103:8786–8789. doi: 10.1021/jp992259d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farhoosh R, Chynwat V, Gebhard R et al (1997) Triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and carotenoids in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers incorporated with spheroidene analogs having different extents of pi-electron conjugation. Photochem Photobiol 66:97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03144.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank HA, Cogdell RJ (1996) Carotenoids in photosynthesis. Photochem Photobiol 63:257–264. doi: 10.1351/pac198557050723 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank HA, Violette CA (1989) Monomeric bacteriochlorophyll is required for the triplet energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 976:222–232. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80234-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank HA, Chynwat V, Posteraro A et al (1996) Triplet state energy transfer between the primary donor and the carotenoid in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1 reaction centers exchanged with modified bacteriochlorophyll pigments and reconstituted with spheroidene. Photochem Photobiol 64:823–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb01842.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibasiewicz K, Pajzderska M (2008) Primary radical pair P(+)H(-) lifetime in rhodobacter sphaeroides with blocked electron transfer to Q(A). Effect of o-phenanthroline. J Phys Chem B 112:1858–1865. doi: 10.1021/jp075184j CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibasiewicz K, Pajzderska M, Potter JA et al (2011) Mechanism of recombination of the P + H(A)- radical pair in mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers with modified free energy gaps between P+B(A) and P+H(A). J Phys Chem B 115:13037–13050. doi: 10.1021/jp206462g CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holten D, Gouterman M, Parson WW et al (1976) Electron transfer from photoexcited singlet and triplet bacteriopheophytin. Photochem Photobiol 23:415–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1976.tb07275.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jordanides XJ, Scholes GD, Fleming GR (2001) The mechanism of energy transfer in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center. J Phys Chem B 105:1652–1669. doi: 10.1021/jp003572e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kakitani Y, Akahane J, Ishii H et al (2007) Conjugation-length dependence of the T1 lifetimes of carotenoids free in solution and incorporated into the LH2, LH1, RC, and RC-LH1 complexes: possible mechanisms of triplet-energy dissipation. Biochemistry 46:2181–2197. doi: 10.1021/bi062237z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Laible P, Chynwat V, Thurnauer M (1998) Protein modifications affecting triplet energy transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. Biophys J 74:2623–2637. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77968-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lous EJ, Hoff AJ (1989) Isotropic and linear dichroic triplet-minus-singlet absorbance difference spectra of two carotenoid-containing bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers in the temperature range 10–288 K. An analysis of bacteriochlorophyll-carotenoid triplet transfer. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 974:88–103. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80169-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lukashev EP, Nadtochenko VA, Permenova EP et al (2007) Electron phototransfer between photosynthetic reaction centers of the bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and semiconductor mesoporous TiO2 films. Dokl Biochem Biophys 415:211–216. doi: 10.1134/S1607672907040138 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marchanka A, Paddock M, Lubitz W, van Gastel M (2007) Low-temperature pulsed epr study at 34 ghz of the triplet states of the primary electron donor P 865 and the carotenoid in native and mutant bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 46:14782–14794. doi: 10.1021/bi701593r CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Michel-Beyerle ME, Scheer H, Seidlitz H et al (1979) Time-resolved magnetic field effect on triplet formation in photosynthetic reaction centers of rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26. FEBS Lett 100:9–12. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)81120-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Michel-Beyerle ME, Scheer H, Seidlitz H, Tempus D (1980) Magnetic field effect on triplets and radical ions in reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria. FEBS Lett 110:129–132. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80040-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monger TG, Cogdell RJ, Parson WW (1976) Triplet states of bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoids in chromatophores of photosynthetic bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 449:136–153. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(76)90013-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parson WW, Cogdell RJ (1975) The primary photochemical reaction of bacterial photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Bioenerg 416:105–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(75)90014-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schenck CC, Blankenship RE, Parson WW (1982) Radical-pair decay kinetics, triplet yields and delayed fluorescence from bacterial reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 680:44–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(82)90315-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schenck CC, Mathis P, Lutz M (1984) Triplet formation and triplet decay in reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Photochem Photobiol 39:407–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb08198.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt R, Tanielian C, Dunsbach R, Wolff C (1994) Phenalenone, a universal reference compound for the determination of quantum yields of singlet oxygen O2(1Δg) sensitization. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 79:11–17. doi: 10.1016/1010-6030(93)03746-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shuvalov VA, Parson WW (1981) Energies and kinetics of radical pairs involving bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin in bacterial reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:957–961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.957 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Stanley RJ, King B, Boxer SG (1996) Excited state energy transfer pathways in photosynthetic reaction centers. 1 Structural symmetry effects. J Phys Chem 100:12052–12059. doi: 10.1021/jp9614916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uchoa AF, Knox PP, Turchielle R et al (2008) Singlet oxygen generation in the reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Eur Biophys J 37:843–850. doi: 10.1007/s00249-008-0287-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. van Brederode ME, Jones MR, Van Mourik F et al (1997) A new pathway for transmembrane electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides not involving the excited special pair. Biochemistry 36:6855–6861. doi: 10.1021/bi9703756 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van Stokkum IHM, Larsen DS, van Grondelle R (2004) Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim Biophys Acta 1657:82–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodbury NW, Allen JP (1995) The pathway, kinetics and thermodynamics of electron transfer in wild type and mutant reaction centers of purple nonsulfur bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan M, Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 527–557Google Scholar
  36. Yang E, Kirmaier C, Krayer M et al (2011) Photophysical properties and electronic structure of stable, tunable synthetic bacteriochlorins: extending the features of native photosynthetic pigments. J Phys Chem B 115:10801–10816. doi: 10.1021/jp205258s CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeates TO, Komiya H, Chirino A et al (1988) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 and 2.4.1: protein-cofactor (bacteriochlorophyll, bacteriopheophytin, and carotenoid) interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7993–7997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafał Białek
    • 1
  • Gotard Burdziński
    • 1
  • Michael R. Jones
    • 2
  • Krzysztof Gibasiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of PhysicsAdam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoznanPoland
  2. 2.School of Biochemistry, Medical Sciences BuildingUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations