Singlet oxygen-mediated signaling in plants: moving from flu to wild type reveals an increasing complexity
- 881 Downloads
Singlet oxygen (1O2)-mediated signaling has been established in the conditional fluorescent (flu) mutant of Arabidopsis. In the dark, the flu mutant accumulates free protochlorophyllide (Pchlide), a photosensitizer that in the light generates 1O2. The release of 1O2 leads to growth inhibition of mature plants and bleaching of seedlings. These 1O2-mediated responses depend on two plastid proteins, EXECUTER (EX) 1 and 2. An ex1/ex2/flu mutant accumulates in the dark Pchlide and upon illumination generates similar amounts of 1O2 as flu, but 1O2-mediated responses are abrogated in the triple mutant. The 1O2- and EX-dependent signaling pathway operates also in wild type placed under light stress. However, it does not act alone as in flu, but interacts with other signaling pathways that modulate 1O2-mediated responses. Depending on how severe the light stress is, 1O2- and EX-dependent signaling may be superimposed by 1O2-mediated signaling that does not depend on EX and is associated with photo-oxidative damage. Because of its high reactivity and short half-life, 1O2 is unlikely to be a signal that is translocated across the chloroplast envelope, but is likely to interact with other plastid components close to its site of production and to generate more stable signaling molecules during this interaction. Depending on the site of 1O2 production and the severity of stress, different signaling molecules may be expected that give rise to different 1O2-mediated responses.
KeywordsSinglet oxygen-mediated signaling Executer Light stress flu mutant Arabidopsis thaliana
We are grateful to members of our laboratory for continuous support and discussions. The work done in our group was supported by the National Institute of Health (Grant R01-GM085036 to K.A.).
- Alboresi A, Dall’Osto L, Aprile A, Carillo P, Roncaglia E, Cattivelli L, Bassi R (2011) Reactive oxygen species and transcript analysis upon excess light treatment in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana vs a photosensitive mutant lacking zeaxanthin and lutein. BMC Plant Biol 11:62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Apel K (2001) Chlorophyll biosynthesis—metabolism and strategies of higher plants to avoid photooxidative stress. In: Aro EM, Andersson B (eds) Regulation of photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 235–252Google Scholar
- Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stress. In: Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Soc Plant Physiol, Rockville, MD, pp 1158–1203Google Scholar
- Girotti AW (2001) Photosensitized oxidation of membrane lipids: reaction pathways, cytotoxic effects and cytoprotective mechanisms. J Photochem Photobiol B63:103–113Google Scholar
- Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (1989) Free radicals in biology and medicine, 2nd edn. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Kim C, Apel K (2013) 1O2-mediated and EXECUTER-dependent retrograde plastid-to-nucleus signaling in norflurazon-treated seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant (in press)Google Scholar
- Murgia I, Tarantino D, Vannini C, Bracale M, Carravieri S, Soave C (2004) Arabidopsis thaliana plants overexpressing thylakoidal ascorbate peroxidase show increased resistance to paraquat-induced photo-oxidative stress and to nitric oxide-induced cell death. Plant J 38:940–953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nemeth K, Salchert K, Putnoky P, Bhalerao R, Koncz-Kalman Z, Stankovic-Stangeland B, Bako L, Mathur J, Okresz L, Stabel S, Geigenberger P, Stitt M, Redei GP, Schell J, Koncz C (1998) Pleiotropic control of glucose and hormone responses by PRL1, a nuclear WD protein, in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 12:3059–3073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saini G, Meskauskiene R, Pijacka W, Roszak P, Sjögren LL, Clarke AK, Straus M, Apel K (2011) ‘happy on norflurazon’ (hon) mutations implicate perturbance of plastid homeostasis with activating stress acclimatization and changing nuclear gene expression in norflurazon-treated seedlings. Plant J 65:690–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar