A comparison of the three isoforms of the light-harvesting complex II using transient absorption and time-resolved fluorescence measurements
- 133 Downloads
In this article we report the characterization of the energy transfer process in the reconstituted isoforms of the plant light-harvesting complex II. Homotrimers of recombinant Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 and monomers of Lhcb3 were compared to native trimeric complexes. We used low-intensity femtosecond transient absorption (TA) and time-resolved fluorescence measurements at 77 K and at room temperature, respectively, to excite the complexes selectively in the chlorophyll b absorption band at 650 nm with 80 fs pulses and on the high-energy side of the chlorophyll a absorption band at 662 nm with 180 fs pulses. The subsequent kinetics was probed at 30–35 different wavelengths in the region from 635 to 700 nm. The rate constants for energy transfer were very similar, indicating that structurally the three isoforms are highly homologous and that probably none of them play a more significant role in light-harvesting and energy transfer. No signature has been found in the transient absorption measurements at 77 K for Lhcb3 which might suggest that this protein acts as a relative energy sink of the excitations in heterotrimers of Lhcb1/Lhcb2/Lhcb3. Minor differences in the amplitudes of some of the rate constants and in the absorption and fluorescence properties of some pigments were observed, which are ascribed to slight variations in the environment surrounding some of the chromophores depending on the isoform. The decay of the fluorescence was also similar for the three isoforms and multi-exponential, characterized by two major components in the ns regime and a minor one in the ps regime. In agreement with previous transient absorption measurements on native LHC II complexes, Chl b → Chl a energy transfer exhibited very fast channels but at the same time a slow component (ps). The Chls absorbing at around 660 nm exhibited both fast energy transfer which we ascribe to transfer from ‘red’ Chl b towards ‘red’ Chl a and slow transfer from ‘blue’ Chl a towards ‘red’ Chl a. The results are discussed in the context of the new available atomic models for LHC II.
Keywordschlorophyll a chlorophyll b energy transfer excitonic interactions light-harvesting complex 2
excited state absorption
full width at half maximum
- LHC II
light-harvesting complex II
- PS II
evolution associated difference spectra
volume per volume
weight per volume
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Part of the work was supported by the ‘Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)’, which is financially supported by the ‘Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)’.
- Ke B (2001) Photosynthesis, vol. 10 of Advances in Photosynthesis, chap. 12, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Salverda JM, Vengris M, Krueger BP, Scholes GD, Czarnoleski AR, Novoderezhkin V, van Amerongen H, van Grondelle R (2003) Energy transfer in light-harvesting complexes II and CP29 of spinach studied with three pulse echo peak shift and transient grating. Biophys J 84:450–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Amerongen H, Dekker JP (2003) Light-harvesting in Photosystem II. In: Parson WW (eds), Light-Harvesting Antennas in Photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 219–251Google Scholar
- van Amerongen H, Valkunas L, van Grondelle R (2000) Photosynthetic Excitons. World Scientific, Singapore, 1st edGoogle Scholar
- van Amerongen H, van Grondelle R (2001) Understanding the energy transfer function of LHC II, the major light-harvesting complex of green plants. J Phys Chem 105:604–617Google Scholar