A cost-effective canopy temperature measurement system for precision agriculture: a case study on sugar beet
- 848 Downloads
Increasing agricultural efficiency in a sustainable manner will contribute to feed a growing population under limited land, nutrient and water resources. Water scarcity and the increasing social concern for this resource are already requiring more sophisticated irrigation and decision-support systems. To address the heterogeneity in crop water status in a commercial field, precision irrigation requires accurate information about crops (e.g., crop water status), soil (e.g., moisture content) and weather (e.g., wind speed and vapor pressure deficit). Numerous studies have shown that plant canopy temperature can be used to derive reliable plant water stress indicators, thus making it a promising tool for irrigation water management. However, efficient and cost-effective measurement techniques are still lacking. This paper assesses the potential of infrared thermometry and thermal imaging for monitoring plant water stress in a commercial sugar beet field by comparing canopy temperature data acquired from a conventional thermal camera with an inexpensive infrared sensor, both mounted on a rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Measurements were taken at various phenological stages of the sugar beet growing season. Laboratory tests were performed to determine the key features for accurate temperature measurements and flight altitude. Experiments were conducted in 2014 and 2015 in experimental and commercial sugar beet fields in Southwestern Spain to (i) develop an affordable infrared temperature system suitable for mounting on a UAV to obtain thermal information, (ii) compare sugar beet canopy temperature measurements collected with the low-cost platform with those obtained from a conventional thermal camera, both mounted on a rotary-wing UAV, (iii) identify the factors that will limit the use of the low-cost system to derive temperature-based water stress indices. To accomplish these objectives, well-watered and deficit irrigated plots were established. Results indicated that the lightweight canopy temperature system was robust and reliable, although there were some constraints related to weather conditions and delimitation of the area covered by the infrared sensor.
KeywordsInfrared thermometer sensor UAV Remote sensing Prescription map Precision irrigation
This work is part of the research project “P12-AGR-1227″, which is financially promoted by the “Andalusian Government”.
- Berk, A., Anderson, G., Acharya, P., Chetwynd, J., Bernstein, L., Shettle, E., et al. (1999). MODTRAN4 user’s manual. Bedford: Air Force Research Labaratory Hanscom AFB.Google Scholar
- Berni, J., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Suarez, L., González-Dugo, V., & Fereres, E. (2009b). Remote sensing of vegetation from UAV platforms using lightweight multiespectral and thermal imaging sensors. In C. Heipke, K. Jacobsen, S. Müller, & U. Sörgel (Eds.), ISPRS High resolution earth imaging for geosptatial information. Hannover: Leibniz Universität.Google Scholar
- Calderón, R., Navas-Cortés, J., Lucena, C., & Zarco-Tejada, P. (2013). High-resolution airborne hyperspectral and thermal imagery for early detection of verticillium wilt of olive using fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band spectral indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 139, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crawford, K., Roach, J., Dhillon, R., Rojo, F., Upadhyaya, S. (2014). An inexpensive aerial platform for precise remote sensing of almond and walnut canopy temperature.In 12th international conference on precision agriculture ISPA: Monticello, IL, USA https://www.ispag.org/media/ConferenceAbstracts2014_FINAL.pdf.
- Ehmke, T. (2013). Unmanned aerial systems for field scouting and spraying. Crops and Soils, 46(6), 4–9.Google Scholar
- González-Dugo, V., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Nicolás, E., Nortes, P. A., Alarcón, J. J., Intrigliolo, D. S., et al. (2013). Using high resolution UAV thermal imagery to assess the variability in the water status of five fruit tree species within a commercial orchard. Precision Agriculture, 14, 660–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins, D., & Vasigh, B. (2013). The economic impact of unmanned aircraft systems integration in the United States. Arlington: Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International.Google Scholar
- Melexis Data Sheet. (2009). MLX90614 family, single and dual zone infrared thermometer inTO-39. Revised. 5, March 30. Melexis NV, Ieper.Google Scholar
- Peña, J. M., Torres-Sánchez, J., de Castro, A. I., López-Granados, F., Dorado, J. (2014). The TOAS project: UAV technology for optimizing herbicide applications in weed-crop systems. In 12th international conference on precision agriculture ISPA: Monticello, IL, USA https://www.ispag.org/media/ConferenceAbstracts2014_FINAL.pdf.
- Tipler, P. A. (2000). Physik (3rd ed.). Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Tsialtas, J. T., & Maslaris, N. (2012). Leaf physiological traits and their relation with sugar beet cultivar success in two contrasting environments. International Journal of Plant Production, 6(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
- Walker, J. (2008). Fundamentals of physics (8th ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 9780471758013.Google Scholar
- Xu, Y., Ehsani, R., Kaplan, J., Ahmed, I., Kuzma, W., Orlandi, J., et al. (2014). An octo-rotor ground network for autonomous strawberry disease detection Year 1 Status Update. In: Gonzalez-de-Santos, P., Ribeiro, A. (Eds.). The 2nd international conference on robotics and associated high-technologies and equipment for agriculture and forestry, Madrid,. pp. 457-466.Google Scholar