Systematic analysis of site-specific yield distributions resulting from nitrogen management and climatic variability interactions
- 491 Downloads
At the plot level, crop simulation models such as STICS have the potential to evaluate risk associated with management practices. In nitrogen (N) management, however, the decision-making process is complex because the decision has to be taken without any knowledge of future weather conditions. The objective of this paper is to present a general methodology for assessing yield variability linked to climatic uncertainty and variable N rate strategies. The STICS model was coupled with the LARS-Weather Generator. The Pearson system and coefficients were used to characterise the shape of yield distribution. Alternatives to classical statistical tests were proposed for assessing the normality of distributions and conducting comparisons (namely, the Jarque–Bera and Wilcoxon tests, respectively). Finally, the focus was put on the probability risk assessment, which remains a key point within the decision process. The simulation results showed that, based on current N application practice among Belgian farmers (60-60-60 kgN ha−1), yield distribution was very highly significantly non-normal, with the highest degree of asymmetry characterised by a skewness value of −1.02. They showed that this strategy gave the greatest probability (60 %) of achieving yields that were superior to the mean (10.5 t ha−1) of the distribution.
KeywordsNitrogen management Climatic variability LARS-WG Weather Generator STICS Soil-crop model Pearson system Probability risk assessment
The authors would like to thank the SPW (DGARNE – DGO-3) for its financial support for the project entitled ‘Suivi en temps réel de l’environnement d’une parcelle agricole par un réseau de microcapteurs en vue d’optimiser l’apport en engrais azotés’. The authors would also like to thank the OptimiSTICS team for allowing them to use the Matlab running code of the STICS model. The authors are very grateful to CRA-W, especially the Systèmes agraires, Territoire et Technologies de l’Information unit, for providing them with the Ernage station climatic database. The authors would thank Giles Collinet and Robert Oger, for their respective contribution to the field experiments and to the paper. Finally, the authors are thankful to the MACSUR knowledge hub within which the co-authors shared their experiences for this research.
- Basso, B., Sartori, L., Cammarano, D., Fiorentino, C., Grace, P. R., Fountas, S., et al. (2012b). Environmental and economic evaluation of N fertilizer rates in a maize crop in Italy: A spatial and temporal analysis using crop models. Biosystems Engineering, 113(2), 103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brisson, N., Launay, M., Mary, B., & Beaudoin, N (Eds.). (2009). Conceptual basis, formalisations and parameterization of the STICS crop model, Versailles, FRA : Editions Quae. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/28387 (Last accessed 09-15-2014).
- Dumont, B., Basso, B., Leemans, V., Bodson, B., Destain, J. P., & Destain, M. F. (2013). Yield variability linked to climate uncertainty and nitrogen fertilisation. In J. Stafford (Ed.), Precision agriculture’13 Proceedings of the 9 th European Confernce on Precision Agriculture (pp. 427–434). The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Dumont, B., Leemans, V., Ferrandis, S., Bodson, B., Destain, J.P., & Destain, M. F., (2014a). Assessing the potential of an algorithm based on mean climatic data to predict wheat yield. Precision Agriculture, 15(3), 255–272.Google Scholar
- EC-Council Directive, 1991. Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.Google Scholar
- Hennessy, D. A. (2009a). Crop Yield Skewness and the Normal Distribution. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34(1), 34–52.Google Scholar
- Pearson, K. (1894). Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London., 185 (Full publication date: 1894/Copyright © 1894 The Royal Society), 71–110.Google Scholar
- Semenov, M. A., & Barrow, E. M. (2002). LARS-WG - A stochastic weather generator for use in climate impact studies. User manual, version 3.0, August 2002. Tech. rep., Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK. Google Scholar
- Soltani, A., & Sinclair, T. R. (2012). Modeling Physiology of crop development, growth and yield.In Soltani & Sinclair (Eds.), CABI publishing, (pp. 336). doi: 10.1079/9781845939700.0000.
- Vandenberghe, C., Marcoen, J., Sohier, C., Degre, A., Hendrickx, C., Paulus, P., 2011. Developments in monitoring the effectiveness of the EU Nitrates Directive Action Programmes: Approach by Belgium, the Walloon region. In B. Fraters, et al. (Eds.), Developments in monitoring the effectiveness of the EU Nitrates Directive Action Programmes. Results of the second MonNO3 Workshop, 2009, (pp. 119–140). http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/680717019.pdf (Last accessed 09-15-2014).
- Vrugt, J. A., Braak, C. J. F. T., Diks, C. G. H., Robinson, B. A., Hyman, J. M., & Higdon, D. (2009). Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 10(3), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Welsh, J. P., Wood, G. A., Godwin, R. J., Taylor, J. C., Earl, R., Blackmore, S., et al. (2003). Developing Strategies for Spatially Variable Nitrogen Application in Cereals. Part I: Winter Barley. Biosystems Engineering, 84(4), 481–494.Google Scholar