Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Acceptability of Beijing congestion charging from a business perspective

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beijing is China’s national capital, a major economic center, and home to nearly 22 million people. The city currently suffers from serious traffic congestion and extreme air pollution. Beijing’s metropolitan government is currently considering implementation of a congestion charging system intended to discourage the use of private motor vehicles and encourage a shift to public transportation. Nearly 1500 Beijing-area business managers responded to a survey asking their opinions about the system. The data was analyzed using multinomial logit modeling and cluster analysis to identify the major sources of support and non-support for the proposed system, and to create profiles of “typical” businesses that support, are neutral to, or oppose the system. These results indicate that support for the system is highest among small businesses located in the city’s central business district, where there is significant traffic congestion and good access to public transportation. Support is weakest among large businesses located in outer suburbs with relatively limited public transit. Business managers’ level of understanding of congestion charging and the extent to which they think it will successfully reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality were major factors in support or non-support for the proposed system. The results indicate that providing clear and credible information about the way the proposed system will work, how the revenue from congestion charging will be used, and the transportation and environmental benefits of the system are essential to gaining support from the business community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartley, B.: Mobility impacts, reactions and options, traffic demand management options in Europe: the MIRO project. Traffic Eng. Control 36(11), 596–602 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. Report on the State of Environment in Beijing (2014). http://www.bjmemc.com.cn/g327/s921/t2206.aspx

  • Beijing Transportation Research Center (TRC). Beijing Transportation Annual Report 2015, Beijing, China (2016)

  • Bell, M.G., Quddus, M.A., Schmoecker, J.D. Fonzone, A.: The impact of the congestion charge on the retail sector. Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London (2004). www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/assets/pdf/BellReport.pdf

  • Bhatt, K., Higgins, T., Berg, J.T.: Lessons Learned from International Experience in Congestion Pricing. US Department of Transportation and Federal (2008)

  • Bonsall, P., Kelly, C.: Road user charging and social exclusion: The impact of congestion charges on at-risk groups. Transp. Policy. 12(5), 406–418 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, P.W., Lythgoe, W.F.: Factors affecting the amount of effort expended in responding to questions in behavioural choice experiments. J. Choice Model. 2(2), 216–236 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clee, A.: Driving Away the Traffic: What Lessons can New York Learn from London and Stockholm’s experiences with congestion charging?. Tufts University, Middlesex County (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Integrated Transport (CfIT): Public Attitudes to Transport in England: The CfIT Report 2002. Survey Carried out by MORI for the Commission for Integrated Transport, May 2002 (London: CfIT) (2002)

  • Daunfeldt, S.O., Rudholm, N., Rämme, U.: Congestion charges and retail revenues: results from the Stockholm road pricing trial. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(3), 306–309 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Transport (DfT): Feasibility Study of Road Pricing in the UK (London: DfT) (2004). http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/documents/divisionhomepage/029709.hcsp

  • Do, A.Q., Grudnitski, G.: A neural network approach to residential property appraisal. Real Estate Appraiser 58(3), 38–45 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • ECNS: Traffic jams cost Beijing $11.3b a year. China Daily (2014). http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-09/29/content_18679171.htm

  • Eliasson, J.: A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(4), 468–480 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, J., Mattsson, L.: Equity effects of congestion pricing quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 40(7), 602–620 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2016). http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do

  • Francke, A., Kaniok, D.: Responses to differentiated road pricing schemes. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 48, 25–30 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S.: Why are efficient transport policy instruments so seldom used? In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 63–75. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, S., Gärling, T., Jakobsson, C., Jou, R.C.: A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners’ acceptance of road pricing. Transportation 31(3), 285–295 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., Cecilia, J., Peter, L., Satoshi, F.: Acceptability of road pricing. In: Verhoef, E., Bliemer, M.C., Steg, L., Van Wee, B. (eds.) Pricing in road transport: A multi-disciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing (2008)

  • Gaunt, M., Rye, T., Allen, S.: Public acceptability of road user charging: the case of Edinburgh and the 2005 referendum. Transp. Rev. 27(1), 85–102 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, W., Krupnick, A., Alberini, A.: Overcoming public aversion to congestion pricing. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35(2), 87–105 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsman, B., Quigley, J.M.: Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: ideology and self-interest. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 29(4), 854–874 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., Saleh, W.: Impacts of congestion charging on shopping trips in Edinburgh. Transp. Policy 12(5), 443–450 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittner, H., Becker, R., Kals, E.: Willingness to support traffic policy measures: the role of justice. In: Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)

  • Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M., May, A.D.: Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 39(2), 127–154 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., Gärling, T.: Determinants of private car users’ acceptability of road pricing. Transp. Policy 7(2), 153–158 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P.: Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In: Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility, pp. 263–284 (1998)

  • Jones, P.: Acceptability of road user charging: meeting the challenge. In: Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 27–62 (2003)

  • Larsen, J.E., Peterson, M.O.: Correcting for errors in statistical appraisal equations. Real Estate Appraiser Anal. 54(3), 45–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L.: Clean Air a ‘Luxury’ in Beijing’s Pollution Zone. National Public Radio (2011). http://www.npr.org/

  • Link, H. Polak, J.: How acceptable are transport pricing measures? Empirical studies in nine European countries. In: Proceedings of the 29th European Transport Conference, PTRC, London (2001)

  • Livingstone, K.: The challenge of driving through change: introducing congestion charging in central London. Plan. Theory Pract. 5(4), 490–498 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luk, J., Chung, E.: Public acceptance and technologies for road pricing. ARRB Group Limited, Vermont South (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, no. 14, pp. 281–297 (1967)

  • Mark, J., Goldberg, M.A.: Multiple regression analysis and mass assessment: a review of the issues. Appraisal J. 56(1), 89 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, A., Chiffi, D., Boscherini, E., Suter, S., Hajdul, M., Bonsall, P., Evangelinos, C., Wieland, B.: Report of charge differentiation for HGV and motorway toll differentiation to combat time space congestion. Deliverable 8.3-9.2, DIFFERENT—User Reaction and Efficient Differentiation of Charges and Tolls: Milano, Bern, Poznan, Dresden, Leeds (2008)

  • Natalie, T.: China’s smog driving top foreign talent away: U.S. business survey. REUTERS (2014). http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-pollution-survey-idUSBREA2I0KU20140319

  • Quddus, M.A., Bell, M.G., Schmöcker, J.D., Fonzone, A.: The impact of the congestion charge on the retail business in London: an econometric analysis. Transp. Policy 14(5), 433–444 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quddus, M.A., Carmel, A., Bell, M.G.: The impact of the congestion charge on retail: the London experience. J. Transp. Econ. Policy. 41(1), 113–133 (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M.G.: Congestion Charging in London: The Policy and the Politics. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Royzman, E.B.: Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5(4), 296–320 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryley, T., Gjersoe, N.: Newspaper response to the Edinburgh congestion charging proposals. Transp. Policy 13(1), 66–73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, J., Baum, M.: Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 41(1), 41–48 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, J., Schlag, B.: Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, B.: New York City’s congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States. Transp. Policy 17(4), 266–273 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, B., Schade, J.: Public acceptability of traffic demand management and pricing measures in Europe. Traffic Eng. Control 41(8), 314–318 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuitema, G., Steg, L., Forward, S.: Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44(2), 99–109 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., Bajpai, A., Litoriya, M.R.: Comparison the various clustering algorithms of weka tools. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(5), 73–80 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikow-Magny, C.: Efficient pricing in transport—overview of European Commission’s Transport Research Programme. In: Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.) Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies, pp. 13–26. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smidfeldt-Rosqvist, L., Nilsson, A., Allström, A., Bengtsson, L., Neergaard, K., Söderström, L., Viklund, L.: Förä ndrade resvanor i Stockholms län: effecter av Stockholmsförsöket. Trivecktor Traffic, Stockholm (2006). (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L.: Factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing. Accept. Transp. Pricing Strateg. 27, 187–202 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.D., Iseki, H., Kalauskas, R.: Addressing equity issues in political debated over road pricing. In: 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington (2010)

  • Transport for London. Congestion Charging (2017). https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/congestion-charge; U.S. Census Bureau (2016). http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF

  • US Census Bureau: New York population data (2016). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/topics/population.htm

  • Van Amelsfort, D., Swedish, V.: Introduction to Congestion Charging: A Guide for Practitioners in Developing Cities. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and Asian Development Bank, Beijing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor-Cundell, E.: The Retail Survey: The Impact of the Congestion Charge on the Retail Sector. London Chamber of Commerce and Industry, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslott-Hiselius, L., Brundell-Freij, K., Vagland, Å., Byström, C.: The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 43(3), 269–282 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • XINHUA: Beijing sees slower population growth. China Daily (2016). http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-01/20/content_23160880.htm

  • Zheng, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Shiwakoti, N.: Understanding public response to a congestion charge: a random-effects ordered logit approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70, 117–134 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronic Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, CF622, Hong Kong

    Xin Li

  2. Institute for Transportation Research (Intrans), Iowa State University, 2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4700, Ames, IA, 50010, USA

    John W. Shaw

  3. World Resources Institute China, Rm K-M, 7/F, Tower A, The East Gate Plaza, #9 Dongzhong Street, Beijing, 100027, China

    Daizong Liu

  4. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, NWQ Building B #4535, 2025 E Newport, Milwaukee, WI, 53211, USA

    Yun Yuan

Authors
  1. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John W. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daizong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Shaw, J.W., Liu, D. et al. Acceptability of Beijing congestion charging from a business perspective. Transportation 46, 753–776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9820-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9820-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation