Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reducing CO2 from cars in the European Union

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Union (EU) recently adopted CO2 emissions mandates for new passenger cars, requiring steady reductions to 95 gCO2/km in 2021. We use a multi-sector computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, which includes a private transportation sector with an empirically-based parameterization of the relationship between income growth and demand for vehicle miles traveled. The model also includes representation of fleet turnover, and opportunities for fuel use and emissions abatement, including representation of electric vehicles. We analyze the impact of the mandates on oil demand, CO2 emissions, and economic welfare, and compare the results to an emission trading scenario that achieves identical emissions reductions. We find that vehicle emission standards reduce CO2 emissions from transportation by about 50 MtCO2 and lower the oil expenditures by about €6 billion, but at a net added cost of €12 billion in 2020. Tightening CO2 standards further after 2021 would cost the EU economy an additional €24–63 billion in 2025, compared with an emission trading system that achieves the same economy-wide CO2 reduction. We offer a discussion of the design features for incorporating transport into the emission trading system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data source ICCT (2014a), EPRS (2014)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrell, J.: Private Transport and the European Emission Trading System: Revenue Recycling, Public Transport Subsidies, and Congestion Effects. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1844300 (2011)

  • Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., Hemous, D.: The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 131–166 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achtnicht, M., von Graevenitz, K., Koesler, S., Löschel, A., Schoeman, B., Tovar, M.: Including road transport in the EU-ETS—an alternative for the future? Report, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW GmbH) http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/gutachten/RoadTransport-EU-ETS_ZEW2015.pdf (2015)

  • Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., Van Reenen, J.: Carbon taxes, path dependency and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry. J. Polit. Econ. 124(1), 1–51 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H., Wozny, N.: Gasoline prices, fuel economy, and the energy paradox. Rev. Econ. Stat. 96, 779–795 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., Sallee, J.: Using loopholes to reveal the marginal cost of regulation: the case of fuel-economy standards. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 1375–1409 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.: Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ. J. 99, 116–131 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atabani, A., Badruddin, I., Mekhilef, S., Silitonga, A.: A review on global fuel economy standards, labels and technologies in the transportation sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 4586–4610 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, M., Kampman, B., Nelissen, D.: Price effects of incorporation of transportation into EU ETS. CE Delft Report, Delft (2007)

  • Brand, C., Anable, J., Tran, M.: Accelerating the transformation to a low carbon passenger transport system: the role of car purchase taxes, feebates, road taxes and scrappage incentives in the UK. Transp. Res. Part A 49, 132–148 (2013)

  • Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A.: Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the European carbon market. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98(1), 173–191 (2016)

  • Cambridge Econometrics: the impact of including the road transport sector in the EU ETS. A report for the European Climate Foundation, Cambridge (2014)

  • Creutzig, F., Jochem, P., Edelenbosch, O., Mattauch, L., van Vuuren, D., McCollum, D., Minx, J.: Transport: a roadblock to climate change mitigation? Science 350, 911–912 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats, J.: An analysis of the obstacles to inclusion of road transport emissions in the European Union’s emissions trading scheme. http://www.ieep.eu/assets/455/final_report_uberarbeitet.pdf (2009)

  • EC [European Commission]: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Results of the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. Brussels, Belgium (2007)

  • EC [European Commission]: Road transport: reducing CO2 emissions from vehicles. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/index_en.htm (2016)

  • EC [European Council]: Regulation No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles, Brussels, Belgium. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32009R0443:en:NOT (2009)

  • EC [European Council]: Conclusions on 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework, SN 79/14, Brussels (2014a)

  • EEA [European Environment Agency]: Monitoring of CO2 Emissions from Passenger Cars—Regulation 443/2009, European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/co2-cars-emission-7 (2014)

  • EIA [Energy Information Administration]: Almost all U.S. gasoline is blended with 10% ethanol. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=26092# (2016)

  • Ellerman, A., Jacoby, H., Zimmerman, M.: Bringing transportation into a cap-and-trade regime. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Report 136. Cambridge, MA (2006)

  • EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]: Final rulemaking to establish light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards: Joint technical support document, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010)

  • EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]: EPA optimization model for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases from automobiles (OMEGA). Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/documents/420r12024.pdf (2012a)

  • EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]: Regulatory impact analysis: final rulemaking for 2017–2025 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards. http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/documents/420r12016.pdf (2012b)

  • EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]: Fuel economy testing and labeling. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-F-14-015 (2014)

  • EPRS [European Parliamentary Research Service]: Reducing CO2 Emissions from New Cars, Briefing 20/02/2014, European Union (2014)

  • EU: Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, Brussels (2008)

  • EU: Regulation No 333/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.103.01.0015.01.ENG (2014)

  • Eur-Lex.: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0213:FIN:EN:HTML (2014)

  • Flachsland, C., Brunner, S., Edenhofer, O., Creutzig, F.: Climate policies for road transport revisited (II): Closing the policy gap with cap-and-trade. Energy Policy 39, 2100–2110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigon, S., Hoyt, D. McNally, L., Mooney-Bullock, R.: Travel matters: Mitigating Climate Change with Sustainable Surface Transportation, Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_93.pdf (2003)

  • Frondel, M., Schmidt, C., Vance, C.: A regression on climate policy: The European Commission’s legislation to reduce CO2 emissions from automobiles. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 1043–1051 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitiaux, X., Rausch, S., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J.: Biofuels, climate policy and the European vehicle fleet. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 46, 1–23 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P.: The effects of the corporate average fuel efficiency standards in the US. J. Ind. Econ. 46, 1–33 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D., Patterson, P., Singh, M., Li, J.: Feebates, rebates, and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy. Energy Policy 33, 757–775 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. MacKenzie, D.: On the road toward 2050: potential for substantial reductions in light-duty vehicle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://mitei.mit.edu/publications/reports-studies/on-the-road-toward-2050 (2015)

  • Heinrichs, H., Jochem, P., Fichtner, W.: Including road transport in the EU ETS: a model-based analysis of the German electricity and transport sector. Energy 69, 708–720 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICCT [International Council on Clean Transportation]: EU CO2 emission standards for passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C (2014a)

  • ICCT [International Council on Clean Transportation]: From Laboratory to Road: A 2014 Update of Official and “Real-World” Fuel Consumption and CO2 Values for Passenger Cars in Europe. International Council on Clean Transportation Europe, Berlin http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_LaboratoryToRoad_2014_Report_English.pdf (2014b)

  • ICCT [International Council on Clean Transportation]: Global Passenger Vehicle Standards. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C. http://www.theicct.org/info-tools/global-passenger-vehicle-standards (2016)

  • IEA [International Energy Agency]: World Energy Outlook, Paris (2015)

  • IMF [International Monetary Fund]: World Economic Outlook. Washington, DC (2015)

  • Jaffe, A., Stavins, R.: Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effect of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 29, 43–63 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochem, P.: A CO2 Emission Trading Scheme for German Road Transport. Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden (2009)

  • Karplus, V.: Climate and energy policy for U.S. passenger vehicles: a technology-rich economic modeling and policy analysis. Ph.D. Thesis. Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2011)

  • Karplus, V., Paltsev, S.: Proposed vehicle fuel economy standards in the United States for 2017–2025: impacts on the economy, energy, and greenhouse gas emissions. Transp. Res. Rec. 2287, 132–139 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, V., Paltsev, S., Babiker, M., Reilly, J.: Applying engineering and fleet detail to represent passenger vehicle transport in a computable general equilibrium model. Econ. Model. 30, 295–305 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, V., Kishimoto, P., Paltsev, S.: The global energy, CO2 emissions, and economic impact of vehicle fuel economy standards. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 49, 517–538 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieckhäfer, K., Feld, V., Jochem, P., Wachter, K., Spengler, T.S., Walther, G., Fichtner, W.: Prospects for regulating the CO2 emissions from passenger cars within the European Union after 2023. Z. für Umweltpol. und Umweltr. 38(4), 425–450 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klier, T., Linn, J.: Fuel Prices and New Vehicle Fuel Economy in Europe. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knittel, C.: Reducing petroleum consumption from transportation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26, 93–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knittel, C., Busse, M., Zettelmeyer, F.: Are consumers myopic? Evidence from new and used car purchases. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 220–256 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Muûls M., Wagner U.: Carbon markets, carbon prices and innovation: Evidence from interviews with managers. London School of Economics, http://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2013conference/program/retrieve.php?pdfid=372 (2012)

  • Mock, P., Tietge, U., German, J., Bandivadekar, A.: Road Transport in the EU Emissions Trading System: An Engineering Perspective. Working Paper 2014-11, International Council on Clean Transportation (2014)

  • Narayanan, B., Aguiar, A., McDougall, R.: Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 8 Data Base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev, S., Viguier, L., Babiker, M., Reilly, J., Tay, K-H.: Disaggregating Household Transport in the MIT-EPPA Model. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Technical Note 5, Cambridge, MA (2004)

  • Paltsev, S., Reilly, J., Jacoby, H., Eckhaus, R., J. McFarland, J., Sarofim, M. Babiker, M.: The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4. Report 125. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change. Cambridge, MA (2005)

  • Paltsev, S., Reilly, J., Jacoby, H., Tay, K.-H.: How (and Why) do climate policy costs differ among countries? In: Schlesinger, M., et al. (eds.) Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, 282–293. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev, S., Capros, P.: Cost concepts for climate change mitigation. Clim. Change Econ. 4, 1340003 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltsev, S., Karplus, V., Chen, H., Karkatsouli, I., Reilly, J., Jacoby, H.: Regulatory control of vehicle and power plant emissions: how effective and at what cost? Clim. Policy 15, 438–457 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch, S., Metcalf, G., Reilly, J., Paltsev, S.: Distributional implications of alternative U.S. greenhouse gas control measures. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 10(1), 1–44 (2010)

  • Rausch, S., Karplus, V.: Markets versus Regulation: the efficiency and distributional impacts of U.S. climate policy proposals. Energy J. 35(SI1), 199–227 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raux, C., Marlot, G.: A system of tradable CO2 permits applied to fuel consumption by motorists. Transp. Policy 12, 255–265 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo-AEA.: Evaluation of Regulations 443/2009 and 510/2011 on the reduction of CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles. Brussels, 9th December 2014 (2014)

  • Schwanen, T., Banister, D., Anable, J.: Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 993–1006 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, K., Van Dender, K.: Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. Energy J. 28, 25–52 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, T.: Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy 41, 75–83 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TNO: Support for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 on CO2 emissions from cars. Service request #1 for Framework Contract on Vehicle Emissions. Delft http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars/docs/study_car_2011_en.pdf (2011)

  • Transport & Environment.: Manipulation of fuel economy test results by carmakers: further evidence, costs, and solutions. http://www.transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/publications/2014%20Mind%20the%20Gap_T%26E%20Briefing_FINAL.pdf (2014)

  • US EPCA.: United States Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. Pub. L. No. 94–163 (1975)

  • Waugh, C., Paltsev, S., Selin, N., Reilly, J., Morris J., Sarofim, M.: Emission Inventory for Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollutants in EPPA 5. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Technical Note 12, Cambridge, MA (2011)

  • Winkler, S., Wallington, T., Maas, H., Hass, H.: Light-duty vehicle CO2 targets consistent with 450 ppm CO2 stabilization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 6453–6460 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Jamie Bartholomay and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable contribution. The authors affiliated with the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change gratefully acknowledge the financial support to the Program from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science under DE-FG02-94ER61937, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under XA-83600001-1, and other government, industry, and foundation sponsors of the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change (For a complete list of sponsors, please visit http://globalchange.mit.edu/sponsors/all). The authors affiliated with the ZEW gratefully acknowledge funding by Adam Opel AG/General Motors and BMW as part of the project “The Future of Europe’s Strategy to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Road Transport”. Any opinions expressed in the paper are those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey Paltsev.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 94 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paltsev, S., Henry Chen, YH., Karplus, V. et al. Reducing CO2 from cars in the European Union. Transportation 45, 573–595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9741-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9741-3

Keywords

Navigation