Transportation

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 957–974 | Cite as

The interactions between e-shopping and traditional in-store shopping: an application of structural equations model

Article

Abstract

As the proliferation of e-commerce leads to ever greater numbers of on-line transactions, transportation planners are interested in the impacts of e-shopping on our strained transportation systems. Although the substitution effect of e-shopping is appealing, previous studies provided mixed results on its impact. Using 539 adult internet users in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolitan area, this study applied a structural equations model to investigate the interactions among online purchases, in-store shopping, and product information search via internet. We found that online searching frequency has positive impacts on both online and in-store shopping frequencies and online buying positively affects in-store shopping. In particular, the marginal effects of online-buying frequency and online-searching frequency on in-store shopping frequency were estimated at 0.153 and 0.189, respectively. Since the internet as a shopping channel tends to have a complementary effect on in-store shopping, the rise of e-shopping is not likely to be a solution but a challenge to travel reduction.

Keywords

Information and communication technology Travel demand Teleshopping Shopping channel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Institute, a program of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Transportation Studies (CTS) through the TechPlan Program, which is part of the State and Local Policy Program at the Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. Financial support was provided by the US Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technologies Administration (RITA).

References

  1. Anderson, W.P., Chatterjee, L., Lakshmanan, T.R.: E-commerce, transportation, and economic geography. Growth Ch 34(4), 415–432 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babbie, E.R.: The Practice of Social Research, 11th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., Goodwin, P.: Smarter choices–changing the way we travel. http://www2.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/smarterchoices/ctwwt/ (2004). Accessed 6 Oct 2011
  4. Cao, X.: E-shopping, spatial attributes, and personal travel: a review of empirical studies. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2135, 160–169 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao, X., Douma, F., Cleaveland, F.: The influence of e-shopping on shopping travel: evidence from Twin Cities. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2157, 147–154 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Census: Estimated Quarterly U.S. Retail Sales (Adjusted): Total and E-commerce. http://www.census.gov/retail/ (2011)
  8. Choo, S., Lee, T., Mokhtarian, P.: Do transportation and communications tend to be substitutes, complements, or neither? U.S. consumer expenditures perspective, 1984–2002. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2010, 121–132 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Circella, G., Mokhtarian, PL.: Complementarity or substitution of online and in-store shopping: empirical analysis from Northern California. Paper presented at the the 89th transportation research board annual meeting, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  10. comScore Press release: comScore reports $29.1 billion in U.S. retail e-commerce spending for full november–december holiday season, up 4 percent vs. year ago. http://comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/1/comScore_Reports_29.1_Billion_in_U.S._Retail_E-Commerce_Spending_for_Full_November-December_Holiday_Season_Up_4_Percent_vs._Year_Ago (2010). Accessed 6 Jan 2010
  11. Farag, S., Krizek, K.J., Dijst, M.: E-shopping and its relationship with in-store shopping: empirical evidence from the Netherlands and the USA. Transp Rev 26(1), 43–61 (2006). doi: 10.1080/01441640500158496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farag, S., Schwanen, T., Dijst, M.: Empirical investigation of online searching and buying and their relationship to shopping trips. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1926, 242–251 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farag, S., Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., Faber, J.: Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationships between e-shopping and in-store shopping. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 41(2), 125–141 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrell, C.: Home-based teleshoppers and shopping travel: do teleshoppers travel less? Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1894, 241–248 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrell, C.: Home-based teleshopping and shopping travel: where do people find the time? Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1926, 212–223 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garson, D.: Data levels and measurement. http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/datalevl.htm (2009). Accessed 11 Feb 2010
  17. Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., Boulianne, S.: Testing! testing! one, two, three-testing the theory in structural equation models! personality and individual differences 42(5):841–850 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001
  18. Hu, P.S., Reuscher, T.R.: Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, USDOT (2004)Google Scholar
  19. McIntosh, C.N.: Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Pers Individ Differ 42(5), 859–867 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mokhtarian, P.L.: A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 24(3), 231–242 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. Mokhtarian, P.L.: A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce. Transportation 31(3), 257–284 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mokhtarian, PL., Circella, G.: The role of social factors in store and internet purchase frequencies of clothing/shoes. Paper presented at the The international workshop on frontiers in transportation: social interactions, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct 14–16 2007Google Scholar
  23. Mokhtarian, P.L., Ory, D.T., Cao, X.: Shopping-related attitudes: a factor and cluster analysis of Northern California shoppers. Environ Plan B Plan Des 36, 204–228 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mueller, R.O.: Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling : An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer texts in statistics, Springer, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Modeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 43(1), 26–43 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pendyala, R.M., Goulias, K.G., Kitamura, R.: Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation 18(4), 383–409 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G.A.: A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Ren, F., Kwan, M.P.: The impact of geographic context on e-shopping behavior. Environ Plan B Plan Des 36, 262–278 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salomon, I.: Telecommunications and travel relationships—a review. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 20(3), 223–238 (1986)Google Scholar
  30. Santos, A., McGuckin, N., Nakamoto, H.Y., Gray, D., Liss, S.: Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Federal Highway Administration, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Shoup, D.C.: The High Cost of Free Parking. Planners Press, American Planning Association, Chicago (2005)Google Scholar
  32. Sim, L.L., Koi, S.M.: Singapore’s Internet shoppers and their impact on traditional shopping patterns. J Retail Consum Serv 9(2), 115–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tomarken, A.J., Waller, N.G.: Potential problems with “well fitting” models. J Abnorm Psychol 112(4), 578–598 (2003). doi: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tomarken, A.J., Waller, N.G.: Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1, 31–65 (2005). doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tonn, B.E., Hemrick, A.: Impacts of the use of e-mail and the internet on personal trip-making behavior. Social Sci Comput Rev 22(2), 270–280 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weltevreden, J.W.J., Van Rietbergen, T.: E-shopping versus city centre shopping: the role of perceived city centre attractiveness. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 98(1), 68–85 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, R., Krizek, K., Handy, S.: Trends in out-of-home and at-home activities: evidence from repeat cross-sectional surveys. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2014, 76–84 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humphrey School of Public AffairsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.China Monitor IncBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations